Invariance test of the Multidimensional Body Self-Relations Questionnaire: Do women with breast cancer interpret this measure differently?

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1171-1180

  Sabiston, Catherine M ^a   Rusticus, Shayna ^b   Brunet, Jennifer ^a   McDonough, Meghan H ^c   Hadd, Valerie ^b   Hubley, Anita M ^b   Crocker, Peter R E ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Body image; Clinical oncology; Quality of life; Women's health

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; BREAST TUMOR; CASE CONTROL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; SURVIVOR;

AGED; BODY IMAGE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OVERWEIGHT; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURVIVORS;

EID: 79951722260     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9680-y     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. What is breast cancer? 2009 [cited; Available from: http://www.cancer.ca/ canada-wide/about%20cancer/types%20of%20cancer/what%20is%20breast%20cancer.aspx? sc-lang=en.
2. Baxter, N., Goodwin, P., McLeod, R., et al. (2006). Reliability and validity of the body image after breast cancer questionnaire. Breast Journal, 12, 221-232.
3. Bloom, J. R., Stewart, S. L., Chang, S., et al. (2004). Then and now: Quality of life of young breast cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 13, 147-160. (Pubitemid 38372442)
4. Dalton, E. J., Rasmussen, V. N., Classen, C. C., et al. (2009). Sexual adjustment and body image scale (SABIS): A new measure for breast cancer patients. Breast Journal, 15, 287-290.
5. McDonough, M. H., Sabiston, C. M., & Crocker, P. R. E. (2008). An interpretive phenomenological examination of psychosocial changes among breast cancer survivors in their first season of dragon boating. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 20, 425-440.
6. Cash, T. F., & Pruzinsky, T. (2002). Body images: A handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice. New York: Guilford.
7. Reboussin, B. A., Rejeski, W. J., Martin, K. A., et al. (2000). Correlates of satisfaction with body function and body appearance in middle-and older aged adults: The activity counseling trial (ACT). Psychology & Health, 15, 239-254.
8. Thompson, K., Heinberg, L., Altabe, M., et al. (1999). Exacting beauty: Theory, assessment, method, and treatment of body image disturbance. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
9. Cash, T. F., Winstead, B. A., & Janda, J. H. (1986). Body image survey report: The great American shape-up. Psychology Today, 30-37.
10. Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Journal of Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117-144.
11. Rusticus, S. A., & Hubley, A. M. (2006). Measurement invariance of the Multidimensional Body Self-Relations Questionnaire: Can we compare across age and gender? Sex Roles, 55, 827-842. (Pubitemid 44953031)
12. Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78-90.
13. Cash, T. F. (2000). The Multidimensional Body Self-Relations Questionnaire users' manual. Available from: www.body-images.com.
14. Brunet, J., McDonough, M. H., Hadd, V., et al. (2009). The posttraumatic growth inventory: An examination of the factor structure and invariance among breast cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology. Available online October 27, 2009. doi:10.1002/pon.1640.
15. Hadd, V., Sabiston, C. M., McDonough, M. H., et al. (2010). Assessing sources of stress in breast cancer survivors involved in dragon boat: Determining stressor dimensions and links to types of treatment. Journal of Women's Health (in press).
16. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodnessof-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233-255.
17. Rusticus, S. A., Hubley, A. M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2008). Measurement invariance on the Appearance Schemas Inventory-Revised and the Body Image Quality of Life Inventory across age and gender. Assessment, 15, 60-71.
18. Rock, D. A., Werts, C. E., & Flaugher, R. L. (1978). The use of analysis of covariance structures for comparing the psychometric properties of multiple variables across populations. Behavioral Research, 13, 403-418.
19. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-70.
20. Chan, D. (2000). Detection of differential item functioning on the Kirton Adaptation-Innovation inventory using multiple group mean and covariance structure analyses. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 169-199.
21. Deshon, R. P. (2004). Measures are not invariant across groups with error variance homogeneity. Psychology Science, 46, 137-149.
22. Wu, A. D., Li, Z., & Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Decoding the meaning of factorial invariance and updating the practice of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis: A demonstration with TIMSS data. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 12, 1-26.
23. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (2001). LISREL (Version 8.5). Structural equation modeling [Computer Software]. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
24. Brannick, M. T. (1995). Critical comment on applying covariance structure modeling. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 201-213.
25. Kelloway, K. E. (1995). Structural equation modeling in perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 215-224.
26. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27. Joreskog, K. G., & Moustaki, I. (2006). Factor analysis of ordinal variables: A comparison of three approaches. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 347-387.
28. Moustaki, I. (2003). A general class of latent variable models for ordinal manifest variables with covariate effects on the manifest and latent variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 56, 337-357. (Pubitemid 37434229)
29. Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Joreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409-426.
31. Fobair, P., Stewart, S. L., Chang, S., et al. (2005). Body image and sexual problems in young women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 15, 579-594.
32. Sabiston, C. M., McDonough, M. H., & Crocker, P. R. E. (2007). Psycho-social experiences of breast cancer survivors involved in a dragon boat program: Exploring links to positive psychological growth. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29, 419-438.
33. Ward, A., Kuta, J., & Sanborn, L. (2003). Breast cancer. In L. M. LeMura, S. P. Von Duvillard, et al. (Eds.), Clinical exercise physiology (pp. 405-419). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
34. Cash, T. F., & Pruzinsky, T. (2002). Body image: A handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice. New York: Guilford.
35. White, C. A. (2002). Body images in oncology. In T. F. Cash & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body image: A handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice (pp. 379-386). New York: Gilford.
36. Muennig, P., Jia, H., Lee, R., et al. (2008). I think therefore I am: Perceived ideal weight as a determinant of health. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 501-506. (Pubitemid 351354519)
37. Cash, T. F., Jakatdar, T. A., & Flemming Williams, E. (2004). The Body Image Quality of Life Inventory: Further validation with college men and women. Body Image, 1, 279-287. (Pubitemid 40105803)
38. King, M. T., Kenny, P., Shiell, A., et al. (2001). Quality of life three months and one year after first treatment for early stage breast cancer: Influence of treatment and patient characteristics. Quality of Life, 20, 789-800. (Pubitemid 32209793)
39. Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 1-18. (Pubitemid 38430320)
40. Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1995). Trauma and transformation: Growing in the aftermath of suffering. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Cordova, M. J., Cunningham, L. L., Carlson, C. R., et al. (2001). Posttraumatic growth following breast cancer: A controlled comparison study. Health Psychology, 20, 176-185. (Pubitemid 32507354)
42. Zumbo, B. D., & Hubley, A. M. (1998). A note on misconceptions concerning prospective and retrospective power. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series D: The Statistician, 47, 385-388. (Pubitemid 128459062)
43. Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746-759.