Global sensitivity analysis of a 3-dimensional street canyon model-Part I: The development of high dimensional model representations

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1857-1873

  Ziehn, T ^a   Tomlin, A S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Global sensitivity analysis; High dimensional model representation; Street canyon; Street scale model; Urban flow and dispersion

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL METHODS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; HIGH DIMENSIONAL MODEL REPRESENTATION (HDMR); STREET SCALE MODEL;

GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; FLOW FIELD; MAPPING METHOD; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STREET CANYON; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; HIGH DIMENSIONAL MODEL REPRESENTATION; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; URBAN AREA;

EID: 39149105979     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.11.018     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aliş O.F., and Rabitz H. Efficient implementation of high dimensional model representations. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry 29 (2001) 127-142
2. Baker J., Walker H.L., and Cai X. A study of the dispersion and transport of reactive pollutants in and above street canyons-a large eddy simulation. Atmospheric Environment 38 (2004) 6883-6892
3. Benson, J., Ziehn, T., Dixon, N.S., Tomlin, A.S., 2007. Global sensitivity analysis of a 3D street canyon model-Part II: Application and physical insight using sensitivity analysis. Atmospheric Environment, in press, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.11.021.
4. Berkowicz R. OSPM-a parameterised street pollution model. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 65 (2000) 323-331
5. Boddy J.W.D., Smalley R.J., Goodman P.S., Tate J.E., Bell M.C., and Tomlin A.S. The spatial variability in concentrations of a traffic-related pollutant in two street canyons in York, UK. Part I: The influence of background winds. Atmospheric Environment 39 (2005) 3147-3161
6. Campolongo F., and Braddock R. Sensitivity analysis of the IMAGE Grennhouse model. Environmental Modelling & Software 14 (1999) 275-282
7. Chan K., Tarantola S., Saltelli A., and Sobol I.M. Variance-based methods. In: Saltelli A., Chan K., and Scott E.M. (Eds). Sensitivity Analysis (2000), Wiley, New York
8. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, 2000. The Air Quality Strategy for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, Department of the Environment, Transport and Regions. 〈http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/airquality/strategy〉.
9. Dixon N.S., Boddy J.W.D., Smalley R.J., and Tomlin A.S. Evaluation of a turbulent flow and dispersion model in a typical street canyon in York, UK. Atmospheric Environment 40 (2006) 958-972
10. Eichhorn, J., 1996. Validation of a microscale pollution dispersal model. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Meeting on Air Pollution Modeling and its Application.
11. Helton J.C., and Davis F.J. Illustration of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Risk Analysis 22 (2002) 591-622
12. Isukapalli S.S., Roy A., and Georgopoulos P.G. Efficient sensitivity/uncertainty analysis using the combined stochastic response surface method and automated differentiation: application to environmental and biological systems. Risk Analysis 20 (2000) 591-602
13. Jakeman A.J., Letcher R.A., and Norton J.P. Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental models. Environmental Modelling & Software 21 (2006) 602-614
14. Li G., Rosenthal C., and Rabitz H. High dimensional model representations. Journal of Physical Chemistry A 105 (2001) 7765-7777
15. Li G., Wang S.-W., and Rabitz H. Practical approaches to construct RS-HDMR component functions. Journal of Physical Chemistry A 106 (2002) 8721-8733
16. Li G., Wang S.-W., Rabitz H., Wang S., and Jaffé P. Global uncertainty assessments by high dimensional model representations (HDMR). Chemical Engineering Science 57 (2002) 4445-4460
17. Li G., Wang S.-W., Rabitz H., Wang S.-W., and Georgopoulos P.G. Correlation method for variance reduction of monte carlo integration in RS-HDMR. Journal of Computational Chemistry 24 (2003) 277-283
18. Liu C.-H., and Barth M.C. Large-eddy simulation of flow and scalar transport in a modeled street canyon. Journal of Applied Meteorology 41 (2002) 660-673
19. Louka P., Belcher S.E., and Harrison R.G. Coupling between air flow in streets and the well-developed boundary layer aloft. Atmospheric Environment 34 (2000) 2613-2621
20. 2 deposition flux. Atmospheric Environment 39 (2005) 5025-5039
21. Manomaiphiboon K., and Russell A.G. Effects of uncertainties in parameters of a Lagrangian paricle model on mean ground-level concentrations under stable conditions. Atmospheric Environment 38 (2004) 5529-5543
22. Moin P., and Mahesh K. Direct numerical simulation: a tool in turbulence research. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 30 (1998) 539-578
23. Morris M.D. Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 33 (1991) 161-174
24. Nakamura Y., and Oke T.R. Wind, temperature and stability conditions in an east-west oriented urban canyon. Atmospheric Environment 22 (1988) 2691-2700
25. Rabitz H., Kramer M., and Dacol D. Sensitivity analysis in chemical kinetics. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 34 (1983) 419-461
26. Rabitz H., Aliş O.F., Shorter J., and Shim K. Efficient input-output model representations. Computer Physics Communications 117 (1999) 11-20
27. Saltelli A., Tarantola S., and Chan K.P.-S. A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output. Technometrics 41 (1999) 39-56
28. Saltelli A., Chan K., and Scott A.M. Sensitivity Analysis (2000), Wiley, New York
29. Sobol I.M. On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals. USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 7 (1976) 86-112
30. Sobol I.M. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 55 (2001) 271-280
31. Tomlin, A.S., Turányi, T., Pilling, M.J., 1997. Mathematical tools for the construction, investigation and reduction of combustion mechanisms. In: Pilling, M., Hancock, G. (Eds.), Low Temperature Combustion and Autoignition, pp. 293-437.
32. Turányi T., and Rabitz H. Local methods. In: Saltelli A., Chan K., and Scott E.M. (Eds). Sensitivity Analysis (2000), Wiley, New York
33. Yegnan A., Williamson D.G., and Graettinger A.J. Uncertainty analysis in air dispersion modeling. Environmental Modelling & Software 17 (2002) 639-649