Interaction as an interestingness measure

Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, ICDM

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 726-731

  McGrane, Martin ^a   Poon, Simon K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Interactions; Interestingness; Patterns

Indexed keywords

DATA SETS; DIVERSE DOMAINS; INTERACTION PATTERN; INTERACTION RULES; INTERACTIONS; INTERESTINGNESS; INTERESTINGNESS MEASURES; KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY; PATTERNS; STATISTICAL VALIDATION;

DATA MINING;

ASSOCIATION RULES;

EID: 79951764942     PISSN: 15504786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICDMW.2010.126     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Moore, J. H., Gilbert, J. C., Tsai, C.-T., Chiang, F.-T., Holden, T., Barney, N. and White, B. C. A flexible computational framework for detecting, characterizing, and interpreting statistical patterns of epistasis in genetic studies of human disease susceptibility. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 241, 2 (2006), 252-261. (Pubitemid 43993963)
2. Topkis, D. M. Minimizing a Submodular Function on a Lattice. Operations Research, 26, 2 (March 1 1978), 305-321.
3. MacCormack, A., Rusnak, J. and Baldwin, C. Y. Exploring the Structure of Complex Software Designs: An Empirical Study of Open Source and Proprietary Code. Management Science, 52, 7 (July 1 2006), 1015-1030. (Pubitemid 43990589)
4. Rivkin, J. W. and Siggelkow, N. Patterned Interactions in Complex Systems: Implications for Exploration. Manage. Sci., 53, 7 (2007), 1068-1085. (Pubitemid 351159613)
5. Tan, P.-N., Kumar, V. and Srivastava, J. Selecting the right objective measure for association analysis. Information Systems, 29, 4 (2004), 293 - 313.
6. Geng, L. and Hamilton, H. J. Interestingness measures for data mining: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv., 38, 3 (2006), 9.
7. Berry, G. and Liddell, F. D. K. The Interaction of Asbestos and Smoking in Lung Cancer: A Modified Measure of Effect. Ann Occup Hyg, 48, 5 (2004), 459-462. (Pubitemid 38993754)
8. Baron, R. and Kenny, D. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51, 6 (1986), 1173-1182.
9. Rothman, K., Greenland, S. and Last, T. Modern Epidemiology. PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2008.
10. Agrawal, R., Imielinski, T. and Swami, A. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. SIGMOD Rec., 22, 2 (1993), 207-216.
11. Brijs, T., Swinnen, G., Vanhoof, K. and Wets, G. Building an Association Rules Framework to Improve Product Assortment Decisions. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 8, 1 (2004), 7-23. (Pubitemid 39019969)
12. Verhein, F. Using Significant, Positively Associated and Relatively Class Correlated Rules for Associative Classification of Imbalanced Datasets. City, 2007.
13. Hahn, L. W., Ritchie, M. D. and Moore, J. H. Multifactor dimensionality reduction software for detecting gene-gene and geneenvironment interactions. Bioinformatics, 19, 3 (February 12 2003), 376-382. (Pubitemid 36284937)
14. Jakulin, A. and Bratko, I. Analyzing Attribute Dependencies. City, 2003.
15. Rothman, K. J. The Estimation of Synergy or Antagonism. Am. J. Epidemiol., 103, 5 (May 1, 1976 1976), 506-511.
16. Hogan, M. D., Kupper, L. L., Most, B. M. and Haseman, J. K. Alternatives To Rothman's Approach For Assessing Synergism (Or Antagonism) In Cohort Studies. Am. J. Epidemiol., 108, 1 (July 1 1978), 60-67. (Pubitemid 9000924)
17. Bulow, J. I., Geanakoplos, J. D. and Klemperer, P. D. Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and Complements. Journal of Political Economy, 93, 3 (1985), 488-511.
18. Kalilani, L. and Atashili, J. Measuring additive interaction using odds ratios. Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations, 3, 1 (2006), 5.
19. Gregor, S., Fernandez, W., Holtham, D., Martin, M., Stern, S., Vitale, M. and Pratt, G. Achieving Value from ICT: Key Management Strategies. Department of Communications, IT and the Arts, ICT Research Study, Canberra., 2004.
20. Zhou, X., Chen, S., Liu, B., Zhang, R., Wang, Y., Li, P., Guo, Y., Zhang, H., Gao, Z. and Yan, X. Development of traditional Chinese medicine clinical data warehouse for medical knowledge discovery and decision support. Artif. Intell. Med., 48, 2-3 (2010), 139-152.
21. Zhou, X., Poon, J., Kwan, P., Zhang, R., Wang, Y., Poon, S., Liu, B. and Sze, D. Novel Two-Stage Analytic Approach in Extraction of Strong Herb-Herb Interactions in TCM Clinical Treatment of Insomnia. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Biometrics (2010).
22. Poon, S., Poon, J., Peters, G., Gupta, N. and Lesley, L. Complementary organizational mechanisms - A case study on information technology business value. Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Information Systems, in press (2010).
23. Freitas, A. Understanding the Crucial Role of Attribute Interaction in Data Mining. Artificial Intelligence Review, 16, 3 (2001), 177-199. (Pubitemid 32991761)
24. Dooley, K. J. and Ven, A. H. V. d. Explaining Complex Organizational Dynamics. Organization Science, 10, 3 (1999), 358- 372.
25. Chan, K. and Lee, H. The way forward for Chinese medicine. Taylor and Francis, London, 2002.
26. Richardson, D. B. and Kaufman, J. S. Estimation of the Relative Excess Risk Due to Interaction and Associated Confidence Bounds. Am. J. Epidemiol. (February 11 2009).
27. Foraita, R. A conditional synergy index to assess biological interaction. European Journal of Epidemiology, 24, 9 (2009), 485- 494.
28. Darroch, J. N. and Borkent, M. Synergism, attributable risk and interaction for two binary exposure factors. Biometrika, 81, 2 (June 1 1994), 259-270.