Accidental versus operational oil spills from shipping in the baltic sea: Risk governance and management strategies

Ambio

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 170-178

  Hassler, Björn ^a  

^a School of Life Sciences Södertörn University   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Baltic Sea; Environmental hazard; Marine governance; Oil spill; Oil transportation; Risk

Indexed keywords

PETROLEUM;

ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INCENTIVE; OIL SPILL; POLLUTION MONITORING; SHIPPING;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BALTIC STATES; CHEMICAL ACCIDENT; HUMAN; RISK MANAGEMENT; SEA; WATER POLLUTION;

ANIMALS; BALTIC STATES; CHEMICAL HAZARD RELEASE; HUMANS; OCEANS AND SEAS; PETROLEUM; RISK MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTION, CHEMICAL;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; BALTIC SEA;

EID: 79951736928     PISSN: 00447447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-010-0128-y     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bloor, M., R. Datta, Y. Gilinskiy, and T. Horlick-Jones. 2004. Unicorn among the Cedars: On the possibility of effective ''smart regulation'' of the globalized shipping industry. Social & Legal Studies 15(4): 534-551. (Pubitemid 44705952)
2. DeSombre, E.R. 2006. Flagging Standards: Globalization and Environmental, Safety and Labor Regulations at Sea. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Hassler, B. 2006. Miljösamarbete i Östersjöregionen. In FORMAS fokuserar-Östersjön, ed. Birgitta Johansson. Stockholm: Formas.
4. Hassler, B. 2008. Individual incentives, collective action, and institutional cooperation-Sweden and the case of Baltic Sea oil transports. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 10(4): 339-358.
5. Hassler, B. 2010. Global regimes, regional adaptation; environmental safety in Baltic Sea oil transportation. Maritime Policy and Management 37(5): 489-505.
6. HELCOM. 2008. Report on shipping accidents in the Baltic Sea area for the year 2008. Helsinki: The Helsinki Commission.
7. HELCOM. 2009. Annual 2008 HELCOM report on illegal discharges observed during aerial surveillance. Helsinki: The Helsinki Commission.
8. HELCOM. 2010. Annual 2009 HELCOM report on illegal discharges observed during aerial surveillance. Helsinki: the Helsinki Commission.
9. Helm, K., and D.F. Sprinz. 2000. Measuring the effectiveness of international environmental regimes. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44(5): 630-652.
10. Hovi, J., D.F. Sprinz, and A. Underdal. 2003. The Oslo-Potsdam solution to measuring regime effectiveness: Critique, response, and the road ahead. Global Environment Politics (August):3.
11. IMO. 2003. Port State Control-An Update of IMO's Work in 2003. London: International Maritime Organization.
12. IMO. 2010. Port State Control. London: International Maritime Organization. http://www.imo.org/Facilitation/mainframe.asp?topic-id=159. Accessed 2010-07-01.
13. International Chamber of Shipping. 2006. Shipping Industry Guidelines on Flag State Performance, 2nd ed. London: Maritime International Secretariat Services Limited.
14. Keohane, R.O. 1984. After Hegemony-Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
15. Knapp, S., and P.H. Franses. 2007. A global view on port state control-Econometric analysis of the differences across port state control regimes. Maritime Policy and Management 34(5): 453-483.
16. Knudsen, O.F., and B. Hassler. 2011. IMO legislation and its implementation: Accident risk, vessel deficiencies and national administrative. Marine Policy 35: 201-207.
17. Miles, E.L., A. Underdal, S. Andresen, J. Wettestad, J.B. Skjaerseth, and E.M. Carlin. 2001. Explaining Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Mitchell, R.B. 1994. Intentional Oil Pollution at Sea: Environmental Policy and Treaty Compliance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Mitchell, R.B. 2006. Problem Structure, Institutional Design, and the Relative Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements. Global Environmental Politics 6(3): 72-89. (Pubitemid 44411349)
20. National Research Council. 2002. Oil in the Sea III: Inputs, Fates and Effects. Washington: The National Academic Press.
21. Obando-Rojas, B., I. Welsh, M. Bloor, A.D. Lane, V. Badigannavar, and M. Maguire. 2004. The political economy of fraud in a globalised industry: The case of seafarers' certifications. Sociological Review 52: 295-313.
22. Oberthür, S., and T. Gehring (eds.). 2006a. Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict Among International and EU Policies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Oberthür, S., and T. Gehring (eds.). 2006b. Conceptual Foundations of Institutional Interaction. In Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies, ed. S. Oberthür, and G. Thomas, 19-51. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Stokke, O.S. 2001. The Interplay of International Regimes: Putting Effectiveness Theory to Work. FNI Report 14/2001. Lysaker: Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
25. Uggla, Y. 2007. Environmental protection and the freedom of the high seas: The Baltic Sea as a PSSA from a Swedish perspective. Marine Policy 31: 251-257. (Pubitemid 46140582)
26. Underdal, A. 2002. One Question, Two Answers. In Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence, ed. E. L. Miles, S. Andrésen, J. Wettestad, J. B. Skjærseth, and E. M. Carlin, 3-45. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Underdal, A., and O.R. Young (eds.). 2004. Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
28. Victor, D.G. 2006. Toward effective international cooperation on climate change: Numbers, interests and institutions. Global Environmental Politics 6(3): 90-103. (Pubitemid 44411350)
29. Young, O.R. (ed.). 1999. The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and Behavioral Mechanisms. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.