Understanding the underlying structure of deceptive behaviors

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 783-789

  Phillips, Michelle C ^a   Meek, Scott W ^a   Vendemia, Jennifer M C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Deception; Individual Differences; Lies; Personality

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951670175     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.031     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ashton M.C., Lee K., Perugini M., Szarota P., de Vries R.E., Di Blas L., et al. A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2004, 86(2):356-366.
2. Christie R., Geis F. Studies in machiavellianism 1970, Academic Press, New York.
3. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. 2nd ed.
4. DePaulo B.M., Ansfield M.E., Kirkendol S.E., Boden J.M. Serious lies. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2004, 26:147-167.
5. DePaulo B.M., Kashy D.A., Kirkendol S.E., Wyer M.M., Epstein J.A. Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996, 70:979-995.
6. Eswara H.S., Suryarekha A. The relationship between lie scores and anxiety scores on taylor's manifest anxiety scale. Journal of Psychological Researches 1974, 18(3):88-90.
7. Goffman E. Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience 1974, Harper & Row, New York.
8. Goldberg L.R. A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality Psychology in Europe 1999, 7-28. Tilburg University Press, Tilburg, Vol. 7. I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F.D. Fruyt, F. Ostendorf (Eds.).
9. Gozna L., Vrij A., Bull B. The impact of individual differences on perceptions of lying in everyday life and in a high stake situation. Personality and Individual Differences 2001, 31(7):1203-1216.
10. Gudjonsson G.H., Sigurdsson J.F. The relationship of suggestibility and compliance with self-deception and other-deception. Psychology Crime and Law 2004, 19(4):447-453.
11. Kashy D.A., DePaulo B.M. Who lies?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996, 70:1037-1051.
12. Luber B., Fisher C., Appelbaum P.S., Ploesser M., Lisanby S.H. Non-invasive brain stimulation in the detection of deception: Scientific challenges and ethical consequences. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 2009, 27:191-208.
13. McLeod B.A., Genereux R.L. Predicting the acceptability and likelihood of lying: The interaction of personality with type of lie. Personality and Individual Differences 2008, 45:591-596.
14. Nunnally J.C. Psychometric theory 1978, McGraw-Hill, New York. 2nd ed.
15. Pedhauzer E., Schmelkin L. Measurement, design, and analysis: an integrated approach 1991, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
16. Phillips M.C., Vendemia J.M.C. Individual differences in comparison question anxiety. European Polygraph 2008, 2(3-4):5-6.
17. Pope W.R., Forsyth D.R. Judgments of deceptive communications: A multidimensional analysis. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1986, 24(6):435-436.
18. Radloff L.S. The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement 1977, 1:385-401.
19. Saucier G., Goldberg L.R. Evidence for the Big Five in analyses of familiar english personality adjectives. European Journal of Personality 1996, 10(1):61-77.
20. Weaver J. Mapping the links between personality and communicator style. Individual Differences Research 2005, 3(1):59-70.