Actin filaments and microtubules of Arabidopsis suspension cells show different responses to changing turgor pressure

Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

Volumn 405, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 632-637

  Shi, Lanchun ^a   Wang, Bochu ^a   Gong, Wei ^a   Zhang, Yungang ^a   Zhu, Liqing ^a   Yang, Xingyan ^a  

^a CHONGQING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Cytoskeleton; Real time; Suspension culture cells; Turgor

Indexed keywords

ACTIN;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ANIMAL CELL; ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL GROWTH; CELL MATURATION; CELL SUSPENSION; CELL TURGOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOSKELETON; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; MECHANICAL STRESS; MICROFILAMENT; MICROTUBULE; MORPHOGENESIS; NONHUMAN; ORGANOGENESIS; PLANT CELL; PLANT STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SUSPENSION; SUSPENSION CELL CULTURE; TURGOR PRESSURE;

ARABIDOPSIS; CELLS, CULTURED; MICROFILAMENTS; MICROTUBULES; PRESSURE; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; SUSPENSIONS;

ARABIDOPSIS;

EID: 79951958677     PISSN: 0006291X     EISSN: 10902104     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.01.081     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Lockhart J.A. An analysis of irreversible plant cell elongation. J. Theor. Biol. 1965, 8:264-275.
2. Ray P.M., Green P.B., Cleland R. Role of turgor in plant cell growth. Nature 1972, 239:163-164.
3. Proseus T.E., Boyer J.S. Periplasm turgor pressure controls wall deposition and assembly in growing chara corallina Cells. Ann. Bot. 2006, 98:93-105.
4. Geitmann A., Ortega J.K.E. Mechanics and modeling of plant cell growth. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14:467-478.
5. Dumais J., Long S.R., Shaw S.L. The mechanics of surface expansion anisotropy in Medicago truncatula root hairs. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136:3266-3275.
6. Dumais J., Shaw S.L., Steele C.R., Long S.R., Ray P.M. An anisotropic-viscoplastic model of plant cell morphogenesis by tip growth. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2006, 50:209-222.
7. Szymanski D.B., Cosgrove D.J. Dynamic coordination of cytoskeletal and cell wall systems during plant cell morphogenesis. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:800-811.
8. Hamant O., Traas J. The mechanics behind plant development. New Phytol. 2010, 185:369-385.
9. Martin C., Bhatt K., Baumann K. Shaping in plant cells. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001, 4:540-549.
10. Cleary A.L., Hardham A.R. Pressure induced reorientation of cortical microtubules in epidermal cells of Lolium rigidum leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 1993, 34:1003-1008.
11. Wymer C.L., Wymer S.A., Cosgrove D.J., Cyr R.J. Plant cell growth responds to external forces and the response requires intact microtubules. Plant Physiol. 1996, 110:425-430.
12. Hardham A.R., Takemoto D., White R.G. Rapid and dynamic subcellular reorganization following mechanical stimulation of Arabidopsis epidermal cells mimics responses to fungal and oomycete attack. BMC Plant Biol. 2008, 8(63).
13. Mulder B. On growth and force. Science 2008, 322:1643-1644.
14. Dumais J. Plant morphogenesis: a role for mechanical signals. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:207-208.
15. Hamant O., Heisler M.G., Jönsson H., Krupinski P., Uyttewaal M., Bokov P., Corson F., Sahlin P., Boudaoud A., Meyerowitz E.M., Couder Y. J. Traas1, developmental patterning by mechanical signals in Arabidopsis. Science 2008, 322:1650-1655.
16. Voigt B., Timmers A.C.J., Šamaja J., Müller J., Baluška F., Menzel D. GFP-FABD2 fusion construct allows in vivo visualization of the dynamic actin cytoskeleton in all cells of Arabidopsis seedlings. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 84:595-608.
17. Marc J., Granger C.L., Brincat J., Fisher D.D., Kao T., McCubbin A.G., Cyr R.J. A GFP-MAP4 reporter gene for visualizing cortical microtubule rearrangements in living epidermal cells. Plant Cell. 1998, 10:1927-1940.
18. J. Mathur, C. Koncz, Establishment and maintenance of cell suspension cultures, in: J.M. Martínez-Zapater, J. Salinas (Ed.), Arabidopsis protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology, Humana press inc., Totowa, 1998, 82, pp. 27-30.
19. Iwata K., Tazawa M., Itoh T. Turgor pressure regulation and the orientation of cortical microtubules in Spirogyra Cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001, 42:594-598.
20. Dupuy L., Mackenzie J., Rudge T., Haseloff J. A system for modelling cell-cell interactions during plant morphogenesis. Ann Bot. 2008, 101:1255-1265.
21. Komis G., Apostolakos P., Galatis B. Hyperosmotic stress-induced actin filament reorganization in leaf cells of Chlorophyton comosum. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53:1699-1710.
22. Komis G., Apostolakos P., Galatis B. Hyperosmotic stress induces formation of tubulin macrotubules in root-tip cells of Triticum turgidum: their probable involvement in protoplast volume control. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43:911-922.
23. Komis G., Apostolakos P., Galatis B. Actomyosin is involved in the plasmolytic cycle: gliding movement of the deplasmolyzing protoplast. Protoplasma 2003, 221:245-256.
24. Wojtaszek P., Baluska F., Kasprowicz A., Luczak M., Volkmann D. Domain-specific mechanosensory transmission of osmotic and enzymatic cell wall disturbances to the actin cytoskeleton. Protoplasma 2007, 230:217-230.
25. Ehrhardt D. GFP technology for live cell imaging. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6:622-628.
26. Sheahan M.B., Staiger C.J., Rose R.J., McCurdy D.W. A green fluorescent protein fusion to actin-binding domain 2 of Arabidopsis fimbrin highlights new features of a dynamic actin cytoskeleton in live plant cells. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136:3968-3978.
27. Granger C.L., Cyr R.J. Microtubule reorganization in tobacco BY-2 cells stably expressing GFP-MBD. Planta 2000, 210:502-509.
28. Vos J.W., Dogterom M., Emons A.M.C. Microtubules become more dynamic but not shorter during preprophase band formation: a possible " search-and-capture'' mechanism for microtubule translocation. Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 2004, 57:246-258.
29. Monshausen G.B., Gilroy S. Feeling green: mechanosensing in plants. Trends Cell Biol. 2009, 19:228-235.
30. Humphrey T.V., Bonet D.T., Goring D.R. Sentinels at the wall: cell wall receptors and sensors. New Phytol. 2007, 176:7-21.