Mechanistic approach of the difference in non-enzymatic hydrolysis rate between the L and D enantiomers of no-carrier added 2-[18F] fluoromethyl-phenylalanine

Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 80-85

  Kersemans, Ken ^a   Mertens, John ^a   De Proft, Frank ^a   Geerlings, Paul ^a  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

different; hydrolysis; non enzymatic; rates

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; ATOMS; ENANTIOMERS; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; HYDROGEN; STEREOCHEMISTRY; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

BENZYLIC; CALCIUM IONS; DEFLUORINATION; DIFFERENT; HYDROLYSIS RATE; L-PHENYLALANINE; MECHANISTICS; NON-ENZYMATIC; PHENETHYLAMINES; RATE;

FLUORINE;

AMINO ACID; FLUORINE 18; FLUOROMETHYLPHENYLALANINE F 18; PHENYLALANINE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; ENANTIOMER; FLUORINATION; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; HYDROLYSIS; ISOTOPE LABELING; RADIOCHEMISTRY; SHELF LIFE; SYNTHESIS;

EID: 79951752555     PISSN: 03624803     EISSN: 10991344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jlcr.1811     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. K. Kersemans, M. Bauwens, T. Lahoutte, A. Bossuyt, J. Mertens, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 2007, 571, 151.
2. K. Kersemans, M. Bauwens, J. Mertens, Nucl. Med. Biol. 2008, 35, 425.
3. K. Kersemans, J. Mertens, V. Caveliers, J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2009. Published Online: Nov 30.
4. A. E. Reed, R. B. Weinstock, F. Weinhold, J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 83, 735.
5. A. E. Reed, F. Weinhold, J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 83, 1736.
6. A. E. Reed, L. A. Curtiss, F. Weinhold, Chem. Rev. 1988, 88, 899.
7. A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648.
8. C. T. Lee, W. T. Yang, R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785.
9. For a detailed account on these types of basis sets, see, e.g., W. J. Hehre, L. Radom, P. v. R. Schleyer, J. A. Pople, Ab Initio Molecular Orbital Theory, Wiley, New York, 1986.
10. J. A. Pople, et al,. Gaussian 03. Revision B.03, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2004.
11. K. Leftheris, G. Ahmed, R. Chan, A. J. Dyckman, Z. Hussain, K. Ho, J. Hynes, Jr, J. Letourneau, W. Li, S. Lin, A. Metzger, K. J. Moriarty, C. Riviello, Y. Shimshock, J. Wen, J. Wityak, S. T. Wrobleski, H. Wu, J. Wu, M. Desai, K. M. Gillooly, T. H. Lin, D. Loo, K. W. McIntyre, S. Pitt, D. Ren Shen, D. J. Shuster, R. Zhang, D. Diller, A. Doweyko, J. Sack, J. Baldwin, J. Barrish, J. Dodd, I. Henderson, S. Kanner, G. L. Schieven, and, M. Webb, J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 6283.
12. P. Li, K. Zhao, S. Deng, D. W. Landry, Helv. Chim. Acta. 1999, 82, 85.
13. C. G. Zhan, S. X. Deng, J. G. Skiba, B. A. Hayes, S. M. Tschampel, G. C. Shields, D. W. Landry, J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 980.
14. E. L. Eliel, S. H. Wilen, L. N. Mander, Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds, Wiley, New York, 1994.
15. V. Gutman, The Donor-Acceptor approach to molecular interactions, Plenum Press, New York, 1978, Chapter 3.
16. P. W. Ayers, J. S. M. Anderson, J. L. Rodriguez, Z. Jawed, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 1918.
17. L. Broeckaert, J. Moens, G. Roos, F. De Proft, P. Geerlings, J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 12164.
18. G. Boon, C. Van Alsenoy, F. De Proft, P. Bultinck, P. Geerlings, J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 107, 11120.
19. G. Boon, C. Van Alsenoy, F. De Proft, P. Bultinck, P. Geerlings, J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 2005, 729, 49.
20. As this program software does not allow to introduce hydrogen bridge interactions the second chiral carbon atom had to be introduced artificially by replacing the H atom by a deuterium atom.
21. M. Bauwens, M. Keyaerts, T. Lahoutte, K. Kersemans, V. Caveliers, A. Bossuyt, J. Mertens, Nucl. Med. Commun. 2007, 28, 823.