Controlling the unconscious: Attentional task sets modulate subliminal semantic and visuomotor processes differentially

Psychological Science

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 282-291

  Martens, Ulla ^a,b   Ansorge, Ulrich ^c   Kiefer, Markus ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

attentional control; automatic processes; semantic priming; unconscious cognition; visuomotor priming

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; EGO DEVELOPMENT; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; VISION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CUES; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); SUBLIMINAL STIMULATION; UNCONSCIOUS (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79952057248     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797610397056     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ansorge, U., Heumann, M., & Scharlau, I. (2002). Influences of visibility, intentions, and probability in a peripheral cuing task. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 528-545.
2. Ansorge, U., & Horstmann, G. (2007). Preemptive control of attentional capture by colour: Evidence from trial-by-trial analyses and orderings of onsets of capture effects in reaction time distributions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 952-975.
3. Ansorge, U., Kiefer, M., Khalid, S., Grassl, S., & König, P. (2010). Testing the theory of embodied cognition with subliminal words. Cognition, 116, 303-320.
4. Ansorge, U., Kiss, M., & Eimer, M. (2009). Goal-driven attentional capture by invisible colors: Evidence from event-related potentials. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 648-653.
5. Ansorge, U., & Neumann, O. (2005). Intentions determine the effect of invisible metacontrast-masked primes: Evidence for top-down contingencies in a peripheral cueing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 762-777.
6. Bentin, S., McCarthy, G., & Wood, C.C. (1985). Event-related potentials, lexical decision, and semantic priming. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 343-355.
7. Bub, D.N., & Masson, M.E.J. (2010). Grasping beer mugs: On the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 341-358.
8. Carr, T.H., & Dagenbach, D. (1990). Semantic priming and repetition priming from masked words: Evidence for a center-surround attentional mechanism in perceptual recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 341-350.
9. Duscherer, K., & Holender, D. (2002). No negative semantic priming from unconscious flanker words in sight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 839-853.
10. Haynes, J.D., Sakai, K., Rees, G., Gilbert, S., Frith, C., & Passing-ham, R.E. (2007). Reading hidden intentions in the human brain. Current Biology, 17, 323-328.
11. Houghton, G., Pritchard, R., & Grange, J.A. (2009). The role of cue-target translation in backward inhibition of attentional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 466-476.
12. Jaskowski, P., Skalska, B., & Verleger, R. (2003). How the self controls its automatic pilot when processing subliminal information. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 911-920.
13. Jolij, J., & Lamme, V.A. (2005). Repression of unconscious information by conscious processing: Evidence from affective blindsight induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 10747-10751.
14. Kahneman, D., & Chajczyk, D. (1983). Tests of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 497-509.
15. Kiefer, M. (2002). The N400 is modulated by unconsciously perceived masked words: Further evidence for an automatic spreading activation account of N400 priming effects. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 27-39.
16. Kiefer, M. (2007). Top-down modulation of unconscious automatic processes: A gating framework. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 289-306.
17. Kiefer, M., & Brendel, D. (2006). Attentional modulation of unconscious automatic processes: Evidence from event-related potentials in a masked priming paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 184-198.
18. Kiefer, M., & Martens, U. (2010). Attentional sensitization of unconscious cognition: Task sets modulate subsequent masked semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 464-489.
19. Kiefer, M., Martens, U., Weisbrod, M., Hermle, L., & Spitzer, M. (2009). Increased unconscious semantic activation in schizophrenia patients with formal thought-disorder. Schizophrenia Research, 114, 79-83.
20. Kiefer, M., & Spitzer, M. (2000). Time course of conscious and unconscious semantic brain activation. NeuroReport, 11, 2401- 2407.
21. Kiefer, M., Weisbrod, M., Kern, I., Maier, S., & Spitzer, M. (1998). Right hemisphere activation during indirect semantic priming: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain & Language, 64, 377-408.
22. Klotz, W., & Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 976-992.
23. Kunde, W., Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2003). Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition. Cognition, 88, 223-242.
24. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S.A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
25. Martens, U., & Kiefer, M. (2009). Specifying attentional top-down influences on subsequent unconscious semantic processing. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 5, 56-68.
26. Maxfield, L. (1997). Attention and semantic priming: A review of prime task effects. Consciousness and Cognition, 6, 204-218.
27. Mayr, U., & Keele, S.W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
28. Naccache, L., Blandin, E., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 13, 416-424.
29. Neumann, O. (1984). Automatic processing: A review of recent findings and a plea for an old theory. In W. Prinz & A.F. Sanders (Eds.), Cognition and motor processes (pp. 245-293). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
30. Pessoa, L., Kastner, S., & Ungerleider, L.G. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of attention: From modulation of sensory processing to top-down control. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 3990-3998.
31. Pessoa, L., McKenna, M., Gutierrez, E., & Ungerleider, L.G. (2002). Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 11458-11463.
32. Posner, M.I., & Snyder, C.R.R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R.L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Raz, A., Kirsch, I., Pollard, J., & Nitkin-Kaner, Y. (2006). Suggestion reduces the Stroop effect. Psychological Science, 17, 91-95.
34. Reynolds, J.H., Pasternak, T., & Desimone, R. (2000). Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons. Neuron, 26, 703-714.
35. Rogers, R.D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
36. Ruoff, A. (1990). Häufigkeitswörterbuch gesprochener Sprache (2nd ed.). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.
37. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R.M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: 1. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
38. van Gaal, S., Lamme, V.A.F., & Ridderinkhof, K.R. (2010). Unconsciously triggered conflict adaptation. PLoS ONE, 5(7), e11508. Retrieved fromhttp://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0011508.
39. Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 100, 6275-6280.
40. Wiese, H., Schweinberger, S.R., & Neumann, M.F. (2008). Perceiving age and gender in unfamiliar faces: Brain potential evidence for implicit and explicit person categorization. Psychophysiology, 45, 957-969.