Ionization and excitation in collisions between antiprotons and H(1s) atoms studied with Sturmian bases

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Winter, Thomas G ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLISIONAL SYSTEM; CROSS SECTION; GAUSSIANS; HIGH ENERGY; INTERMEDIATE ENERGIES; NUMERICAL RESULTS; PSEUDO STATE; STRONG CONTRAST; STURMIAN;

IONIZATION;

EXCITED STATES;

EID: 79951660844     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.022709     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. T. G. Winter, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.032701 80, 032701 (2009).
2. T. G. Winter, Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 52, 391 (2005).
3. M. McGovern, D. Assafrão, J. R. Mohallem, C. T. Whelan, and H. R. J. Walters, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.042707 79, 042707 (2009).
4. K. A. Hall, J. F. Reading, and A. L. Ford, J. Phys. B JPAPEH 0953-4075 10.1088/0953-4075/29/24/018 29, 6123 (1996).
5. G. Schiwietz, U. Wille, R. Diez Muiño, P. D. Fainstein, and P. L. Grande, J. Phys. B JPAPEH 0953-4075 10.1088/0953-4075/29/2/018 29, 307 (1996). Ionization cross sections, cited as a private communication in Ref. [4], are not actually given in their paper but were necessarily calculated to determine the stopping power.
6. A. Igarashi, S. Nakazaki, and A. Ohsaki, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.062712 61, 062712 (2000).
7. N. Toshima, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.024701 64, 024701 (2001).
8. J. C. Wells, D. R. Schultz, P. Gavras, and M. S. Pindzola, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.593 54, 593 (1996).
9. (Pubitemid 32085440)
10. R. Shakeshaft, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.14.1626 14, 1626 (1976).
11. R. Shakeshaft, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.18.1930 18, 1930 (1978).
12. For the one-center bases, a greater z range has sometimes been used, with < 1 % effect.
13. o, and similarly for the next intervals.
14. There is a single exception: a relative error of 0.003% for the 220-state basis at 2 keV.
15. There is also a 4.7% difference for 3 p at 3 keV.
16. There is also a 3% difference for 4 f at 60 keV.
17. There is a single exception: a 2.9% difference for excitation to all states at 3 keV.
18. There is a 40% difference from the 2 s value of McGovern [3] at 500 keV, but this difference may only be a reading error of their small graphical value.
19. D. R. Schultz, P. S. Krstić, C. O. Reinhold, and J. C. Wells, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2882 76, 2882 (1996).
20. E. Fermi and E. Teller, Phys. Rev. PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.72. 399 72, 399 (1947).
21. H. Knudsen, U. Mikkelsen, K. Paludan, K. Kirsebom, S. P. Møller, E. Uggerhøj, J. Slevin, M. Charlton, and E. Morenzoni, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4627 74, 4627 (1995).