Contextualism, metaphor, and what is said

Mind and Language

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 280-309

  Camp, Elisabeth ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744734296     PISSN: 02681064     EISSN: 14680017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00279.x     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Austin, J. L. 1962: How To Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Bach, K. 2001: Speaking loosely: sentence nonliterality. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 25, 249-263.
3. Bach, K. 1999: The Semantics-pragmatics distinction: what it is and why it matters. In K. Turner (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface From Different Points of View. New York: Elsevier.
4. Bach, K. 1994: Conversational impliciture. Mind & Language, 9, 124-62.
5. Bezuidenhout, A. 2001a: Radical pragmatics. In M. O'Rourke, D. Schier, and J. Campbell (eds), Topics in Contemporary Philosophy: Meaning and Truth. New York: Seven Bridges Press.
6. Bezuidenhout, A. 2001b: Metaphor and what is said: a defense of a direct expression view of metaphor. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 25, 156-186.
7. Blasko, D. and C. Connine 1993: Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 295-308.
8. Bowdle, B. and D. Gentner 2005: The career of metaphor. Psycliological Review, 112, 193-216.
9. Brandom R. 1983: Asserting. Noûs, 17, 637-650.
10. Brisard, F., S. Frisson and D. Sandra 2001: Processing unfamiliar metaphors in a selfpaced reading task. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 87-108.
11. Camp, E. 2006: Metaphor and that certain 'je ne sais quoi'. Philosophical Studies (forthcoming).
12. Cappelen, H. and E. Lepore 1997: On an alleged connection between indirect speech and the theory of meaning. Mind & Language, 12, 278-296.
13. Carston, R. 2002: Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
14. Carston, R. 1999: The semantics/pragmatics distinction: a view from relevance theory. In K. Turner (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View. London: Elsevier Science.
15. Clark, H. 1983: Making sense of nonce sense. In G.B. Flores d'Arcais and R. J. Jarvella (eds), The Process of Language Understanding. London: Wiley.
16. Cohen, T. 1976: Notes on Metaphor. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 34, 249-259.
17. Crimmins, M. 1998: Hesperus and Phosphorus: sense, pretense, and reference. Philosophical Review, 107, 1-47.
18. Davidson, D. 1986: A nice derangement of epitaphs. In E. Lepore (ed.), Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson. Oxford: Blackwell.
19. García-Carpintero, M. 2001: Gricean rational reconstructions and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Synthese, 128, 93-131.
20. Giora, R. 2003: On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Giora, R. 2002: Literal v. figurative language: different or equal? Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 487-506.
22. Giora, R. 1997: Understanding figurative and literal language: the graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8: 183-206.
23. Green, M. 2000: Illocutionary force and semantic content. Linguistics and Philosophy, 23, 435-473.
24. Grice, H. P. 1975: Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds), Speech Acts: Syntax and Semantics vol. 3. New York: Academic Press.
25. Grice, H. P. 1989: Utterer's meaning and intentions. In Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Hills, D. 1997: Aptness and truth in verbal metaphor. Philosophical Topics, 25, 117-153.
27. Horn, L. 1985: Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language, 61, 121-174.
28. Kempson, R. 1986: Ambiguity and the semantics-pragmatics distinction. In C. Travis (ed.), Meaning and Interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell.
29. Langdon, R., M. Davies and M. Coltheart: Understanding minds and understanding communicated meanings in schizophrenia. Mind & Language, 17, 68-104.
30. Levinson, S. 2000: Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
31. Lewis, D. 1979: Scorekeeping in a language game, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8, 339-359.
32. Lewis, D. 1983: Languages and language. In Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Martinich, A. 1984: A theory for metaphor. Journal of Literary Semantics, 13, 35-56.
34. Perry, J. 1986: Thought without representation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. 60, 263-283.
35. Recanati, P. 2004: Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Recanati, F. 2001: Literal/nonliteral. Midwest Studies in Philosopliy, 25, 264-274.
37. Recanati, P. 1995: The alleged priority of literal interpretation. Cognitive Science, 19, 207-232.
38. Sadock, J. 1978: On testing for conversational implicature. In P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.
39. Saul, J. 2002: What is said and psychological reality: Grice's project and relevance theorists' criticisms. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25, 347-372.
40. Searle, J. 1979: Metaphor. In Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Soames, S. 2002: Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Stanley, J. 2000: Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy, 23, 391-434.
43. Stern, J. 2000: Metaphor in Context. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Tsohatzidis S. 1994: Speaker meaning, sentence meaning and metaphor. In S. L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. London: Routledge.