A stratified study of students’ understanding of basic optics concepts in different contexts using two‐tier multiple‐choice items

Research in Science and Technological Education

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 253-265

  Chu, Hye Eun ^a   Treagust, David F ^b   Chandrasegaran, A L ^b  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Context dependent; Diagnostic tests; Optics concepts; Secondary science

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951743060     PISSN: 02635143     EISSN: 14701138     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02635140903162553     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Andersson, B., and Karrqvist, C., 1983. How Swedish pupils ages 12–15 years understand light and its properties. European Journal of Science Education, 5: 387–402.
2. Bengall, S., Goldberg, F., and Galili, I., 1993. Prospective elementary teachers’ prior knowledge about light. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30: 1169–87.
3. Chu, H.‐E., Treagust, D., and Chandrasegaran, A.L., 2008. Naïve students’ conceptual development and beliefs: The need for multiple analyses to determine what contributes to student success in a university introduction physics course. Research in Science Education, 38: 111–25.
4. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., and Scott, P., 1994. Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23 (7): 5–12.
5. Duit, R., and Treagust, D.F., 1995. “ students’ conceptions and constructivist teaching approaches ”. In Improving Science Education, Edited by: Fraser, B.J., and Walberg, H.J., 46–9. Chicago, IL: The National Society for the Study of Education.
6. Fetherstonhaugh, T., and Treagust, D.F., 1992. students’ understanding of light and its properties: Teaching to engender conceptual change. Science Education, 76 (6): 653–72.
7. Galili, I., and Hazon, A., 2000. Learners’ knowledge in optics: Interpretation, structure, and analysis. International Journal of Science Teaching, 22 (1): 57–88.
8. Hammer, D., 1994. students’ beliefs about conceptual knowledge in introductory physics. International Journal of Science Education, 16 (4): 385–403.
9. Heywood, D.S., 2005. Primary trainee teachers’ learning and teaching about light: Some pedagogic implications for initial teacher training. International Journal of Science Teaching, 27 (12): 1447–75.
10. La Rosa, C., Mayer, M., Patrizi, P., and Vicentini‐Missoni, M., 1984. Commonsense knowledge in optics: Preliminary results of an investigation into the properties of light. European Journal of Science Education, 6 (4): 387–97.
11. Langley, D., Ronen, M., and Eylon, B.S., 1997. Light propagation and visual patterns: Preinstruction learners’ conceptions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34 (4): 399–424.
12. Pintrich, P.R., Marx, R.W., and Boyle, R.A., 1993. Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63 (2): 167–99.
13. Rust, J., and Golombok, S., 1999. Modern psychometrics: The science of psychological assessment, New York, NY: Routledge.
14. Shapiro, B.L., 1989. What children bring to light: Giving high status to learners’ views and actions in science. Science Education, 73 (6): 711–33.
15. Toh, K.A., Boo, H.K., and Woon, T.L., 1999. students’ perspectives in understanding light and vision. Educational Research, 41 (2): 155–62.
16. Treagust, D.F., 1995. “ Diagnostic assessment of students’ science knowledge ”. In Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice, Edited by: Glynn, S. M., and Duit, R., Vol. 1, 327–46. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Treagust, D.F., and Chandrasegaran, A.L., 2007. The Taiwan National Science Learning Study in an international perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 29 (4): 391–403.
18. Tytler, R., 2002. Teaching for understanding: Constructivist/conceptual change teaching approaches. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 48 (4): 30–5.