Interdisciplinarity in the environmental sciences: Barriers and frontiers

Environmental Conservation

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 464-477

  Hicks, Christina C ^a,b   Fitzsimmons, Clare ^a   Polunin, Nicholas V C ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

environmental sciences; interdisciplinarity; science metrics; science policy; social network analysis

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE; INTERDISCIPLINARITY; SCIENCE METRICS; SCIENCE POLICY; SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS;

ECOLOGY; INDEXING (OF INFORMATION); RESEARCH;

ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS;

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GLOBAL CHANGE; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; NETWORK ANALYSIS; SOCIAL NETWORK;

EID: 79951736131     PISSN: 03768929     EISSN: 14694387     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0376892910000822     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Amaral, L.A.N. & Uzzi, B. (2007) Complex systems. A new paradigm for the integrative study of management, physical, and technological systems. Management Science 53(7): 1033-1035. (Pubitemid 351159610)
2. Balsiger, P.W. (2004) Supradisciplinary research practices: history, objectives and rationale. Futures 36(4): 407-421. (Pubitemid 38381766)
3. Barry, A., Born, G. & Weszkalnys, G. (2008) Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economy and Society 37: 20-49.
4. Bascompte, J., Jordano, P. & Olesen, J.M. (2006) Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science 312(5772): 431-433.
5. Bordons, M., Morillo, F. & Gomez, I. (2004) Analysis of cross-disciplinary research through bibliometric tools. In: Handbook of Quantiative Science and Technology Research: the Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems, pp. 437-456. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
6. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G. & Freeman, L.C. (2002) UCINET 6 For Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis [www document]. URL http://www.citeulike.org/user/eldaly/article/1030331 http://www.analytictech. com/
7. Bornmann, L., Wallon, G. & Ledin, A. (2008) Does the committee peer review select the best applicants for funding? An investigation of the selection process for two European molecular biology organization programmes. PLoS ONE 3(10): e3480.
8. Bourdieu, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press.
9. Boyack, K., Klavans, R. & Börner, K. (2005) Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics 64(3): 351-374. (Pubitemid 41152144)
10. Bruce, A., Lyall, C., Tait, J. & Williams, R. (2004) Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: the case of the Fifth Framework programme. Futures 36(4): 457-470. (Pubitemid 38381769)
11. Campbell, L.M. (2005) Overcoming obstacles to interdisciplinary research. Conservation Biology 19(2): 574-577. (Pubitemid 40452159)
12. Chapron, G. & Husté, A. L. (2009) Open, fair, and free journal ranking for researchers. Bioscience 56(7): 558-559. (Pubitemid 44051421)
13. Choi, B.C.K. & Pak, A.W.P. (2007) Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 2. Promotors, barriers, and strategies of enhancement. Clinical and Investigative Medicine 30: E224-E232.
14. Clarke, K. & Warwick, R. (2001) Changes in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. Second edition. Plymouth, UK: Plymouth Marine Lab and PRIMER-E.
15. Daily, G.C. & Ehrlich, P.R. (1999) Managing earth's ecosystems: An interdisciplinary challenge. Ecosystems 2(4): 277-280. (Pubitemid 29411908)
16. Dalgaard, T., Hutchings, N.J. & Porter, J.R. (2003) Agroecology, scaling and interdisciplinarity. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 100(1): 39-51. (Pubitemid 37446866)
17. Dogan, M. & Pahre, R. (1990) Scholarly reputation and obsolescence in the social sciences: innovation as a team sport. International Social Science Journal 42(3): 417-427.
18. Drews, J. (2000) Drug discovery: a historical perspective. Science 287(5460): 1960-1964. (Pubitemid 30158662)
19. Egghe, L. & Leydesdorff, L. (2009) The relation between Pearson's correlation coefficient r and Salton's cosine measure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60: 1027-1036.
20. Freeman, L. (1972) Segregation in social networks. Sociological Methods and Research 6: 411-430.
21. Freeman, L. (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40(1): 35-41.
22. Freeman, L. (1979) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks 1(3): 215-239.
23. Garfield, E. (2004) Historiographic mapping of knowledge domains literature. Journal of Information Science 30(2): 119-145.
24. Heberlein, T. (1988) Improving interdisciplinary research: integrating the social and natural sciences. Society and Natural Resources 1(1): 5-16.
25. HESA (2006) Joint Academic Coding System (JACS) Version 2. Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS) and the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) [www document]. URL http://www.hesa.ac.uk/index.php?option=com- studrec&task=show-file&Itemid=233&mnl=07051&href=jacs2.html
26. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Core Writing Team, ed. R.K. Pachauri & A. Reisinger. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
27. Jackson, R.B., Randerson, J.T., Canadell, J.G., Anderson, R.G., Avissar, R., Baldocchi, D.D., Bonan, G.B., Caldeira, K., Diffenbaugh, N.S., Field, C.B., Hungate, B.A., Jobbagy, E.G., Kueppers, L.M., Nosetto, M.D. & Pataki, D.E. (2008) Protecting climate with forests. Environmental Research Letters 3(4): 5.
28. Jakobsen, C.H., Hels, T. & McLaughlin, W.J. (2004) Barriers and facilitators to integration among scientists in transdisciplinary landscape analyses: a cross-country comparison. Forest Policy and Economics 6(1): 15-31. (Pubitemid 38157565)
29. Karlqvist, A. (1999) Going beyond disciplines. The meanings of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sciences 32(4): 379-383.
30. Klein, J. (1990) Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. Detroit, MI, USA: Wayne State University Press.
31. Klein, J.T. (2008) Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. A literature review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35(2): S116-S123. (Pubitemid 351932073)
32. Klein, K.K., Smith, E.G. & Zentner, R.P. (1998) Interdisciplinary agricultural research in Canada. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie 46(3): 259-272.
33. Kueffer, C., Hadorn, G. H., Bammer, G., van Kerkhoff, L. & Pohl, C. (2007) Towards a publication culture in transdisciplinary research. Gaia. Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 16(1): 22-26.
34. Lele, S. & Norgaard, R.B. (2005) Practicing interdisciplinarity. Bioscience 55(11): 967-975. (Pubitemid 41580052)
35. Levitt, J.M. & Thelwall, M. (2008) Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? A macrolevel study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(12): 1973-1984.
36. Leydesdorff, L. (2007a) Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(9): 1303-1319. (Pubitemid 47153973)
37. Leydesdorff, L. (2007b) Mapping interdisciplinarity at the interfaces between the science citation index and the social science citation index. Scientometrics 71(3): 391-405.
38. Leydesdorff, L. (2008) Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59: 278-287. (Pubitemid 351205033)
39. Leydesdorff, L. & Rafols, I. (2009) A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(2): 348-362.
40. Leydesdorff, L., de Moya-Anegón, F. & Guerrero-Bote, V.P. (2010) Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data: a comparison with the journal citation reports of the ISI. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(2):352-369.
41. Lowe, P. & Phillipson, J. (2006) Reflexive interdisciplinary research: the making of a research programme on the rural economy and land use. Journal of Agricultural Economics 57(2): 165-184. (Pubitemid 43905757)
42. Lowe, P. & Phillipson, J. (2009) Barriers to research collaboration across disciplines: scientific paradigms and institutional practices. Environment and Planning A 41(5): 1171-1184.
43. Lowe, P., Whitman, G. & Phillipson, J. (2009) Ecology and the social sciences. Journal of Applied Ecology 46(2): 297-305.
44. MacMynowski, D.P. (2007) Pausing at the brink of interdisciplinarity: power and knowledge at the meeting of social and biophysical science. Ecology and Society 12(1): 20 [www document]. URL http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/ vol12/iss1/art20/
45. Mansilla, V.B. (2006) Assessing expert interdisciplinary work at the frontier: an empirical exploration. Research Evaluation 15(1): 17-29. (Pubitemid 44544939)
46. Mansilla, V.B., Feller, I. & Gardner, H. (2006) Quality assessment in interdisciplinary research and education. Research Evaluation 15(1): 69-74. (Pubitemid 44544943)
47. Max-Neef, M.A. (2005) Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics 53(1): 5-16. (Pubitemid 40771983)
48. McAleece, N., Lambshead, P., Paterson, G. & Gage, J. (1997) BioDiversity Pro. A program for analysing ecological data. Natural History Museum, London, UK.
49. McWilliam, E., Hearn, G. & Haseman, B. (2008) Transdisciplinarity for creative futures: what barriers and opportunities? Innovations in Education and Teaching International 45(3): 247-253.
50. Meybeck, M. (2003) Global analysis of river systems: from Earth system controls to Anthropocene syndromes. Philosophical TransActions of the Royal Society London Series B - Biological Science 358(1440): 1935-1955. (Pubitemid 38062256)
51. Michon, F. & Tummers, M. (2009) The dynamic interest in topics within the biomedical scientific community. PLoS ONE 4(8): e6544.
52. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, ed. (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis [www document]. URL http://www.millenniumassessment.org/ documents/document.356.aspx.pdf
53. Miller, T.R., Baird, T.D., Littlefield, C.M., Kofinas, G., Chapin, F.S. & Redman, C.L. (2008) Epistemological pluralism: reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecology and Society 13(2): 17.
54. Moed, H.F. (2005) Citation analysis of scientific journals and journal impact measures. Current Science 89(12): 1990-1996. (Pubitemid 43175577)
55. Morillo, F., Bordons, M. & Gomez, I. (2001) An approach to interdisciplinarity bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics 51(1): 203-222.
56. Morillo, F., Bordons, M. & Gomez, I. (2003) Interdisciplinarity in science: a tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54(13): 1237-1249.
57. Moya-Anegon, F., Vargas-Quesada, B., Herrero-Solana, V., Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z., Corera-Alvarez, E. & Munoz-Fernandez, F.J. (2004) A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the cocitation of classes and categories. Scientometrics 61(1): 129-145. (Pubitemid 39137575)
58. OECD, ed. (1998) Interdisciplinarity in Science and Technology. Paris, France: OECD, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry.
59. Olden, J.D. (2007) How do ecological journals stack-up? Ranking of scientific quality according to the h index. Ecoscience 14(3): 370-376. (Pubitemid 47559495)
60. Omenn, G.S. (2006) Grand challenges and great opportunities in science, technology, and public policy. Science 314(5806): 1696-1704. (Pubitemid 44969067)
61. Pickett, S.T.A., Burch, W.R. & Grove, J.M. (1999) Interdisciplinary research: maintaining the constructive impulse in a culture of criticism. Ecosystems 2(4): 302-307. (Pubitemid 29411914)
62. Pierce, S. (1999) Boundary crossing in research literatures as a means of interdisciplinary information transfer. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 50(3):271-279.
63. Porter, A.L. & Rafols, I. (2009) Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics 81(3): 719-745.
64. Pudovkin, A.I. & Garfield, E. (2002) Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53: 1113-1119. (Pubitemid 35359180)
65. Quinn, G. & Keough, M. (2002) Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
66. Rafols, I. & Leydesdorff, L. (2009) Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(9): 1823-1835.
67. Rhoten, D. & Parker, A. (2004) Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path. Science 306(5704): 2046-2046.
68. Rinia, E.J., van Leeuwen, T.N., Bruins, E.E.W., van Vuren, H.G. & van Raan, A.F.J. (2002a) Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science. Scientometrics 54(3): 347-362.
69. Rinia, E.J., Van Leeuwen, T.N. & Van Raan, A.F.J. (2002b) Impact measures of interdisciplinary research in physics. Scientometrics 53(2): 241-248.
70. Rinia, E.J., van Leeuwen, T.N., van Vuren, H.G. & van Raan, A.F.J. (1998) Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria. Evaluation of condensed matter physics in the Netherlands. Research Policy 27(1): 95-107. (Pubitemid 128416436)
71. Shinn, T. (1999) Change or mutation? Reflections on the foundations of contemporary science. Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales 38(1): 149-176.
72. Steele, T.W. & Stier, J.C. (2000) The impact of interdisciplinary research in the environmental sciences: a forestry case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51(5): 476-484. (Pubitemid 30589724)
73. Stirling, A. (2007) A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 4(15): 707-719. (Pubitemid 47204169)
74. Strathern, M. (2006) A community of critics? Thoughts on new knowledge. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 12(1): 191-209. (Pubitemid 43362030)
75. Todd, P.A., Guest, J.R., Lu, J. & Ming Chou, L. (2010) One in four citations in marine biology papers are inappropriate. Marine Ecology Progress Series doi: 10.3354/meps08587 (in press).
76. Tress, B., Tress, G. & Fry, G. (2005a) Researchers' experiences, positive and negative, in integrative landscape projects. Environmental Management 36(6): 792-807. (Pubitemid 41667030)
77. Tress, G., Tress, B. & Fry, G. (2005b) Clarifying integrative research concepts in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology 20(4): 479-493. (Pubitemid 41413975)
78. Turner, M.G. & Carpenter, S.R. (1999) Tips and traps in interdisciplinary research. Ecosystems 2(4): 275-276. (Pubitemid 29411907)
79. van Leeuwen, T.N., Moed, H.F., Tijssen, R.J.W., Visser, M.S. & van Raan, A.F.J. (2000) First evidence of serious language-bias in the use of citation analysis for the evaluation of national science systems. Research Evaluation 9(2): 155-156.
80. Walker, R., Moore, N.J., Arima, E., Perz, S., Simmons, C., Caldas, M., Vergara, D. & Bohrer, C. (2009) Protecting the Amazon with protected areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U S A 106(26): 10582-10586.
81. Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
82. Wey, T., Blumstein, D.T., Shen, W. & Jordan, F. (2008) Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality. Animal Behaviour 75: 333-344.