Characterizing High School Students' Written Explanations in Biology Laboratories

Research in Science Education

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 169-191

  Peker, Deniz ^a   Wallace, Carolyn S ^b  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biology laboratories; Science writing; Scientific explanations; Student epistemologies

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952043490     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11165-009-9151-z     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abrams, E., Southerland, S., & Cummins, C. (2001). The "hows" and "whys" of biological change: how learners neglected physical mechanisms in their search for meaning. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 1271-1281.
2. Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.) (trans: McGee, V. W.). Austin TX: The University of Texas Press.
3. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. (1993). Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication, 10, 475-509.
4. Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93, 26-55.
5. Chambliss, M. J., Christenson, L. A., & Parker, C. (2003). Fourth graders composing scientific explanations about the effects of pollutants: Writing to understand. Written Communication, 20, 426-454.
6. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
7. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham: Biddless Limited.
8. Georgia Department of Education, (2007). Office of curriculum and instruction. Retrieved February, 25, 2007, from http://public. doe. k12. ga. us/ci_testing. aspx.
9. Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
10. Hempel, C. (1991). Laws and their role in scientific explanation. In R. Boyd, P. Gasper & J. D. Trout (Eds.), The philosophy of science (pp. 299-315). Cambridge: MIT.
11. Keys, C. W. (1999). Language as an indicator of meaning generation: an analysis of middle school students' written discourse about scientific investigation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1044-1061.
12. Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1065-1084.
13. Kitcher, P. (1997). Explanatory unification. In R. Boyd, P. Gasper & J. D. Trout (Eds.), The philosophy of science (pp. 329-347). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
14. Krupa, M. P., Selman, R. L., & Jaquette, D. S. (1985). The development of science explanations in children and adolescents: A structural approach. In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Volume 2, research and open questions (pp. 427-455). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
15. Ladyman, J. (2000). What is really wrong with constructivism? van Fraassen and the metaphysics of modality. British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 51, 837-856.
16. Ladyman, J. (2002). Understanding philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
17. Lipton, P. (1991). Inference to the best explanation. London: Routledge.
18. Louca, L., Elby, A., Hammer, D., & Kagey, T. (2004). Epistemological resources: applying a new epistemological framework to science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 39, 57-68.
19. McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153-191.
20. Metz, K. E. (1991). Development of explanation: incremental and fundamental change in children's physics knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 785-797.
21. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington: National Academy Press.
22. Ohlsson, S. (1992). The cognitive skill of theory articulation: a neglected aspect of science education? Science & Education, 1, 181-192.
23. Park, J., & Han, S. (2002). Using deductive reasoning to promote the change of students' conceptions about force and motion. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 593-609.
24. Prain, V. (2004). The role of language in science learning and literacy. In C. S. Wallace, B. Hand & V. Prain (Eds.), Writing and learning in the science classroom (pp. 33-45). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
25. Roth, W.-M. (1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
26. Roth, W.-M. (2005). Talking science: Language and learning in science classrooms. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
27. Salmon, W. C. (1998). Causality and explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Sandoval, W. A. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students' scientific explanations. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 12, 5-51.
29. Solomon, J. (1986). Children's explanations. Oxford Review of Education, 12, 41-51.
30. Southerland, S. A., Abrams, E., Cummins, C. L., & Anzelmo, J. (2001). Understanding students' explanation of biological phenomena: conceptual frameworks or p-prims. Science Education, 85, 328-348.
31. Treagust, D. F., & Harrison, A. G. (2000). In search of explanatory frameworks: an analysis of Richard Feynman's lecture 'Atoms in Motion'. International Journal of Science Education, 22(11), 1157-1170.
32. Treagust, D., & Harrison, A. (2003). The genesis of effective scientific explanations for the classroom. In J. Loughran (Ed.), Researching teaching: Methodologies and practices for understanding pedagogy (pp. 28-43). Philadelphia: Falmer.
33. Veel, R. (1997). Learning how to mean-scientifically speaking: Apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social process in the workplace and school (pp. 161-195). London: Cassell.
34. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
35. Wallace, C. S., Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2004). Writing and learning in the science classroom. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
36. Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
37. Williamson, J. (2003). Lorenzo Magnani: abduction, reason, and science: processes of discovery and explanation. British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 54, 353-358.
38. Zuzousky, R., & Tamir, P. (1999). Growth patterns in students' ability to supply scientific explanations: findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study in Israel. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 1101-1121.