Metaphor and minimalism

Philosophical Studies

Volumn 153, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 273-298

  Stern, Josef ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Context dependence; Metaphor; Minimalism; Pragmatics; Semantics

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951868443     PISSN: 00318116     EISSN: 15730883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-009-9486-3     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bezuidenhout, A. (2001). Metaphor and what is said: A defense of a direct expression view of metaphor. In P. A. French & H. K. Wettstein (Eds.), Midwest studies in philosophy (Vol 25): Figurative language (pp. 156-186). Boston, MA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
2. Borg, E. (2004). Minimal semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Camp, E. (2004). The generality constraint, nonsense, and categorial restrictions. Philosophical Quarterly, 54(215), 209-231.
4. Camp, E. (2006). Contextualism, metaphor, and what is said. Mind and Language, 21, 280-309.
5. Camp, E. (2007). Prudent semantics meets wanton SpeechAct pluralism. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (Eds.), Context-sensitivity and semantic minimalism: New essays on semantics and pragmatics (pp. 194-215).
6. Camp, E. (2008). Showing, telling, and seeing: Metaphor and 'poetic' language. The Baltic international yearbook of cognition, logic and communication: A figure of speech (Vol. 3, pp. 1-24). http://www.thebalticyearbook.org/.
7. Cappelan, H., & Lepore, E. (2004). Insensitive semantics: A defense of semantic minimalism and speech act pluralism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
8. Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. London: Blackwell.
9. Castaneda, H.-N. (1967). Indicators and quasi-indicators. The American Philosophical Quarterly, 4, 85-100.
10. Cavell, S. (1967). Aesthetic problems of modern philosophy. In M. Black (Ed.), Philosophy in America (pp. 74-97). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
11. Cohen, T. (1976). Notes on metaphor. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 34, 249-259.
12. Davidson, D. (1984). What metaphors mean. In Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Gentner, D. (1982). Are scientific analogies metaphors? In D. Miall (Ed.), Metaphor: Problems and perspectives (pp. 106-132). Brighten, England: Harvester Press.
14. Gibbs, R., & Tendahl, M. (2006). Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance theory and psycholinguistics. Mind and Language, 21, 379-403.
15. Glanzberg, M. (2008). Metaphor and lexical semantics. The Baltic international yearbook of cognition, logic and communication: A figure of speech (Vol. 3, pp. 1-47). http://www.thebalticyearbook.org/.
16. Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of art (2nd ed.). Hackett: Indianapolis.
17. Jakobson, R. (1981/1957). Metalanguage as a linguistic problem. In The framework of language. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
18. Kaplan, D. (1989). Demonstratives. In J. Almog, J. Perry, & H. Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 481-563). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Kaplan, D. (1990). Words. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 64(suppl), 93-119.
20. King, J. (2001). Complex demonstratives: A quantificational account. Cambridge: MIT Press.
21. King, J., & Stanley, J. (2005). Semantics, pragmatics, and the role of semantic content. In Z. Szabo (Ed.), Semantics vs. pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Levinson, J. (2001). Who's afraid of a paraphrase? Theoria, 67, 7-23.
24. Lewis, D. (1979). Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8, 339-359.
25. Margalit, A., & Goldblum, N. (1994). Metaphors in an open-class test. In J. Hintikka (Ed.), Aspects of metaphor. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
26. Perry, J. (1979). The problem of the essential indexical. Nous, 13, 3-21.
27. Perry, J. (1986). Thought without representation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 60(suppl), 263-283.
28. Preyer, G., & Peter, G. (2007). Context-sensitivity and semantic minimalism: New essays on semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Récanati, F. (2004). Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Récanati, F. (2007). It is raining (somewhere). Linguistics and Philosophy, 30(1), 123-146.
31. Récanati, F. (2010). Pragmatics and logical form. In B. Soria & E. Romero (Eds.), Explicit communication. Robyn Carston's pragmatics. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
32. Reimer, M. (forthcoming). The direct expression of metaphorical content.
33. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
34. Stalnaker, R. (1972). Pragmatics. In D. Davidson & G. Harman (Eds.), Semantics of natural language (pp. 380-397). Dordrecht: Reidel.
35. Stanley, J. (2000). Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy, 23, 391-434.
36. Stanley, J. (2002). Making it articulated. Mind and Language, 17(1& 2), 149-168.
37. Stanley, J. (2005). Semantics in context. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (Eds.), Contextualism in philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Stanley, J., & Szabo, Z. (2000). On quantifer domain restriction. Mind and Language, 15, 219-261.
39. Stern, J. (1983). Metaphor and grammatical deviance. Nous, 17, 577-599.
40. Stern, J. (2000). Metaphor in context. Cambridge: MIT Press.
41. Stern, J. (2006). Metaphor, literal, literalism. Mind and Language, 21(3), 243-279.
42. Taylor, K. (2007). A little sensitivity goes a long way. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (Eds.), Context-sensitivity and semantic minimalism: New essays on semantics and pragmatics (pp. 63-93).
43. Tirrell, L. (1989). Extending: The structure of metaphor. Nous, 23, 17-34.
44. Travis, C. (2000). Unshadowed thought. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
45. Wearing, C. (2006). Metaphor and what is said. Mind and Language, 21(3), 310-332.
46. White, R. W. (1996). The Structure of metaphor: The way the language of metaphor works. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
47. Wilson, M. (2006). Wandering significance: An essay on conceptual behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.