Comparison of mri-based estimates of articular cartilage contact area in the tibiofemoral joint

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

Volumn 133, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Henderson, Christopher E ^a   Higginson, Jill S ^a   Barrance, Peter J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b KESSLER FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Contact area; Magnetic resonance imaging; Osteoarthritis

Indexed keywords

ARTICULAR CARTILAGES; CONTACT AREAS; FUNCTIONAL ABILITIES; IMAGING DATA; IN-VIVO; KNEE FLEXION ANGLE; KNEE FLEXIONS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MECHANICAL STRESS; MODELING METHOD; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PEARSON'S CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS; RELIABILITY AND SENSITIVITY; TIBIO-FEMORAL JOINTS;

CARTILAGE; CORRELATION METHODS; DATA HANDLING; ESTIMATION; LIGAMENTS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; RELIABILITY; RESONANCE; STRESSES;

JOINTS (ANATOMY);

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; CASE REPORT; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MECHANICAL STRESS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TIBIA; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HISTOLOGY; KNEE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE;

EID: 79951765840     PISSN: 01480731     EISSN: 15288951     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.4002938     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Buckwalter J.A. Saltzman C. Brown T. The Impact of Osteoarthritis: Implications for Research. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2004, 427S:S6-15. CORTBR, 0009-921X, 10.1097/01.blo.0000143938.30681.9d.
2. Brandt K.D. Dieppe P. Radin E.L. Etiopathogenesis of Osteoarthritis. Rheum. Dis. Clin. North Am. 2008, 34(3):531-559. ZZZZZZ, 0889-857X, 10.1016/j.rdc.2008.05.011.
3. Zhao D. Banks S.A. Mitchell K.H. D'Lima D.D. Colwell Jr. C.W. Fregly B.J. Correlation Between the Knee Adduction Torque and Medial Contact Force for a Variety of Gait Patterns. J. Orthop. Res. 2007, 25(6):789-797. JOREDR, 0736-0266, 10.1002/jor.20379.
4. Miyazaki T. Wada M. Kawahara H. Sato M. Baba H. Shimada S. Dynamic Load at Baseline Can Predict Radiographic Disease Progression in Medial Compartment Knee Osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2002, 61(7):617-622. ARDIAO, 0003-4967, 10.1136/ard.61.7.617.
5. Fukubayashi T. Kurosawa H. The Contact Area and Pressure Distribution Pattern of the Knee: A Study of Normal and Osteoarthrotic Knee Joints. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1980, 51(1-6):871-879. AOSAAK, 0001-6470, 10.3109/17453678008990887.
6. Kettelkamp D.B. Jacobs A.W. Tibiofemoral Contact Area-Determination and Implications. J. Bone Jt. Surg., Am. Vol. 1972, 54(2):349-356. JBJSA3, 0021-9355.
7. Hinterwimmer S. Gotthardt M. von Eisenhart-Rothe R. Sauerland S. Siebert M. Vogl T. Eckstein F. Graichen H. In Vivo Contact Areas of the Knee in Patients With Patellar Subluxation. J. Biomech. 2005, 38(10):2095-2101. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.008.
8. Shefelbine S.J. Ma C.B. Lee K.Y. Schrumpf M.A. Patel P. Safran M.R. Slavinsky J.P. Majumdar S. MRI Analysis of In Vivo Meniscal and Tibiofemoral Kinematics in ACL-Deficient and Normal Knees. J. Orthop. Res. 2006, 24(6):1208-1217. JOREDR, 0736-0266, 10.1002/jor.20139.
9. Segal N.A. Anderson D.D. Iyer K.S. Baker J. Torner J.C. Lynch J.A. Felson D.T. Lewis C.E. Brown T.D. Baseline Articular Contact Stress Levels Predict Incident Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis Development in the MOST Cohort. J. Orthop. Res. 2009, 27(12):1562-1568. JOREDR, 0736-0266, 10.1002/jor.20936.
10. Besier T.F. Draper C.E. Gold G.E. Beaupré G.S. Delp S.L. Patellofemoral Joint Contact Area Increases With Knee Flexion and Weight-Bearing. J. Orthop. Res. 2005, 23(2):345-350. JOREDR, 0736-0266, 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.08.003.
11. Gold G.E. Besier T.F. Draper C.E. Asakawa D.S. Delp S.L. Beaupre G.S. Weight-Bearing MRI of Patellofemoral Joint Cartilage Contact Area. J. Magn. Reson Imaging 2004, 20(3):526-530. ZZZZZZ, 1053-1807, 10.1002/jmri.20146.
12. Patel V.V. Hall K. Ries M. Lotz J. Ozhinsky E. Lindsey C. Lu Y. Majumdar S. A Three-Dimensional MRI Analysis of Knee Kinematics. J. Orthop. Res. 2004, 22(2):283-292. JOREDR, 0736-0266, 10.1016/j.orthres.2003.08.015.
13. Barrance P. Pepe T.M. Buchanan T.S. In Vivo Kinematics Measured in Weight-Bearing Flexion Using Standing Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Proceedings of the 2005 Summer Bioengineering Conference 2005, and , Vail, CO.
14. Barrance P.J. Buchanan T.S. Knee Cartilage Contact Determination Using Weightbearing MRI. Proceedings of the 2006 Summer Bioengineering Conference 2006, and , Amelia Island, FL.
15. Barrance P.J. Benoit D.L. Twomey J. Buchanan T.S. MRI-Based Modeling of Changes in Knee Positioning and Cartilage Contact Related to Injury and Weightbearing. Proceedings of the 2006 World Congress of Biomechanics 2006, and , Munich, Germany.
16. Barrance P. Pohl M. Noehren B. Barrios J. Davis I. Bone Surface Tracking for Standing Knee MRI: A Validation Study. Proceedings of the 2007 American Society of Biomechanics Annual Conference 2007, 1-10, Stanford, CA.
17. Kremer J.R. Mastronarde D.N. McIntosh J.R. Computer Visualization of Three-Dimensional Image Data Using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 1996, 116(1):71-76. JSBIEM, 1047-8477, 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0013.
18. Grood E.S. Suntay W.J. A Joint Coordinate System for the Clinical Description of Three-Dimensional Motions: Application to the Knee. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 1983, 105(2):136-144. JBENDY, 0148-0731, 10.1115/1.3138397.
19. Périé D. Hobatho M.C. In Vivo Determination of Contact Areas and Pressure of the Femorotibial Joint Using Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 1998, 13(6):394-402. ZZZZZZ, 0268-0033, 10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00091-6.