Evaluation of two noninvasive repositioning systems for computer-assisted oral implant surgery in oral cancer patients

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 463-468

  Bodard, Anne Gaëlle ^a,b   Paris, Marion ^c   Salino, Samuel ^a   Fortin, Thomas ^b,c  

^a CENTRE LÉON BÉRARD   (France)

^b UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EDENTULOUSNESS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FIDUCIAL MARKER; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH TUMOR; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PHARYNX CANCER; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

AGED; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; FEMALE; FIDUCIAL MARKERS; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MOUTH NEOPLASMS; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PHARYNGEAL NEOPLASMS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 79952052858     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Fortin T, Champleboux G, Bianchi S, Buatois H, Coudert JL. Precision of transfer of preoperative planning for oral implants based on cone-beam CT-scan images through a robotic drilling machine. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13: 651-656.
2. van Steenberghe D, Glauser R, Blombäck U, et al. A computed tomographic scan-derived customized surgical template and fixed prosthesis for flapless surgery and immediate loading of implants in fully edentulous maxillae: A prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7(suppl 1): S111-120.
3. Spector L. Computer-aided dental implant planning. Dent Clin North Am 2008;52: 761-775.
4. Bousquet F, Joyard M. Surgical navigation for implant placement using transtomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19: 724-730.
5. Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, McGlumphy EA, Rosenstiel SF. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomographyderived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67: 394-401.
6. Ruppin J, Popovic A, Strauss M, Spüntrup E, Steiner A, Stoll C. Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: Optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19: 709-716.
7. Metson R. Intraoperative image-guidance technology. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125: 1278-1279.
8. Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, Sendyk WR, Sendyk CL. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: Preliminary results. J Periodontol 2005;76: 503-507.
9. Job S, Bhat V, Naidu EM. In vivo evaluation of crestal bone heights following implant placement with "flapless" and "with-flap" techniques in sites of immediately loaded implants. Indian J Dent Res 2008;19: 320-325.
10. Nkenke E, Eitner S, Radespiel-Tröger M, Vairaktaris E, Neukam FW, Fenner M. Patient-centred outcomes comparing transmucosal implant placement with an open approach in the maxilla: A prospective, non-randomized pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18: 197-203.