Public preferences for environmental policy responsibility

Publius: The Journal of Federalism

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 76-100

  Konisky, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951938543     PISSN: 00485950     EISSN: 17477107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjp044     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Anderson, Terry Lee, and Peter Jensen Hill. 1997. Environmental federalism. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
2. Arceneaux, Kevin. 2005. Does federalism weaken democratic representation in the United States? Publius: The Journal of Federalism 35 (2): 297-311.
3. Arceneaux, Kevin, and Robert M. Stein. 2006. Who is held responsible when disaster strikes? The attribution of responsibility for a natural disaster in an urban election. Journal of Urban Affairs 28 (1): 43-53.
4. Blendon, Robert J., John M. Benson, Richard Morin, Drew E. Altman, Mollyann Brodie, Mario Brossard, and Matt James. 1997. Changing attitudes in America. In Why people don't trust government, ed. Joseph S. Nye Jr, Philip D. Zelikow, and David C. King, 205-216. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
5. Cantril, Albert H., and Susan Davis Cantril. 1999. Reading mixed signals: Ambivalence in American public opinion about government. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
6. Cole, Richard L., and John Kincaid. 2006. Public opinion on U.S. Federal and intergovernmental issues in 2006: Continuity and change. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 36 (3): 443-459. (Pubitemid 44059571)
7. -. 2000. Public opinion and American federalism: Perspectives on taxes, spending, and trust - An ACIR update. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 20 (1-2): 189-201.
8. Conlan, Timothy J. 1993. Federal, state, or local? Trends in the public's judgment. The Public Perspective January/February: 3-5.
9. Cutler, Fred. 2004. Government responsibility and electoral accountability in Federations. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 34 (2): 19-38 (Pubitemid 40224484)
10. Davies, J. Clarence III. 1970. The politics of pollution. New York: Pegasus.
11. Dunlap, Riley E, and Robert Emmet Jones. 2002. Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. In Handbook of environmental sociology, ed. Riley E. Dunlap, and William Michelson, 482-524. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
12. Esty, Daniel C. 1996. Revitalizing environmental federalism. Michigan Law Review 95 (3): 570-653.
13. Gomez, Brad T., and J. Matthew Wilson. 2008. Political sophistication and attributions of blame in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 38 (4): 633-650.
14. -. 2001. Political sophistication and economic voting in the American electorate: A theory of heterogeneous attribution. American Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 899-914.
15. Harrison, Kathryn. 1996. Passing the buck: Federalism and Canadian environmental policy. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
16. Hetherington, Marc J., and John D. Nugent. 2001. Explaining public support for devolution: The role of political trust. In What is it about government that Americans Dislike? ed. John R. Hibbing, and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse, 134-152. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Kam, Cindy D., and Robert A. Mikos. 2007. Do citizens care about Federalism? An experimental test. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 4 (3): 589-624.
18. Kelleher, Christine A., and Jennifer Wolak. 2007. Explaining public confidence in the branches of state government. Political Research Quarterly 60 (4): 707-721.
19. Konisky, David M., Jeffrey Milyo, and Lilliard E. Richardson Jr. 2008. Environmental policy attitudes: Issues, geographical scale, and political trust. Social Science Quarterly 89 (5): 1066-1085.
20. Kraft, Michael E., and Denise Scheberle. 1998. Environmental federalism at decade's end: New approaches and strategies. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 28 (1): 131-146.
21. Lowry, William R. 1992. The dimensions of federalism: State governments and pollution control policies. Durham: Duke University Press.
22. Maestas, Cherie D., Lonna Rae Atkeson, Thomas Croon, and Lisa A. Bryant. 2008. Shifting the blame: Federalism, media, and public assignment of blame following Hurricane Katrina. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 38 (4): 609-632.
23. Mikos, Robert A. 2007. The populist safeguards of federalism. Ohio State Law Journal 68: 1669-1731.
24. Rabe, Barry G. 2008. States on steroids: The intergovernmental odyssey of American climate policy. Review of Policy Research 25 (2): 105-128
25. Rivers, Douglas. n.d. Representative sample matching from internet surveys. available at http://web .mit.edu/polisci/portl/cces/material/sample- matching.pdf (accessed December 15, 2009).
26. Roeder, Phillip. 1994. Public opinion and policy leadership in the American states. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
27. Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1995. Controlling environmental policy: The limits of public law in Germany and the United States. New Haven: Yale University Press.
28. Rudolph, Thomas J. 2008. Institutional context and the assignment of political responsibility. The Journal of Politics 65 (1): 190-215.
29. -. 2003. Who's responsible for the economy? The formation and consequences of responsibility attributions. American Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 698-713. (Pubitemid 37316232)
30. Schneider, Saundra K., and William G. Jacoby. 2008. Citizen's perceptions of intergovernmental policy responsibilities. Paper prepared for presentation at the 2008 State Politics and Policy Conference. Philadelphia, PA
31. -. 2003. Public attitudes toward policy responsibilities of the national and state governments: Evidence from South Carolina. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 3 (3): 246-269.
32. Shaw, Greg M., and Stephanie L. Reinhart. 2001. The polls-trends: Devolution and confidence in government. Public Opinion Quarterly 65 (3): 369-388.
33. Stewart, Richard B. 1977. Pyramids of sacrifice? Problems of federalism in mandating state implementation of national environmental policy. Yale Law Journal 86: 1196-1272.
34. Thompson, Lyke, and Richard Elling. 1999. Let them eat marblecake: The preferences of Michigan citizens for devolution and intergovernmental service-provision. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 29 (1): 139-153.
35. Uslaner, Eric M. 2001. Is Washington really the problem. In What is it about government that Americans Dislike?, ed. John R. Hibbing, and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse, 118-133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.