Is data privacy always good for software testing?

Proceedings - International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, ISSRE

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 368-377

  Grechanik, Mark ^a   Csallner, Christoph ^b   Fu, Chen ^c   Xie, Qing ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

^c ACCENTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CODE COVERAGE; DATA ANONYMIZATION; DATA ELEMENTS; ENTERPRISE COMPUTING; K-ANONYMITY; K-ANONYMIZATION; LOWER COST; PROGRAM ANALYSIS; SENSITIVE DATAS; SENSITIVE INFORMATIONS; TEST COVERAGE; TEST ENGINEERS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; QUALITY ASSURANCE; SEMANTICS; SOFTWARE RELIABILITY; SOFTWARE TESTING; TESTING;

DATA PRIVACY;

EID: 79952026752     PISSN: 10719458     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ISSRE.2010.13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. G. M. Kapfhammer and M. L. Soffa, "A family of test adequacy criteria for database-driven applications," in Proc. 11th ACM SIGSOFT FSE. ACM, 2003, pp. 98-107.
2. "International data privacy laws," http://www. informationshield.com/intprivacylaws.html.
3. D. J. Richardson, S. Leif-Aha, and T. O. O'Malley, "Specification- based Test Oracles for Reactive Systems," in Proceedings of the 14th ICSE, May 1992, pp. 105-118.
4. C. Kaner, J. Bach, and B. Pettichord, Lessons Learned in Software Testing. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2001.
5. T. E. Murphy, "Managing test data for maximum productivity," http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?doc-cd=163662&ref=g-economy-2reduce, Dec. 2008.
6. A. S. Namin and J. H. Andrews, "The influence of size and coverage on test suite effectiveness," in Proc. 18th ISSTA. ACM, 2009, pp. 57-68.
7. H. Zhu, P. A. V. Hall, and J. H. R. May, "Software unit test coverage and adequacy," ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 366-427, 1997.
8. J. T. Alexander, M. Davern, and B. Stevenson, "Inaccurate age and sex data in the census pums files: Evidence and implications," National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 15703, January 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.nber.org/papers/w15703
9. C. Bialik, "Census bureau obscured personal data - too well, some say," The Wall Street Journal, Feb. 2010.
10. W. Aspray, F. Mayades, and M. Vardi, Globalization and Offshorting of Software. ACM, 2006.
11. Datamonitor, "Application testing services: global market forecast model," Aug. 2007.
12. C. C. Aggarwal and P. S. Yu, Privacy-Preserving Data Mining: Models and Algorithms. Springer, 2008.
13. P. Samarati, "Protecting respondents' identities in microdata release," IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1010-1027, 2001.
14. INCITS/ISO/IEC, "Information technology - database languages - sql - part 5: Host language bindings (sql/bindings)." INCITS/ISO/IEC, Tech. Rep., 1999.
15. G. Cormode and D. Srivastava, "Anonymized data: generation, models, usage," in Proc. 35th ACM SIGMOD. ACM, 2009, pp. 1015-1018.
16. W. Landi, "Undecidability of static analysis," ACM Lett. Program. Lang. Syst., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 323-337, 1992.
17. J. Nin, J. Herranz, and V. Torra, "Attribute selection in multivariate microaggregation," in Proc. PAIS. ACM, 2008, pp. 51-60.
18. K. LeFevre, D. J. DeWitt, and R. Ramakrishnan, "Mondrian multidimensional k-anonymity," in Proc. 22nd ICDE. IEEE, 2006, p. 25.
19. K. Sen and G. Agha, "Cute and jCute: Concolic unit testing and explicit path model-checking tools," in Proc. CAV. Springer, Aug. 2006, pp. 419-423.
20. L. Sweeney, "k-anonymity: A model for protecting privacy," International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 557-570, 2002.
21. J.-M. Kim and A. A. Porter, "A history-based test prioritization technique for regression testing in resource constrained environments," in ICSE, 2002, pp. 119-129.
22. M. J. Harrold, R. Gupta, and M. L. Soffa, "A methodology for controlling the size of a test suite," ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 270-285, Jul. 1993.
23. R. A. Santelices, P. K. Chittimalli, T. Apiwattanapong, A. Orso, and M. J. Harrold, "Test-suite augmentation for evolving software," in ASE, 2008, pp. 218-227.
24. X. Ren, F. Shah, F. Tip, B. G. Ryder, and O. Chesley, "Chianti: a tool for change impact analysis of java programs," in OOPSLA, 2004, pp. 432-448.
25. M. Castro, M. Costa, and J.-P. Martin, "Better bug reporting with better privacy," in Proc. 13th ASPLOS. ACM, Mar. 2008, pp. 319-328. [Online]. Available: http://research.microsoft.com/ jpmartin/papers/- Castro08Better.pdf
26. P. Godefroid, N. Klarlund, and K. Sen, "Dart: Directed automated random testing," in Proc. ACM SIGPLAN PLDI. ACM, Jun. 2005, pp. 213-223.
27. N. Tillmann and J. de Halleux, "Pex - white box test generation for .Net," in Proc. 2nd International Conference on Tests And Proofs (TAP). Springer, Apr. 2008, pp. 134-153.
28. C. Cadar, D. Dunbar, and D. R. Engler, "Klee: Unassisted and automatic generation of high-coverage tests for complex systems programs," in Proc. 8th USENIX OSDI. USENIX, Dec. 2008, pp. 209-224.
29. C. Csallner, N. Tillmann, and Y. Smaragdakis, "DySy: Dynamic symbolic execution for invariant inference," in Proc. 30th ACM/IEEE ICSE. ACM, May 2008, pp. 281-290.