Project post-mortems: Mindless mismanagement of agreement

Journal of Decision Systems

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 53-73

  McAvoy, John ^a   Butler, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Abilene paradox; Adoption; Diffusion; Mindful; Mindless; Post mortem

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DIFFUSION;

ABILENE PARADOX; ADOPTION; MINDFUL; MINDLESS; POST MORTEM;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 79952063937     PISSN: 12460125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3166/JDS.18.53-73     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Al-Shahab A., Hughes R., Winstanley J., "Using causal mapping methods to identify and analyse risk in information systems projects as a post-evaluation process", Proceedings of ECITE 2004, Amsterdam, 2004.
2. Argyris C., "Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 3, 1976, p. 363-375.
3. Argyris C., "Empowerment: the emperor's new clothes", Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76, No. 3, 1998, p. 98-105.
4. Argyris C., Schon D., Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective, MA, USA, Addison-Wesley, 1978.
5. Banerjee R., "Organisational character: issues, imperatives and practices", International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2003, p. 72-83.
6. Bødker K., Pedersen J., "Workplace cultures: Looking at artifacts, symbols and practices", Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems, Greenbaum K., Kyng M. (Eds.), NJ, USA, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991, p. 121-136.
7. Bowe C., Lahey L., Kegan R., Armstrong E., "Questioning the big assumptions. Part I: addressing personal contradictions that impede professional development", Medical Education, Vol. 37, No. 8, 2003a, p. 715-722.
8. Bowe C., Lahey L., Kegan R., Armstrong E., "Questioning the big assumptions. Part II: recognizing organizational contradictions that impede organisational change", Medical Education, Vol. 37, No. 9, 2003b, p. 723-733.
9. Ezey P., "Integration and its challenges in participant observation", Qualitative Research, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2003, p. 191-205.
10. Fichman R., Kemerer C., "The illusory diffusion of innovation: An examination of assimilation gaps", Information Systems Research, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1999, p. 255-275.
11. Goleman D., Vital Lies Simple Truths: The Psychology of Self-Deception, NY, USA, Simon and Schuster Books, 1996
12. Harvey J., "The Abilene paradox: The management of agreement", Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1974, p. 63-80.
13. Harvey J., "Abilene revisited: An epilogue", Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2001, p. 35-37.
14. Hoffman T., "After the fact", Computerworld, Vol. 39, No. 28, 2005, p. 39-40.
15. Jorgensen D., Participant observation: A methodology for human studies, CA, USA, Sage Publications, 1989.
16. Kegan R., Lahey L., How the way we talk can change the way we work, CA, USA, Jossey- Bass, 2001a
17. Kegan R., Lahey L., "The real reason people won't change", Harvard Business Review, Vol. 79, No. 10, 2001b, p. 85-89.
18. Kerth N., "Lemonade from lemons: Learning from project failure", Beyond chaos: The expert edge in managing software development, Constantine L. (Ed.), NJ, USA, Addison- Wesley, 2001, p. 127-133
19. Kerzner H., Advanced project management: Best practices on implementation, NY, USA, John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
20. Kim Y., "A comparative study of the 'Abilene paradox' and 'groupthink'", Public Administration Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2001, p. 168-187.
21. Klein K., Myers M., "A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1999, p. 67-94.
22. Kwak Y., Stoddard J., "Project risk management: lessons learned from software development environment", Technovation, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2003, p. 915-920.
23. Lewis J., Fundamentals of project management, NY, USA, AMACOM, 2001.
24. Lundell, B., Lings, B. "Changing perceptions of CASE technology", The Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 72, No. 2, 2004, p. 271-280.
25. Milgram S., "Group pressure and action against a person", Small groups, Taylor D. (Ed.), Il, USA, Markham Publishing Company, 1971, p. 157-170.
26. Nash D., "Beyond buy-in", P&T Journal, Vol. 27, No. 11, 2002, p. 617-618.
27. Neill C., "The extreme programming bandwagon: revolution or just revolting?", IT Professional, Vol. 5, No. 5, 2003, p. 62-64.
28. Olson D., Stimmel C., The manager pool. Patterns for radical leadership, NJ, USA, Addison- Wesley, 2002
29. Orlikowski W., "CASE tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1993, p. 309-340.
30. Pfeffer J., Sutton R., The Knowing Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action, MA, USA, Harvard Business School Press, 2002.
31. Power D., Decision Support Systems: Concepts and resources for managers, CT, USA, Quourum Books, 2002.
32. Rainwater J., Herding cats: A primer for programmers who lead programmers, NY, USA, Springer-Verlag, 2002.
33. Robbins H., Finley M., Why teams don't work, London, UK, Orion Publishing, 1998.
34. Roberts E., Fusfeld A., "Informal leadership roles in the innovation process", The human side of managing technological innovation, Katz R. (Ed.), NY, USA, Oxford University Press, 1997, p. 273-287.
35. Robinson, H., Sharp, H. "The social side of technical practices", Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Extreme Programming and Agile processes in software engineering (XP2005), Sheffield, UK, 2005.
36. Salo O., Kolehmainen K., Kyllonen P., Lothman J., Salmijarvi S., Abrahamsson P.,"Selfadaptability of agile software processes: A case study on post-iteration workshops", Proceedings of the Extreme programming and agile processes in software engineering. 5th International Conference, Germany, 2004
37. Schalken J., Brinkkemper S., Van Vliet H., "Discovering the relationship between project factors and project success in post-mortem evaluations", Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Software Process Improvement, Trondheim, Norway, 2004.
38. Seligman L., "Sensemaking throughout adoption and the innovation-decision process", European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2006, p. 108-120.
39. Sparks D., "Inner conflicts, inner strengths", Journal of Staff Development, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2002, p. 66-71.
40. Stake R., The art of case study research,CA, USA, Sage Publications, 1995.
41. Swanson E., "Telling an innovation story", Diffusing software product and process innovations, Ardis M., Marcolin B. (Eds.), MA, USA, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001, p. 1-4.
42. Swanson E., Ramiller N., "Innovating mindfully with information technology", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2004, p. 553-583.
43. Walsham G., "Interpretive Case Studies in IS Research: Nature and Method", European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1995, p. 74-81.
44. Weick K., Sensemaking in Organizations, CA, USA, Sage, 1995.
45. Weick K., Roberts K., "Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 3, 1993, p. 357-381.
46. Wiegers K., Rothman J., "Looking back, looking ahead", Software Development, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2001, p. 65-69.
47. Yin R., Case Study Research: Design and Method, CA, USA, Sage Publications, 2003.
48. Yourdon E., The rise and resurrection of the American programmer, NJ, USA, Prentice Hall Inc, 1998.