Capital, technology, and specialization in the neoclassical model

Journal of International Economics

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 229-242

  Shikher, Serge ^a  

^a SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative advantage; Computable models; Heckscher Ohlin model; International trade; Specialization; Technology

Indexed keywords

CAPITAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; MODELING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 79952004779     PISSN: 00221996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anderson J.E., van Wincoop E. Trade costs. Journal of Economic Literature 2004, 3:691-751.
2. Armington P.S. A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. IMF Staff Papers 1969, 16(1):159-178.
3. Aw B.Y., Chung S., Roberts M.J. Productivity and the decision to export: Evidence from Taiwan and South Korea. NBER Working Paper No. 6558 1998.
4. Baltagi B.H. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data 2001, John Wiley and Sons. 2nd ed.
5. Barro R.J., Lee J.-W. International data on educational attainment: updates and implications 2000, Manuscript, Harvard University.
6. Bernard A.B., Jensen B.J. Exporters, jobs, and wages in U.S. manufacturing: 1976-1987. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics 1995.
7. Bernard A.B., Jensen B.J. Exceptional exporter performance: cause, effect, or both?. Journal of International Economics 1999, 47.
8. Bernard A., Eaton J., Jensen J.B., Kortum S. Plants and productivity in international trade. American Economic Review 2003, 93(4).
9. Brown D.K. Tariffs, the terms of trade, and national product differentiation. Journal of Policy Modeling 1987, 9(3):503-526.
10. Canova F., Ortega E. Testing calibrated general equilibrium models. Simulation-Based Inference in Econometrics: Methods and Applications 2000, 400-436. Cambridge University Press, chapter 15. R. Mariano, T. Schuermann, M.J. Weeks (Eds.).
11. Caves D.W., Christensen L.R., Diewert W.E. Multilateral comparisons of output, input, and productivity using superlative index numbers. The Economic Journal 1982, 92(365):73-86.
12. Chor D. Unpacking sources of comparative advantage: a quantitative approach 2009, Manuscript, Singapore Management University.
13. Christensen L.R., Cummings D., Jorgenson D.W. Relative productivity levels, 1947-1973: an international comparison. European Economic Review 1981, 16:61-94.
14. Clerides S., Lach S., Tybout J.R. Is learning by exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1998, 67.
15. Costinot A., Komunjer I. What Goods Do Countries Trade? 2006, New Ricardian predictions, Manuscript, University of California at San Diego.
16. Eaton J., Kortum S. International technology diffusion: theory and measurement. International Economic Review 1999, 40:537-570.
17. Eaton J., Kortum S. Technology, geography, and trade. Econometrica 2002, 5:1741-1779.
18. Eaton J., Kortum S., Kramarz F. An anatomy of international trade: evidence from French firms. NBER Working Paper No. 10344 2004.
19. Ethier W. The general role of factor intensity in the theorems of international trade. Economics Letters 1982, 10:337-342.
20. Feenstra R.C. World trade flows, 1970-1992, with production and tariff data. NBER Working Paper 5910 1997.
21. Feenstra R.C. World trade flows, 1980-1997, with production and tariff data 2000, UC David, Center for International Data website.
22. Finicelli A., Pagano P., Sbracia M. Trade-revealed TFP 2007, Manuscript, Bank of Italy.
23. Grubel H.G., Lloyd P.J. Intra industry trade 1975, Macmillan.
24. Harrigan J. Technology, factor supplies, and international specialization: estimating the neoclassical model. The American Economic Review 1997, 4:475-494.
25. Harrigan J. Specialization and the volume of trade: do the data obey the laws?. The Handbook of International Trade 2003, Basil Blackwell, Previously published as FRBNY Staff Report No. 140. K. Choi, J. Harrigan (Eds.).
26. Hirschman A.O. The Strategy of Economic Development 1958, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
27. Johnson N.L., Kotz S. Continuous Univariate Distributions 1970, Houghton and Mifflin.
28. Kehoe T.J. An evaluation of the performance of applied general equilibrium models of the impact of NAFTA. Frontiers in Applied General Equilibrium Modeling 2005, Cambridge University Press. T.J. Kehoe, T.N. Srinivasan, J. Whalley (Eds.).
29. Kortum S. Research, patenting, and technological change. Econometrica 1997, 65:1389-1419.
30. Leamer E.E., Levinsohn J. International trade theory: The evidence. Handbook of International Economics 1995, 1339-1394. North-Holland, Amsterdam. G. Grossman, K. Rogoff (Eds.).
31. McDaniel C.A., Balistreri E.J. A review of Armington trade substitution elasticities. Integration and trade 2003, 7(18):161-173.
32. Panagariya A., Duttagupta R. The "gains" from preferential trade liberalization in the CGE models: Where do they come from?. Regionalism and Globalization: Theory and Practice 2001, Routledge, chapter 3. S. Lahiri (Ed.).
33. Pindyck R.S., Rubinfeld D.L. Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts 1998, Irvin/McGraw-Hill. fourth ed.
34. Romalis J. Factor proportions and the structure of commodity trade. American Economic Review 2004, 94(1).
35. Shikher S. An improved measure of industry value added and factor shares: description of a new dataset of the U.S. and Brazilian manufacturing industries 2004, Manuscript, Suffolk University.
36. Shikher S. Putting industries into the Eaton-Kortum model 2004, Manuscript, Suffolk University.
37. Stewart W.A. World Trade Data Set Code Book, 1970-1992 1999.
38. Waugh M.E. International trade and income differences 2007, Manuscript, Univesity of Iowa.