Mixed-model analysis of crossover genotype-environment interactions

Crop Science

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 1051-1062

  Yang, Rong Cai ^a,b  

^a ALBERTA AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HORDEUM; HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE; PISUM SATIVUM; POLYOMMATINAE;

EID: 34548187465     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2006.09.0611     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Azzalini, A., and D.R. Cox. 1984. Two new tests associated with analysis of variance. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 46:335-343.
2. Baker, R.J. 1988. Tests for crossover genotype-environmental interactions. Can J. Plant Sci. 68:405-410.
3. Baker, R.J. 1996. Recent research on genotype-environmental interaction. p. 235-239. In Proc. Int. Oat Conf., 5th, and Int. Barley Genet. Symp., 7th, Saskatoon. Vol. 1. Univ. Ext. Press, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.
4. Balzarini, M. 2002. Applications of mixed models in plant breeding. p. 353-363. In M.S. Kang (ed.) Quantitative genetics, genomics, and plant breeding. CAB Int., Wallingford, UK.
5. Casanoves, F., R. Macchiavelli, and M. Balzarini. 2005. Error variation in multienvironment peanut trials: Within-trial spatial correlation and between-trial heterogeneity. Crop Sci. 45:1927-1933.
6. Cornelius, P.L., and J. Crossa. 1999. Prediction assessment of shrinkage estimators of multiplicative models for multi-environment cultivar trials. Crop Sci. 39:998-1009.
7. Cornelius, P.L., M. Seyedsadr, and J. Crossa. 1992. Using the shifted multiplicative model to search for "separability" in crop cultivar trials. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84:161-172.
8. Cotes, J.M., J. Crossa, A. Sanches, and P.L. Cornelius. 2006. A Bayesian approach for assessing the stability of genotypes. Crop Sci. 46:2654-2665.
9. Crossa, J., J. Burgueno, P.L. Cornelius, G. McLaren, R. Trethowan, and A. Krishnamachari. 2006. Modeling genotype x environment interaction using additive genetic covariances of relatives for predicting breeding values of wheat genotypes. Crop Sci. 461:1722-1733.
10. Crossa, J., R.-C. Yang, and P.L. Cornelius. 2004. Studying cross-over genotype x environment interaction using linear-bilinear models and mixed models. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 9:362-380.
11. Edwards, J.W., and J.-L. Jannink. 2006. Bayesian modeling of heterogeneous error and genotype x environment interaction variances. Crop Sci. 46:820-833.
12. Field Crop Development Centre. 2006. Cereal Research Report. Available at www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/fcd5464/$FILE/ 006_ResearchReport_Web.pdf (verified 11 Mar. 2007). Field Crop Development Centre, Lacombe, AB.
13. Gauch, H.G. 2006. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Sci. 46:1488-1500.
14. Gregorius, H.-R., and G. Namkoong. 1986. Joint analysis of genotypic and environmental effects. Theor. Appl. Genet. 72:413-422.
15. Haldane, J.B.S. 1947. The interaction of nature and nurture. Ann. Eugen. 13:197-205.
16. Harville, D.A., and D.R. Jeske. 1992. Mean squared error of estimation or prediction under a general linear model. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 87:724-731.
17. Helm, J., P. Juskiw, and T. Duggan. 2004. Presentation: A new look at location yield data. Available at www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/ deptdocs.nsf/all/fcd5590 (verified 9 Mar. 2007). Alberta Agric. and Food, Edmonton.
18. Henderson, C.R. 1984. Applications of linear models in animal breeding. Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, AB.
19. Kennedy, B.W. 1991. C.R. Henderson: The unfinished legacy. J. Dairy Sci. 74:4067-4081.
20. Kenward, M.G., and J.H. Roger. 1997. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53:983-997.
21. Littell, R.C., G.A. Milliken, W.W. Stroup, R.D. Wolfinger, and O. Schabenberger. 2006. SAS for mixed models. 2nd ed. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
22. McLean, R.A., and W.L. Sanders. 1988. Approximating degrees of freedom for standard errors in mixed linear models. p. 50-59. In Proc. Stat. Comput. Sect., New Orleans, LA. Am. Stat. Assoc. Alexandria, VA.
23. McLean, R.A., W.L. Sanders, and W.W. Stroup. 1991. A unified approach to mixed linear models. Am. Stat. 45:54-64.
24. Navabi, A., R.-C. Yang, J. Helm, and D.M. Spaner. 2006. Can spring wheat-growing megaenvironments in the northern Great Plains be dissected for representative locations or niche-adapted genotypes? Crop Sci. 46:1107-1116.
25. Piepho, H.P. 1998. Methods for comparing the yield stability of cropping systems: A review. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 180:193-213.
26. Prasad, N.G.N., and J.N.K. Rao. 1990. The estimation of mean squared error of small-area estimators. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 85:163-171.
27. Qiao, C.G., K.E. Basford, I.H. DeLacy, and M. Cooper. 2004. Advantage of single-trial models for response to selection in wheat breeding multi-environment trials. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108:1256-1264.
28. Robinson, G.K. 1991. That BLUP is a good thing: The estimation of random effects. Stat. Sci. 6:15-51.
29. SAS Institute. 2004. SAS OnlineDoc 9.1.3. Available at support. sas.com/onlinedoc/913/docMainpage.jsp (verified 9 Mar. 2007). SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
30. Schaeffer, L.R. 2006. ANSC 637. Set 7: Prediction theory. Available at www.aps.uoguelph.ca/~lrs/ANSC637/LRS07/LRS07.pdf (verified 9 Mar. 2007). Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON.
31. Searle, S.R., G. Casella, and C.E. McCulloch. 1992. Variance components. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
32. Self, S.G., and K.Y. Liang. 1987. Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82:605-610.
33. Smith, A.B., B.R. Cullis, and R. Thompson. 2005. The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: An overview of current mixed model approaches. J. Agric. Sci. 143:449-462.
34. Stroup, W.W. 1989. Predictable functions and prediction space in the mixed model procedure. p. 39-48. In Applications of mixed models in agriculture and related disciplines. South. Coop. Ser. Bull. 343. Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn., Baton Rouge.
35. Yan, W., and N.A. Tinker. 2006. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications. Can. J. Plant Sci. 86:623-645.
36. Yang, R.-C. 2002. Likelihood-based analysis of genotype-environment interactions. Crop Sci. 42:1434-1440.
37. Yang, R.-C., and R.J. Baker. 1991. Genotype-environment interactions in two wheat crosses. Crop Sci. 31:83-87.
38. Yang, R.-C., S.F. Blade, J. Crossa, D. Stanton, and M.S. Bandara. 2005. Identifying isoyield environments for field pea production. Crop Sci. 45:106-113.
39. Yang, R.-C., D. Stanton, S.F. Blade, J. Helm, D. Spaner, S. Wright, and D. Domitruk. 2006. Isoyield analysis of barley cultivar trials in the Canadian prairies. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 192:284-294.