Let's find the evidence: An analogue study of confirmation bias in criminal investigations

Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 231-246

  Rassin, Eric ^a   Eerland, Anita ^a   Kuijpers, Ilse ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Confirmation bias; Criminal investigation; Decision making; Tunnel vision

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951801485     PISSN: 15444759     EISSN: 15444767     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jip.126     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ask, K., & Granhag, P. A. (2005). Motivational sources of confirmation bias in criminal investigations: The need for cognitive closure. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 2, 43-63.
2. Ask, K., Rebelius, A., & Granhag, P. A. (2008). The 'elasticity' of evidence: A moderator of investigator bias. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1245-1259.
3. Bright, D. A., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2004). The influence of gruesome verbal evidence on mock juror verdicts. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 11, 154-166.
4. Carlson, K. A., & Russo, J. E. (2001). Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 91-103.
5. De Keijser, J. W., & van Koppen, P. J. (2007). Paradoxes of proof and punishment: Psychological pitfalls in judicial decision making. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 189-205.
6. Dror, I. E., Péron, A. E., Hind, S. L., & Charlton, D. (2005). When emotions get the better of us: The effect of contextual top-down processing on matching fingerprints. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 799-809.
7. Dror, I. E., Charlton, D., & Péron, A. E. (2006). Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications. Forensic Science International, 156, 74-78.
8. Findley, K. A., & Scott, M. S. (2006). The multiple dimensions of tunnel vision in criminal cases. Wisconsin Law Review, 2, 291-397.
9. Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2001). Criminal interrogation and confessions. Gaithersburg: Aspen Publishers.
10. Jenkins, G., & Schuller, R. A. (2007). The impact of negative forensic evidence on mock juror's perceptions of a trial of drug-facilitated sexual assault. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 369-380.
11. Jervis, R. (2006). Reports, politics, and intelligence failures: The case of Iraq. The Journal of Strategic Studies, 29, 3-52.
12. Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., & Thelen, N. (2001). Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 557-571.
13. Kalven, H., & Zeisel, H. (1966). The American jury. Boston: Little brown.
14. Kassin, S. M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60, 215-228.
15. Kassin, S. M., Goldstein, C. C., & Savitsky, K. (2003). Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: On the dangers of presuming guilt. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 187-203.
16. Kerstholt, J. H., & Eikelboom, A. R. (2007). Effects of prior interpretation on situation assessment in crime analysis. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20, 455-465.
17. Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979) Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
18. McKenzie, C. R. M., Lee, S. M., & Chen, K. K. (2002). When negative evidence increases confidence: Change in belief after hearing two sides of a dispute. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 1-18.
19. Meissner, C. A., & Kassin, S. M. (2002). 'He's guilty!': Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 469-480.
20. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175-220.
21. O'Brien, B. (2009). Prime suspect: An examination of factors that aggravate and counteract confirmation bias in criminal investigations. Psychology, Public policy, and Law, 15, 315-334.
22. Posthumus, F. (2005). Evaluatieonderzoek in de Schiedammer parkmoord [Evaluation in the Schiedam park murder]. Den Haag: Openbaar ministerie.
23. Rassin, E. (2010). Blindness to alternative scenarios in evidence evaluation. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7, 153-163.
24. Schünemann, B., & Bandilla, W. (1989). Perseverance in courtroom decisions. In H. Wegener, F. Lösel, & J. Haisch (Eds.), Criminal behavior and the justice system: Psychological perspectives (pp. 181-192). New York: Springer.
25. Simon, D., Snow, C. J., & Read, S. J. (2004). The redux of cognitive consistency theories: Evidence judgments by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 814-837.
26. Snook, B., & Cullen, R. M. (2008). Bounded rationality and criminal investigations: Has tunnel vision been wrongfully convicted? In D. K. Rossmo (Ed.), Criminal investigative failures (pp. 71-98). Boca Raton: CRC press, Taylor & Francis Group.
27. Snyder, M., & Swann, W. B. (1978). Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1202-1212.
28. Wason, P. C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 273-281.