Ethical issues with the disclosure of surgical trial short-term data

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 125-131

  Allardyce, Randall A ^a   Bagshaw, Philip F ^a   Frampton, Christopher M ^a   Frizelle, Francis A ^a   Hewett, Peter J ^b,c,d   Rieger, Nicholas A ^b,c   Smith, J Shona ^d   Solomon, Michael J ^e,f   Stevenson, Andrew R L ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^d Academy of Endosurgery   (New Zealand)

^e ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^g ROYAL BRISBANE AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Confirmatory evidence; Data monitoring committee; Monitoring guideline; Randomized controlled trial; Surgery research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFIDENTIALITY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ETHICS; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT RIGHT; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STANDARD;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CLINICAL TRIALS DATA MONITORING COMMITTEES; CONFIDENTIALITY; DISCLOSURE; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT ACCESS TO RECORDS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 79951841366     PISSN: 14451433     EISSN: 14452197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05433.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Grant AM, Altman DG, Babiker AB etal. Damocles Study Group. Issues in data monitoring and interim analyses of trials. Health Technol. Assess. 2005; 9: 1-246.
2. National Institutes of Health. Policy for Data and Safety Monitoring. [Cited 3 Dec 2009 Available from URL:
3. World Health Organisation. Operational Guidelines for the Establishment and Functioning of Data and Safety Monitoring Boards. [Cited 3 Dec 2009 Available from URL:
4. European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. Guideline on Data Monitoring Committees. [Cited 3 Dec 2009 Available from URL:
5. FDA. Guidance for clinical trial sponsors: On the establishment and operation of clinical trial data monitoring committees. [Cited 3 Dec 2009 Available from URL:
6. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington: Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, 1978; U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. 45 C.F.R. Part 46 (Nov 2001).
7. Marron JM, Siegler M. Ethical issues in innovative colorectal surgery. Dis. Colon Rectum 2005; 48:1109-13.
8. Park IJ, Choi GS, Lim KH, Kang BM, Jun SH. Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: lessons from 1000 cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg. Endosc. 2009; 23: 839-46.
9. The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004; 350: 2050-9.
10. Kobayashi H, Mochizuki H, Sugihara K etal. Characteristics of recurrence and surveillance tools after curative resection for colorectal cancer: a multicenter study. Surgery 2007; 141: 67-75.
11. COLOR Study Group. COLOR: a randomised clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer. Dig. Surg. 2000; 17: 617-22.
12. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H etal. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365: 1718-26.
13. Ellenberg SS, Fleming TR, DeMets DL. Data Monitoring Committees in Clinical Trials: A Practical Perspective. Chichester, West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons, LTD, 2002.
14. Green SJ, Fleming TR, O'Fallon JR. Policies for study monitoring and interim reporting of results. J. Clin. Oncol. 1987; 5: 2477-84.
15. Bernard HR, Hartman TW. Complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am. J. Surg. 1993; 165: 533-5.
16. Davidoff AM, Pappas TN, Murray EA etal. Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann. Surg. 1992; 215: 196-202.
17. Anonymous. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The Southern Surgeons Club. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991; 324: 1073-8.
18. Fleming TR, Sharples K, McCall J, Moore A, Rodgers A, Stewart R. Maintaining confidentiality of interim data to enhance trial integrity and credibility. Clin. Trials 2008; 5: 157-67.
19. Weeks JC, Nelson HN, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroedeer G for the Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group. Short term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted versus open colectomy for colon cancer. JAMA 2002; 287: 321-8.
20. The COLon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005; 6: 477-84.
21. Curet MJ. Laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma. Lancet 2005; 365: 1666-8.
22. Leung KL, Kwok SPY, Lam SCW etal. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 1187-92.
23. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S etal. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 2224-9.
24. Abrams D, Goldman A, Launer C etal. A comparative trial of didanosine or zalcitabine after treatment with zidovudine in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 1994; 330: 657-62.
25. Korn EL, Hunsberger S, Freidlin B, Smith MA, Abrams JS. Preliminary data release for randomized clinical trials of noninferiority: a new proposal. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005; 23: 5831-6.
26. Hahnloser D, Nelson H. Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer. Minerva Chir. 2003; 58: 431-8.
27. Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF etal. Short-term outcomes of the Australasian, randomized, clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments of colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann. Surg. 2008; 248: 728-38.
28. ADAPT Research Group. Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in the randomized controlled Alzheimer's disease anti-inflammatory prevention trial (ADAPT). PLoS Clinical Trials 2006;1:e33.
29. Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, Frampton CM etal. Australian and New Zealand study comparing laparoscopic and open surgeries for colon cancer in adults: organization and conduct. ANZ J. Surg. 2008; 78: 840-7.
30. Rider WD, Palmer JA, Mahoney LJ, Robertson CT. Preoperative irradiation in operable cancer of the rectum: report of the Toronto trial. Can. J. Surg. 1977; 20: 335-8.
31. Escudier B, Eisen T, Stadler WM etal. for the TARGET Study Group. Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007; 356: 125-34.
32. Moseley JB, O'Malley K, Petersen NJ etal. A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002; 347: 81-8.
33. Tharmanathan P, Calvert M, Hampton J, Freemantle N. The use of interim data and Data Monitoring Committee recommendations in randomized controlled trial reports: frequency, implications and potential sources of bias. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2008; 8: 12-20.