Component specification in the Cactus Framework: The Cactus Configuration Language

Proceedings - IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Grid Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 359-368

  Allen, Gabrielle ^a   Goodale, Tom ^b   Löffler, Frank ^a   Rideout, David ^c   Schnetter, Erik ^d   Seidel, Eric L ^d,e  

^a Louisiana State University   (United States)

^b Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics ^*  (United Kingdom)

^c PERIMETER INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (Canada)

^d LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION EXAMPLES; AS INTERFACES; COMPLEX SYSTEMS; COMPONENT FRAMEWORK; COMPONENT SPECIFICATION; CONFIGURATION LANGUAGES; DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES; DESCRIPTION METHOD; INDIVIDUAL COMPONENTS;

GRID COMPUTING;

EID: 79951641858     PISSN: 15505510     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/GRID.2010.5698008     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Mesh Refinement with Carpet, URL http://www.carpetcode.org/.
2. Pawel Pilarczyk et. al., Chomp, http://chomp.rutgers.edu.
3. T. Goodale, G. Allen, G. Lanfermann, J. Massó, T. Radke, E. Seidel, and J. Shalf, The Cactus framework and toolkit: Design and applications, Vector and Parallel Processing - VECPAR'2002, 5th International Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Berlin), Springer, 2003.
4. Seth Major, David Rideout, and Sumati Surya, Stable homology as an indicator manifoldlikeness in causal set theory, Class.Quant.Grav. 26 (2009), no. 175008, eprint 0902.0434 [gr-qc].
5. Eclipse: An open development platform, URL http://www.eclipse.org/.
6. Erik Schnetter, Multi-physics coupling of einstein and hydrodynamics evolution: a case study of the einstein toolkit, CBHPC '08: Proceedings of the 2008 compFrame/HPC-GECO workshop on Component based high performance (New York, NY, USA), ACM, 2008, pp. 1-9.
7. Erik Schnetter, Peter Diener, Nils Dorband, and Manuel Tiglio, A multiblock infrastructure for three-dimensional time-dependent numerical relativity, Class. Quantum Grav. 23 (2006), S553-S578, eprint grqc/0602104, URL http://stacks.iop.org/CQG/23/S553. (Pubitemid 44150380)
8. Erik Schnetter, Scott H. Hawley, and Ian Hawke, Evolutions in 3D numerical relativity using fixed mesh refinement, Class. Quantum Grav. 21 (2004), no. 6, 1465-1488, eprint gr-qc/0310042. (Pubitemid 38422880)
9. Eric L. Seidel, Gabrielle Allen, Steven Brandt, Frank Löffler, and Erik Schnetter, Simplifying complex software assembly: the component retrieval language and implementation, TG '10: Proceedings of the 2010 TeraGrid Conference (New York, NY, USA), ACM, 2010, pp. 1-8.
10. SimFactory: Herding Numerical Simulations, URL http://www.cct.lsu.edu/ ~eschnett/SimFactory/.
11. The Official YAML Web Site, URL http://yaml.org.
12. Graphviz Graph Visualization Software, URL http://www.graphviz.org.
13. Rafael D. Sorkin, Causal sets: Discrete gravity, Lectures on Quantum Gravity, Proceedings of the Valdivia Summer School, Valdivia, Chile, January 2002 (A. Gomberoff and D. Marolf, eds.), Plenum, 2005, eprint gr-qc/0309009.
14. RDF Semantic Web Standards, URL http://www.w3.org/RDF.
15. Michael Thomas and Erik Schnetter, Simulation factory: Taming application configuration and workflow on high-end resources, CBHPC '10 (New York, NY, USA), ACM, accepted.
16. Cactus Computational Toolkit, URL http://www.cactuscode.org.
17. The Einstein Toolkit, URL http://www.einsteintoolkit.org.