Analysis of nanofiltration parameters of removal of an anionic detergent

Desalination

Volumn 221, Issue 1-3, 2008, Pages 303-311

  Kertesz Sz ^a   Laszlo Zs ^a   Horvath Zs H ^a   Hodur C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

Author keywords

ANOVA; Bartlett test; Cochran test; Flux; Fouling index; Hartley test; Membrane separation; Nanofiltration; Shapiro Wilk test; Surfactant

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA); ANIONIC SURFACTANTS; CLEANING; DETERGENTS; PRESSURE; REMOVAL; SOLUTIONS; TEMPERATURE; WASTEWATER;

ANIONIC DETERGENT; BARTLETT TEST; COCHRAN TEST; FOULING INDEX; HARTLEY TEST; MEMBRANE SEPARATION; SHAPIRO-WILK TEST;

NANOFILTRATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA); ANIONIC SURFACTANTS; CLEANING; DETERGENTS; NANOFILTRATION; PRESSURE; REMOVAL; SOLUTIONS; TEMPERATURE; WASTEWATER;

DETERGENT; DRINKING WATER; FILTRATION; FOULING; REMOVAL EXPERIMENT; SURFACTANT; TESTING METHOD; WATER QUALITY;

EID: 38349096537     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.087     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Vatai Gy., Máriás K., and Mora M.J. Tenzidek szu{double acute}rheto{double acute}ségének vizsgálata nanoszu{double acute}ro{double acute} membránokkal, Olaj, Szappan. Kozmetika 50 (2001) 232-235
2. Turan M. Influence of filtration conditions on the performance of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes in dairy wastewater treatment. Desalination 170 (2004) 83-90
3. Yamagishi T., Leite J., Ueda S., Yamaguchi F., and Sawa Y. Simultaneous removal of phenol and ammonia by an activated sludge process with crossflow filtration. Water Res. 35 (2001) 3089-3096
4. K. Bélafi-Bako and L. Gubicza, Biocatalysts and membranes, Integration of Membrane Processes into Bioconversions, Kluwer Academic, London, 2000, pp. 131-140.
5. Goers B., Mey J., and Wozny G. Optimised product and water recovery from batch-production rinsing waters. Waste Mgmt. 20 (2000) 651-658
6. Galambos I., Mora M.J., Jaray P., Vatai Gy., and Békássy-Molnár F. High organic content industrial wastewater treatment by membrane filtration. Desalination 162 (2004) 117-120
7. Kaya Y., Aydiner C., Barlas H., and Keskinler B. Nanofiltration of single and mixture solutions containing anionics and non-ionic surfactants below their critical micelle concentrations (CMCs). J.Membr. Sci. 282 (2006) 401-412
8. Vatai Gy., Bekassy-Molnar E., Goers B., Magda S., and Wozny G. CIP water treatment and reuse with membrane separation. Hung. J. Ind. Chem. 28 (2000) 305-310
9. Huang H.L., and Grace Lee W.M. Enhanced naphthalene solubility in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate: effect of critical micelle concentration. Chemosphere 44 (2001) 963-972
10. Forstmeier M., Goers B., and Wozny G. UF/NF treatment of rinsing waters in a liquid detergent production plant. Desalination 149 (2002) 175-177
11. Lenore S. Clesceri, Arnold E. Greenberg and R.Rhodes Trussel, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 17th edn., American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Pollution Control Federation, 1989.
12. Kowalska I., Nowak K.M., and Korbutowicz M.K. Influence of temperature on anionic surface active agent removal from a water solution by ultrafiltration. Desalination 198 (2006) 124-131