On the analysis of combined experiments

Weed Technology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 165-169

  Blouin, David C ^a   Webster, Eric P ^a   Bond, Jason A ^b  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL CENTER   (United States)

^b MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fixed effect; interaction; mixed model; predictable function; random effect

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; NUMERICAL MODEL; POPULATION MODELING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 79951804264     PISSN: 0890037X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WT-D-10-00047.1     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Blouin, D. C., J. D. Taverner, and J. S. Beasley. 2009. A composite latin rectangle and nonstandard strip block design. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 14:484-494.
2. Brien, C. J. and R. A. Bailey. 2006. Multiple randomizations (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. B 68:571-609.
3. Brien, C. J. and C.G.B. Demetrio. 2009. Formulating mixed models for experiments, including longitudinal experiments. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 14:253-280.
4. Carmer, S. G., W. E. Nyquist, and W. M. Walker. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analyses of experiments with two- or three-factor treatment designs. Agron. J. 81:665-672.
5. Cochran, W. G. and G. M. Cox. 1957. Experimental Designs. New York: Wiley.
6. Federer, W. T. and F. King. 2007. Variations on split plot and split block experiment designs. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
7. Hager, A. G., L. M. Wax, G. A. Bollero, and E. W. Stoller. 2003. Influence of diphenylether herbicide application rate and timing on common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 17:14-20.
8. Littell, R. C., G. A. Milliken, W. W. Stroup, R. D. Wolfinger, and O. Schabenbrger. 2006. SAS for Mixed Models. 2nd ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
9. Liu, X. and S. Raudenbush. 2004. A note on the noncentrality parameter and effect size determination for the F test in ANOVA. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 29:251-255.
10. McIntosh, M. S. 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Agron. J. 75:153-155.
11. McLean, R. A. 1989. An introduction to general linear models. Pages 9-38 in Applications of Mixed Models in Agriculture and Related Disciplines. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin No. 343. Baton Rouge: Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station.
12. McLean, R. A., W. L. Sanders, and W. W. Stroup. 1991. A unified approach to mixed linear models. Am. Statistician 45:54-64.
13. Milliken, G. A. and D. E. Johnson. 1984. Analysis of Messy Data. Volume I: Designed Experiments. Belmont, CA: Lifetime Learning.
14. Monlezun, C. R., D. C. Blouin, and L. C. Malone. 1984. Contrasting split plot and repeated measures experiments and analyses (with discussion). Am. Statistician 38:21-31.
15. Redfearn, D. D., B. C. Venuto, W. D. Pitman, D. C. Blouin, and M. W. Alison. 2005. Multilocation annual ryegrass cultivar performance over a twelve-year period. Crop Sci. 45:2388-2393.
16. Sanders, W. L. 1989. Choice of models. Pages 49-53. in Applications of Mixed Models in Agriculture and Related Disciplines. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin No. 343. Baton Rouge: Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station.
17. SAS. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 8, Volume 2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
18. SAS. 2000. SAS Language Reference: Dictionary, Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
19. Schabenberger, O. and F. J. Pierce. 2002. Contemporary statistical models for the plant and soil sciences. New York: CRC Press.
20. Shukla, G. K. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 29:237-245.
21. Steel, R.G.D. and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
22. Stroup, W. W. 1989a. Why mixed models? Pages 1-8. in Applications of Mixed Models in Agriculture and Related Disciplines. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin No. 343. Baton Rouge: Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station.
23. Stroup, W. W. 1989b. Predictable functions and prediction space in the mixed model procedure. Pages 39-48 in Applications of Mixed Models in Agriculture and Related Disciplines. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin No. 343. Baton Rouge: Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station.
24. Yang, R. C. 2007. Mixed-model analysis of crossover genotype-environment interactions. Crop Sci. 47:1051-1062.