Baseline articular contact stress levels predict incident symptomatic knee osteoarthritis development in the MOST cohort

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 27, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1562-1568

  Segal, Neil A ^a,b   Anderson, Donald D ^a,c   Iyer, Krishna S ^a,c   Baker, Jennifer ^a   Torner, James C ^c,d   Lynch, John A ^e   Felson, David T ^f   Lewis, Cora E ^g   Brown, Thomas D ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c IA United States   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Epidemiology; Knee; Osteoarthritis; Risk

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS; BODY WEIGHT; CONTACT STRESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; KNEE; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PAIN; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; LIMB; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGIDITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; WEIGHT BEARING;

AGED; ARTHROGRAPHY; BONE MALALIGNMENT; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KNEE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RISK FACTORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STRESS, MECHANICAL; UNITED STATES; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 72049105631     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20936     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, et al. 2008. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arth Rheum 58:26-35.
2. Fried LP, Guralnik JM. 1997. Disability in older adults: evidence regarding significance, etiology, and risk. J Am Geriatr Soc 45:92-100.
3. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, et al. 1995. Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med 332:556-561.
4. Hochberg MC, Kasper J, Williamson J, et al. 1995. The contribution of osteoarthritis to disability: preliminary data from the Women's Health and Aging Study. J Rheumatol Suppl 43:16-18.
5. Felson DT. 2004. Risk factors for osteoarthritis: understanding joint vulnerability. Clin Ortho Rel Res 427:S16-S21. (Pubitemid 39362795)
6. Fermor B, Jeffcoat D, Hennerbichler A, et al. 2004. The effects of cyclic mechanical strain and tumor necrosis factor alpha on the response of cells of the meniscus. Osteoarth Cart 12:956-962. (Pubitemid 39618450)
7. Martin JA, Brown TD, Heiner AD, et al. 2004. Chondrocyte senescence, joint loading and osteoarthritis. Clin Ortho Rel Res 427:S96-S103.
8. Fink C, Fermor B, Weinberg JB, et al. 2001. The effect of dynamic mechanical compression on nitric oxide production in the meniscus. Osteoarth Cart 9:481-487. (Pubitemid 32734351)
9. D'Lima DD, Hashimoto S, Chen PC, et al. 2001. Impact of mechanical trauma on matrix and cells. Clin Ortho Rel Res 391:S90-S99. (Pubitemid 32954015)
10. Beillas P, Papaioannou G, Tashman S, et al. 2004. A new method to investigate in vivo knee behavior using a finite element model of the lower limb. J Biomech 37:1019-1030. (Pubitemid 38686326)
11. Li G, Sakamoto M, Chao EY. 1997. A comparison of different methods in predicting static pressure distribution in articulating joints. J Biomech 30:635-638. (Pubitemid 27214196)
12. Kothari M, Guermazi A, von Ingersleben G, et al. 2004. Fixed-flexion radiography of the knee provides reproducible joint space width measurements in osteoarthritis. Eur Radiol 14:1568-1573. (Pubitemid 39232885)
13. Altman RD, Hochberg M, Murphy WA Jr, et al. 1995. Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis. Osteoarth Cart 3 Suppl A:3-70.
14. Segal NA, Felson DT, Torner JC, et al. 2007. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome: epidemiology and associated factors. Arch Phys Med Rehab 88:988-992. (Pubitemid 47126390)
15. Roemer FW, Guermazi A, Lynch JA, et al. 2005. Short tau inversion recovery and proton density-weighted fat suppressed sequences for the evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee with a 1.0 T dedicated extremity MRI: development of a time-efficient sequence protocol. Eur Radiol 15:978-987. (Pubitemid 41166731)
16. Moro-oka TA, Hamai S, Miura H, et al. 2007. Can magnetic resonance imaging-derived bone models be used for accurate motion measurement with single-plane three-dimensional shape registration? J Ortho Res 25:867-872.
17. Anderson D, Iyer K, Segal N, et al. 2009. Implementation of discrete element analysis for subject-specific, population-wide investigations of habitual contact stress exposure. J Appl Biomech (in press).
18. Barker MK, Seedhom BB. 2001. The relationship of the compressivemodulus of articular cartilage with its deformation response to cyclic loading: does cartilage optimize its modulus so as to minimize the strains arising in it due to the prevalent loading regime? Rheumatology (Oxford) 40:274-284.
19. Jin H, Lewis JL. 2004. Determination of Poisson's ratio of articular cartilage by indentation using different-sized indenters. J Biomech Eng 126:138-145. (Pubitemid 38621126)
20. Brouwer GM, van Tol AW, Bergink AP, et al. 2007. Association between valgus and varus alignment and the development and progression of radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee. Arth Rheum 56:1204-1211. (Pubitemid 46608645)
21. Hunter DJ, Lavalley M, Li J, et al. 2007. Urinary pentosidine does not predict cartilage loss among subjects with symptomatic knee OA: the BOKS Study. Osteoarth Cart/OARS, Osteoarth Res Soc 15:93-97. (Pubitemid 46117913)
22. Hunter DJ, Niu J, Felson DT, et al. 2007. Knee alignment does not predict incident osteoarthritis: the Framingham osteoarthritis study. Arth Rheum 56:1212-1218. (Pubitemid 46608646)
23. Baliunas AJ, Hurwitz DE, Ryals AB, et al. 2002. Increased knee joint loads during walking are present in subjects with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarth Cart/OARS, Osteoarth Res Soc 10:573-579.
24. Beillas P, Lee SW, Tashman S, et al. 2007. Sensitivity of the tibio-femoral response to finite element modeling parameters. Comput Meth Biomech Biomed Eng 10:209-221.
25. Jafari A, Farahmand F, Meghdari A. 2008. The effects of trochlear groove geometry on patellofemoral joint stability - a computer model study. Proc Instit Mech Eng 222:75-88. (Pubitemid 351593646)
26. Wilson W, van Donkelaar CC, van Rietbergen R, et al. 2005. The role of computational models in the search for the mechanical behavior and damage mechanisms of articular cartilage. Med Eng Phys 27:810-826. (Pubitemid 41613749)
27. Elias JJ, Wilson DR, Adamson R, et al. 2004. Evaluation of a computational model used to predict the patellofemoral contact pressure distribution. J Biomech 37:295-302. (Pubitemid 38156077)
28. Elias JJ, Cosgarea AJ. 2007. Computational modeling: an alternative approach for investigating patellofemoral mechanics. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 15:89-94.
29. Dargahi J, Najarian S, Amiri S. 2003. Optimization of the geometry of total knee implant in the sagittal plane using FEA. Biomed Mat Eng 13:439-449. (Pubitemid 37548171)
30. Volokh KY, Chao EY, Armand M. 2007. On foundations of discrete element analysis of contact in diarthrodial joints. Mol Cell Biomech 4:67-73.
31. Lin YC, Farr J, Carter K, et al. 2006. Response surface optimization for joint contact model evaluation. J Appl Biomech 22:120-130.
32. Cicuttini FM, Baker J, Hart DJ, et al. 1996. Association of pain with radiological changes in different compartments and views of the knee joint. Osteoarth Cart/OARS, Osteoarth Res Soc 4:143-147. (Pubitemid 26226438)
33. Bruyere O, Honore A, Rovati LC, et al. 2002. Radiologic features poorly predict clinical outcomes in knee osteoarthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 31:13-16. (Pubitemid 34169444)
34. Buckwalter JA, Saltzman C, Brown T. 2004. The impact of osteoarthritis: implications for research. Clin Orthop Relat Res 427:S6-S15.
35. Pena E, Calvo B, Martinez MA, et al. 2006. Why lateral meniscectomy is more dangerous than medial meniscectomy. A finite element study. J Ortho Res 24:1001-1010. (Pubitemid 43804935)