Sharing qualitative research findings with participants: Study experiences of methodological and ethical dilemmas

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 389-395

  Goldblatt, Hadass ^a   Karnieli Miller, Orit ^a   Neumann, Melanie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Credibility; Ethical dilemmas; Member check; Qualitative research; Trustworthiness

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD ABUSE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SEXUAL ABUSE;

ADOLESCENT; CONFIDENTIALITY; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HEALTH COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCHER-SUBJECT RELATIONS;

EID: 79951945237     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.12.016     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Holloway I., Wheeler S. Qualitative research in nursing 2003, Blackwell, Oxford, Great Britain. 2nd ed.
2. Lincoln Y.S., Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry 1985, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
3. Karnieli-Miller O., Strier R., Pessach L. Power relations in qualitative research. Qual Health Res 2009, 19:279-289.
4. Morse J., Barrett M., Mayan M., Olson K., Spiers J. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods 2002, 2. Article 2 (Retrieved on July 21, 2010 from http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/article/view/4603/3756).
5. Onwuegbuzie A.J., Leech N.L. Validity and qualitative research: an oxymoron?. Qual Quant 2007, 41:233-249.
6. Mays N., Pope C. Assessing quality in qualitative research. Brit Med J 2000, 320:50-52.
7. Schwandt T.A. Dictionary of qualitative inquiry 2007, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 3rd ed.
8. Hagens V., Dobrow M.J., Chafe R. Interviewee Transcript Review: assessing the impact on qualitative research. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009, 9:47. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/9/47.
9. Tobin G.A., Begley C.M. Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. J Adv Nurs 2004, 48:388-396.
10. Karnieli-Miller O., Vu R.T., Holtman M., Clyman S., Inui T.S. Medical student narratives and professionalism: a window on the 'hidden curriculum'. Acad Med 2010, 85:124-133.
11. Merriam S.B. Assessing and evaluating qualitative research. Assessing and evaluating qualitative research in practice 2002, 18-33. Jossy-Bass, San Francisco, CA. S.B. Merriam, Associates (Eds.).
12. Grundy A.L., Pollon D.E., McGinn M.K. The participant as transcriptionist: methodological advantages of a collaborative and inclusive research practice. Int J Qual Methods 2003, 2. Article 3 (Retrieved on April 10, 2010 from: http://www.ualberta.ca/∼iiqm/backissues/2_2/pdf/grundyetal.pdf).
13. Henderson J. 'He's not my carer-he's my husband': personal and policy constructions of care in mental health. J Soc Work Pract 2001, 15:149-159.
14. Menne H.L., Kinney J.M., Morhardt D.J. 'Trying to continue to do as much as they can do': theoretical insights regarding continuity and meaning making in the face of dementia. Dementia 2002, 1:367-382.
15. Apatira L., Boyd E.A., Malvar G., Evans L.R., Luce J.M., Lo B., et al. Hope, Truth, and Preparing for Death: perspectives of surrogate decision makers. Ann Intern Med 2008, 149:861-868.
16. Utley-Smith Q., Bailey D., Ammarell N., Corazzini K., Colón-Emeric C.S., Lekan-Rutledge D., et al. Exit interview-consultation for research validation and dissemination. Western J Nurs Res 2006, 28:955-973.
17. Rew L., Rochlen A.B., Murphey C. Health educators' perceptions of a sexual health intervention for homeless adolescents. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 72:71-77.
18. Chapple A., Ziebland S. Viewing the body after bereavement due to a traumatic death: qualitative study in the UK. Brit Med J 2010, 340:c2032.
19. Hoffart N.A. Member check procedure to enhance rigor in naturalistic research. Western J Nurs Res 1991, 13:522-534.
20. Adams W.L., McIlvain H.E., Lacy N.L., Magsi H., Crabtree B.F., Yenny S.K., et al. Primary care for elderly people: why do doctors find it so hard?. Gerontologist 2002, 42:835-842.
21. Melrose S. Facilitating help-seeking through student interactions in a WebCT online graduate study program. Nurs Health Sci 2006, 8:175-178.
22. Zang L.Y.-L., Chung Y.F., Wong T.K.S. Chinese female nurses' perceptions of male genitalia-related care - part 1. J Clin Nurs 2008, 18:817-825.
23. Creswell J.W., Miller D.L. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2000, 39:124-130.
24. Meadows L.M., Verdi A.J., Crabtree B.F. Keeping up appearances: using qualitative research to enhance knowledge of dental practice. J Dent Educ 2003, 67:981-990.
25. Taylor S.J., Bogdan R. Introduction to qualitative research methods 1998, John Wiley & Sons, New York City.
26. Guba E.G., Lincoln Y.S. Fourth generation evaluation 1989, Sage, New York City.
27. Graneheim U.H., Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurs Educ Today 2004, 24:105-112.
28. Fernandez C.V., Kodish E., Weijer C. Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative. IRB 2003, 25:12-19.
29. MacNeil S.D., Fernandez C.V. Informing research participants of research results: analysis of Canadian university based research ethics board policies. J Med Ethics 2006, 32:49-54.
30. Buchbinder E. Beyond checking: experiences of the validation interview. Qual Soc Work [Internet]. 2011, 17 p. doi:10.1177/1473325010370189.
31. Forbat L., Henderson J. Theoretical and practical reflections on sharing transcripts with participants. Qual Health Res 2005, 15:1114-1128.
32. Hoskins M.L., Stoltz J. Fear of offending: disclosing researcher discomfort when engaging in analysis. Qual Res 2005, 5:95-111.
33. Astin F., Closs S.J., McLenachan J., Hunter S., Priestley C. The information needs of patients treated with primary angioplasty for heart attack: an exploratory study. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 73:325-332.
34. Celik H., Abma T.A., Widdershoven G.A., van Wijmen F.C.B., Klinge I. Implementation of diversity in healthcare practices: barriers and opportunities. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 71:65-71.
35. Swallow V., Lambert H., Clarke C., Campbell S., Jacoby A. Childhood chronic-kidney-disease: a longitudinal-qualitative study of families learning to share management early in the trajectory. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 73:354-362.
36. Deep K.S., Griffith C.H. Wilson JF Discussing preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: what do resident physicians and their hospitalized patients think was decided?. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 72:20-25.
37. Kind T., Everett V.R., Ottolini M. Learning to connect: students' reflections on doctor-patient interactions. Patient Educ Couns 2009, 75:149-154.
38. Calam B., Far S., Andrew R. Discussions of " code status" on a family practice teaching ward: what barriers do family physicians face?. Can Med Assoc J 2000, 163:1255-1259.
39. Founds S.A. Women's and providers' experiences of breech presentation in Jamaica: a qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud 2007, 44:1391-1399.
40. Lincoln Y.S. Emerging criteria for qualitative and interpretive research. Qual Inq 1995, 3:275-289.
41. Goldblatt H. Beyond vicarious trauma discourse: the phenomenology of the experience of professionals working with abuse survivors. Paper presented at: 13th Annual Qualitative Health Research Conference 2007.
42. Karnieli-Miller O. The experiencing of breaking and receiving bad news on chronic illness during adolescence: an insider's perspective of adolescents, parents and physicians [dissertation]. [Haifa]: University of Haifa; 2006. 266 p. Hebrew.
43. Goldblatt H. Strategies of coping among adolescents experiencing interparental violence. J Interpers Violence 2003, 18:532-553.
44. Goldblatt H., Eisikovits Z. Role taking of youths in a family context: adolescents exposed to interparental violence. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2005, 17:644-657.
45. Farmer T., Robinson K., Elliott S.J., Eyles J., Developing implementing a triangulation protocol for qualitative health research. Qual Health Res 2006, 16:377-394.
46. Tzabar-Ben Yehoshua N., Dushnik L. " Whose stories are these?" Ethical coping in the qualitative research. Shviley Mechkar 2006, 13:36-41. Hebrew.
47. Karnieli-Miller O., Eisikovits Z. Physician as salesman or partner?! Shared decision making in real-time encounters. Soc Sci Med 2009, 69:1-8.
48. Jadad A.R., Rizo C.A., Enkin M.W. I am a good patient, believe it or not. Brit Med J 2003, 326:1293-1295.
49. Bingham J. A complaint against " complaints" Ann Intern Med 2003, 138:73-74.
50. Karnieli-Miller O. Triangulation of methods and perspectives for the study of health communication. Paper presented at: American Academy of Communication in Healthcare: Research and Teaching Forum 2010.
51. Denzin N.K. The research act 1970, Aldine Publishing, Chicago, IL.
52. Karnieli-Miller O., Taylor A.C., Cottingham A.H., Inui T.S., Vu T.R., Frankel R.M. Exploring the meaning of respect in medical student education: an analysis of student narratives. J Gen Intern Med 2010, 25:1309-1314.
53. Kahn J.P., Mastrioanni A.C., Sugarman J. Changing claims about justice in research: an introduction and overview. Beyond consent: seeking justice in research 1998, 1-10. Oxford University Press, New York City. J.P. Kahn, A.C. Mastrioanni, J. Sugarman (Eds.).
54. Bradshaw M. Contracts and member checks in qualitative research in human geography: reason for caution?. Area 2001, 33:202-211.