Wind pollination over mesoscale distances: An investigation with Scots pine

New Phytologist

Volumn 190, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 222-233

  Robledo Arnuncio, Juan José ^a  

^a Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria   (Spain)

Author keywords

Fragmentation; Gene flow; Genetic connectivity; Long distance dispersal; Migration rate; Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine); Pollination; Uniparental markers

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; COLONIZATION; CONIFEROUS TREE; DISPERSAL; ESTIMATION METHOD; FRAGMENTATION; GENE FLOW; GENETIC MARKER; HABITAT TYPE; HERITABILITY; HETEROGENEITY; LOCAL ADAPTATION; MAGNITUDE; METAPOPULATION; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; POLLEN; POLLINATION; POPULATION STRUCTURE; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WIND VELOCITY;

IBERIAN PENINSULA;

PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; GEOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN; POLLINATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SCOTS PINE; SEED DISPERSAL; SPAIN; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; WIND;

CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; GEOGRAPHY; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; PINUS SYLVESTRIS; POLLEN; POLLINATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SEED DISPERSAL; SPAIN; UNCERTAINTY; WIND;

EID: 79951991160     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03588.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ahmed S, Compton SG, Butlin RK, Gilmartin PM. 2009. Wind-borne insects mediate directional pollen transfer between desert fig trees 160 kilometers apart. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106: 20342-20347.
2. Aho ML. 1994. Autumn frost hardening of one-year-old Pinus sylvestris (L.) seedlings: effect of origin and parent trees. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 9: 17-24.
3. Alía R, Notivol E, Moro J. 2001. Genetic variability of Spanish provenances of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.): growth traits and survival. Silva Fennica 35: 27-38.
4. Alleaume-Benharira M, Pen IR, Ronce O. 2006. Geographical patterns of adaptation within a species' range: interactions between drift and gene flow. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19: 203-215.
5. Ashman TL, Knight TM, Steets JA, Amarasekare P, Burd M, Campbell DR, Dudash MR, Johnston MO, Mazer SJ, Mitchell RJ et al. 2004. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 85: 2408-2421.
6. Bohrerova Z, Bohrer G, Cho KD, Bolch MA, Linden KG. 2009. Determining the viability response of pine pollen to atmospheric conditions during long-distance dispersal. Ecological Applications 19: 656-667.
7. Broquet T, Yearsley J, Hirzel AH, Goudet J, Perrin N. 2009. Inferring recent migration rates from individual genotypes. Molecular Ecology 18: 1048-1060.
8. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Birkes DS, Chybicki IJ. 2006. Using genetic markers to directly estimate gene flow and reproductive success parameters in plants on the basis of naturally regenerated seedlings. Genetics 173: 363-372.
9. Campbell ID, McDonald K, Flannigan MD, Kringayark J. 1999. Long-distance transport of pollen into the Arctic. Nature 399: 29-30.
10. Cornuet JM, Piry S, Luikart G, Estoup A, Solignac M. 1999. New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics 153: 1989-2000.
11. Davis MB, Shaw RG. 2001. Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change. Science 292: 673-679.
12. Ellstrand NC. 1992. Gene flow by pollen: implications for plant conservation genetics. Oikos 67: 77-86.
13. Ellstrand NC, Elam DR. 1993. Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 217-242.
14. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes - application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479-491.
15. Faubet P, Gaggiotti OE. 2008. A new Bayesian method to identify the environmental factors that influence recent migration. Genetics 178: 1491-1504.
16. Faubet P, Waples RS, Gaggiotti OE. 2007. Evaluating the performance of a multilocus Bayesian method for the estimation of migration rates. Molecular Ecology 16: 1149-1166.
17. Franco-Múgica F, García-Antón M, Maldonado-Ruiz J, Morla-Juriasti C, Sainz-Ollero H. 2001. The Holocene history of Pinus forests in the Spanish Northern Meseta. The Holocene 11: 343-358.
18. Garcia-Ramos G, Kirkpatrick M. 1997. Genetic models of adaptation and gene flow in peripheral populations. Evolution 51: 21-28.
19. Godoy JA, Jordano P. 2001. Seed dispersal by animals: exact identification of source trees with endocarp DNA microsatellites. Molecular Ecology 10: 2275-2283.
20. Harju A, Muona O. 1989. Background pollination in Pinus sylvestris seed orchards. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 4: 513-520.
21. Holsinger KE. 1991. Mass-action models of plant mating systems: the evolutionary stability of mixed mating systems. The American Naturalist 138: 606-622.
22. Klein EK, Lavigne C, Gouyon PH. 2006. Mixing of propagules from discrete sources at long distance: comparing a dispersal tail to an exponential. BMC Ecology 6: 3.
23. Koski V. 1970. A study of pollen dispersal as a mechanism of gene flow in conifers. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae 70: 1-78.
24. Kuparinen A, Markkanen T, Riikonen H, Vesala T. 2007. Modeling air-mediated dispersal of spores, pollen and seeds in forested areas. Ecological Modelling 208: 177-188.
25. Lenormand T. 2002. Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 183-189.
26. Lindgren D, Paule L, Xihuan S, Yazdani R, Segerström U, Wallin JE, Lejdebro ML. 1995. Can viable pollen carry Scots pine genes over long distances? Grana 34: 64-69.
27. Lopez S, Rousset F, Shaw FH, Shaw RG, Ronce O. 2008. Migration load in plants: role of pollen and seed dispersal in heterogeneous landscapes. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21: 294-309.
28. Manel S, Gaggiotti OE, Waples RS. 2005. Assignment methods: matching biological questions with appropriate techniques. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20: 136-142.
29. Millar RB. 1987. Maximum likelihood estimation of mixed stock fishery composition. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 44: 583-590.
30. Milner GB, Teel DJ, Utter FM, Burley CL. 1981. Columbia River stock identification study: validation of genetic method. Annual report of research (FY80). Seattle, WA, USA: NWAFC, NOAA.
31. Muona O, Harju A. 1989. Effective population sizes, genetic variability, and mating system in natural stands and seed orchards of Pinus sylvestris. Silvae Genetica 38: 221-228.
32. Nathan R, Muller-Landau HC. 2000. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 278-285.
33. Nathan R, Schurr FM, Spiegel O, Steinitz O, Trakhtenbrot A, Tsoar A. 2008. Mechanisms of long-distance seed dispersal. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23: 638-647.
34. Nei M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.
35. Nichols H, Kelly PM, Andrews JT. 1978. Holocene palaeo-wind evidence from palynology in Baffin Island. Nature 273: 140-142.
36. Oddou-Muratorio S, Klein EK, Austerlitz F. 2005. Pollen flow in the wildservice tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. II. Pollen dispersal and heterogeneity in mating success inferred from parent-offspring analysis. Molecular Ecology 14: 4441-4452.
37. Paetkau D, Slade R, Burden M, Estoup A. 2004. Genetic assignment methods for the direct, real-time estimation of migration rate: a simulation-based exploration of accuracy and power. Molecular Ecology 13: 55-65.
38. Pella J, Masuda M. 2001. Bayesian methods for analysis of stock mixtures from genetic characters. Fishery Bulletin 99: 151-167.
39. Pessi AM, Pulkkinen P. 1994. Temporal and spatial variation of airborne Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) pollen. Grana 22: 151-157.
40. Petit R, Hampe A. 2006. Some evolutionary consequences of being a tree. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 37: 187-214.
41. Pulkkinen P, Rantio-Lehtimäki A. 1995. Viability and seasonal distribution patterns of Scots pine pollen in Finland. Tree Physiology 15: 515-518.
42. Rannala B, Mountain JL. 1997. Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 94: 9197-9201.
43. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Gil L. 2005. Patterns of pollen dispersal in a small population of Pinus sylvestris L. revealed by total-exclusion paternity analysis. Heredity 94: 13-22.
44. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Navascués M, González-Martínez SC, Gil L. 2009. Estimating gametic introgression rates in a risk assessment context: a case study with Scots pine relicts. Heredity 103: 385-393.
45. Sarvas R. 1962. Investigations on the flowering and seed crop of Pinus sylvestris. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae 53: 1-198.
46. Slatkin M. 2005. Seeing ghosts: the effect of unsampled populations on migration rates estimated for sampled populations. Molecular Ecology 14: 67-73.
47. Smouse PE, Waples RS, Tworek JA. 1990. A genetic mixture analysis for use with incomplete source population data. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47: 620-634.
48. Soto A, Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, González-Martínez SC, Smouse PE, Alía R. 2010. Climatic niche and neutral genetic diversity of the six Iberian pine species: a retrospective and prospective view. Molecular Ecology 19: 1396-1409.
49. Varis S, Pakkanen A, Galofré A, Pulkkinen P. 2009. The extent of south-north pollen transfer in Finnish Scots pine. Silva Fennica 43: 717-726.
50. Whitlock MC. 2003. Fixation probability and time in subdivided populations. Genetics 164: 767-779.
51. Williams CG. 2008. Aerobiology of Pinus taeda pollen clouds. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38: 2177-2188.
52. Williams CG. 2010. Long-distance pine pollen still germinates after meso-scale dispersal. American Journal of Botany 97: 846-855.
53. Wilson GA, Rannala B. 2003. Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 163: 1177-1191.
54. Wright S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97-159.
55. Yazdani R, Lindgren D, Stewart S. 1989. Gene dispersion within a population of Pinus sylvestris. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 4: 295-306.
56. Yeaman S, Jarvis A. 2006. Regional heterogeneity and gene flow maintain variance in a quantitative trait within populations of lodgepole pine. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273: 1587-1593.