Illusory correlations revisited: The role of pseudocontingencies and working-memory capacity

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 517-532

  Eder, Andreas B ^a   Fiedler, Klaus ^b   Hamm Eder, Silke ^c  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Feedback; Illusory correlation; Pseudocontingency; Working memory capacity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILLUSION; LEARNING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; ONLINE SYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SHORT TERM MEMORY; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; JUDGMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79951965838     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2010.509917     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4,829-839.
2. Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769-786.
3. Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 547-552.
4. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
5. Ehrenberg, K., Cataldegirmen, H., & Klauer, K. C. (2001). Valenz und Geschlechtstypikalität von 330 Verhaltensbeschreibungen: Eine Normierung fur studentische Stichproben [Valence and gender typicality of 330 behavior descriptions: A standardization for student samples]. Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie, 32,13-28.
6. Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19-23.
7. Fiedler, K. (1991). The tricky nature of skewed frequency tables: An information loss account of distinctiveness-based illusory correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 24-36.
8. Fiedler, K. (1996). Explaining and simulating judgment biases as an aggregation phenomenon in probabilistic, multiple-cue environments. Psychological Review, 103, 193-214.
9. Fiedler, K., & Freytag, P. (2004). Pseudocontingencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 453-467.
10. Fiedler, K., Freytag, P., & Meiser, T. (2009). Pseudocontingencies: An integrative account of an intriguing cognitive illusion, Manuscript submitted for publication.
11. Fiedler, K., Freytag, P., & Unkelbach, C. (2007). Pseudocontingencies in a simulated classroom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 665-677.
12. Fiedler, K., & Kareev, Y. (2006). Does decision quality (always) increase with the size of information samples? Some vicissitudes in applying the law of large numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 32, 883-903.
13. Fiedler, K., Russer, S., & Gramm, K. (1993). Illusory correlations and memory performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 111-136.
14. Fiedler, K., & Walther, E. (2004). Stereotyping as inductive hypothesis testing. New York: Psychology Press.
15. Gaissmaier, W., Schooler, L.J., & Rieskamp, J. (2006). Simple predictions fueled by capacity limitations: When are they successful? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 966-982.
16. Gordon, R. A. (1997). The moderation of distinctiveness-based illusory correlation: The impact of circadian variations and personal need for structure. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 514-526.
17. Hamilton, D. L., Dugan, P. M., & Trolier, T. K. (1985). The formation of stereotypic beliefs: Further evidence for distinctiveness-based illusory correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 5-17.
18. Hamilton, D. L., & Gifford, R. K. (1976). Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis of stereotypic judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 392-407.
19. Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1989). Illusory correlations: Implications for stereotype theory and research. In D. Bar-Tal, C. F. Graumann, A. W. Kruglanski, & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Stereotype and prejudice:Changing conceptions(pp.59-82). New York: Springer.
20. Hamm, S. (2002). AG-Spanne: Validierung eines deutschsprachigen Verfahrens zur Erfassung der Arbeitsgedächtnisspanne. [AG-Spanne: Validation of a technique for assessing the working memory span in the German language]. Berichte aus dem Psychologischen Institut der Universitat Bonn, 28(2), 1-23.
21. Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258-268.
22. Johnson, C., & Mullen, B. (1994). Evidence for the accessibility of paired distinctiveness in distinctiveness-based illusory correlation in stereotyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 65-70.
23. Kareev, Y. (1995a). Positive bias in the perception of covariation. Psychological Review, 102, 490-502.
24. Kareev, Y. (1995b). Through a narrow window: Working memory capacity and the detection of covariation. Cognition, 56, 263-269.
25. Kareev, Y., Lieberman, I., & Lev, M. (1997). Through a narrow window: Sample size and the perception of correlation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 278-287.
26. Klauer, K. C., & Meiser, T. (2000). A source-monitoring analysis of illusory correlations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1074-1093.
27. McGarty, C., Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1993). Illusory correlation as accentuation of actual intercategory difference: Evidence for the effect with minimal stimulus information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 391-410.
28. Meiser, T., & Hewstone, M. (2006). Illusory and spurious correlations: Distinct phenomena or joint outcomes of exemplar-based category learning? European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 315-336.
29. Mueller, S. T., Seymour, T. L., Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (2003). Theoretical implications of articulatory duration, phonological similarity, and phonological complexity in verbal working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1353-1380.
30. Mullen, B., & Johnson, C. (1990). Distinctiveness-based illusory correlations and stereotyping: A meta-analytic integration. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 11-28.
31. Pryor, J. B. (1986). The influence of different encoding sets upon the formation of illusory correlations and group impressions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 216-226.
32. Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (1987). Illusory correlation in the perception of individuals and groups. Social Cognition, 5, 1-25.
33. Schweickert, R., Guentert, L., & Hersberger, L. (1990). Phonological similarity, pronunciation rate, and memory span. Psychological Science, 1, 74-77.
34. Spears, R., & Haslam, S. A. (1997). Stereotyping and the burden of cognitive load. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 171-207). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
35. Stroessner, S. J., Hamilton, D. L., & Mackie, D. M. (1992). Affect and stereotyping: The effect of induced mood on distinctiveness-based illusory correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62,564-576.
36. Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127-154.
37. Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). On the division of short-term and working memory: An examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1038-1066.
38. Vandierendonck, A., De Vooght, G., & Van der Goten, K. (1998). Interfering with the central executive y means of a random interval repetition task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 197-218.