Comparison of SNPs and microsatellites for fine-scale application of genetic stock identification of Chinook salmon in the Columbia River Basin

Molecular Ecology Resources

Volumn 11, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages 137-149

  Hess, J E ^a   Matala, A P ^a   Narum, S R ^a  

^a Hagerman Fish Culture Experiment Station ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

SATs; Chinook salmon; Fisheries management; Oncorhynchus tshawytscha; SNPs

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; RIVER; SALMON; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOTYPE; IDAHO; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; OREGON; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; RIVERS; SALMON; WASHINGTON;

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 79951745279     PISSN: 1755098X     EISSN: 17550998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02958.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ackerman MW, Habicht C, Seeb LW (in press) SNPs under diversifying selection provide increased accuracy and precision in mixed stock analysis of sockeye salmon from Copper River, Alaska and nearby coastal areas. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society.
2. Anderson EC (2010) Assessing the power of informative subsets of loci for population assignment: standard methods are upwardly biased. Molecular Ecology Resources, 10, 701-710.
3. Anderson EC, Waples RS, Kalinowski ST (2008) An improved method for estimating the accuracy of genetic stock identification. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 65, 1475-1486.
4. ST-outlier method. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 323.
5. Beacham TD, Candy JR, Jonsen KL et al. (2006) Estimation of stock composition and individual identification of Chinook salmon across the Pacific Rim by use of microsatellite variation. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 135, 861-888.
6. Beacham TD, McIntosh B, Wallace C (2010) A comparison of stock and individual identification for sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) in British Columbia provided by microsatellites and single nucleotide polymorphisms. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 67, 1274-1290.
7. Bromaghin JF (2008) BELS: backward elimination locus selection for studies of mixture composition or individual assignment. Molecular Ecology Resources, 8, 568-571.
8. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AWF (1967) Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Evolution, 21, 550-570.
9. Crawford NG (2010) SMOGD: software for the measurement of genetic diversity. Molecular Ecology Resources, 10, 556-557.
10. Felsenstein J (1989) PHYLIP - Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3.2). Cladistics, 5, 164-166.
11. Good TP, Waples RS, Adams P, editors. (2005) Updated status of federally listed ESUs of West Coast salmon and steelhead. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-66.
12. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (vers. 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity., 86, 485-486.
13. Hedrick PW (2005) A standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution, 59, 1633-1638.
14. Hess JE, Narum SR (in press) SNP loci correlated with run-timing in adult Chinook salmon from the Columbia River Basin. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society.
15. Jepson MA, Keefer ML, Naughton GP, Peery CA, Burke BJ (2010) Population composition, migration timing, and harvest of Columbia River Chinook Salmon in late summer and fall. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 30, 72-88.
16. Keefer ML, Peery CA, Jepson MA, Tolotti KR, Bjornn TC, Stuehrenberg LC (2004) Stock-specific migration timing of adult spring-summer Chinook salmon in the Columbia River Basin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 24, 1145-1162.
17. Liu N, Chen L, Wang S, Oh C, Zhao H (2005) Comparison of single nucleotide polymorphisms and μSATs in inference of population structure. BMC Genetics, 6(Suppl 1), S26.
18. Matala AP, Hess JE, Narum SR (in press) Resolving adaptive and demographic divergence among Chinook salmon populations in the Columbia River Basin. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society.
19. Millar RB (1987) Maximum likelihood estimation of mixed stock fishery composition. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 44, 583-590.
20. Narum SR, Banks M, Beacham TD et al. (2008) Differentiating salmon populations at broad and fine geographical scales with μSATs and single nucleotide polymorphisms. Molecular Ecology, 17, 3464-3477.
21. Narum SR, Hess JE, Matala AP (2010) Examining genetic lineages of Chinook salmon in the Columbia River Basin. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 139, 1465-1477.
22. Northwest Power and Conservation Council. (2005) Economic effects from Columbia River Basin anadromous salmonid fish production. Independent Economic Analysis Board. Document IEAB 2005-1. .
23. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes, 6, 288-295.
24. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248-249.
25. Ritchie ME, Forrest MS, Dimas AS et al. (2010) Data analysis issues for allele-specific expression using Illumina's GoldenGate assay. BMC Bioinformatics, 11, 280.
26. Santure AW, Stapley J, Ball AD, Birkhead TR, Burke T, Slate J (2010) On the use of large marker panels to estimate inbreeding and relatedness: empirical and simulation studies of a pedigreed zebra finch population typed at 771 SNPs. Molecular Ecology, 19, 1439-1451.
27. Schopen GCB, Bovenhuis H, Visker MHPW, van Arendonk JAM (2008) Comparison of information content for microsatellites and SNPs in poultry and cattle. Animal Genetics, 39, 451-453.
28. Seeb LW, Antonovich A, Banks MA et al. (2007) Development of a standardized DNA database for Chinook salmon. Fisheries, 32, 540-552.
29. Shaklee JB, Beacham TD, Seeb L, White BA (1999) Managing fisheries using genetic data: case studies form four species of Pacific salmon. Fisheries Research, 43, 45-78.
30. Smith CT, Seeb LW (2008) Number of alleles as a predictor of the relative assignment accuracy of short tandem repeat (STR) and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) baselines for Chum salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 137, 751-762.
31. Smith CT, Templin WD, Seeb JE, Seeb LW (2005) Single nucleotide polymorphisms provide accurate estimates of the proportions of U.S. and Candadian Chinook salmon caught in Yukon River fisheries. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 25, 944-953.
32. Waples RS (2010) High-grading bias: subtle problems with assessing power of selected subsets of loci for population assignment. Molecular Ecology, 19, 2599-2601.
33. Waples RS, Teel DJ, Meyers JM, Marshall AR (2004) Life-history divergence in Chinook salmon: historic contingency and parallel evolution. Evolution, 58, 386-403.