Multi-physics coupling of einstein and hydrodynamics evolution: A case study of the Einstein Toolkit

Proceeding of the Component Based High Performance Workshop - CompFrame/HPC-GECO Workshop Series, CBHPC'08

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Schnetter, Erik ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLOCATED GRID; COUPLING MECHANISM; EFFICIENT COUPLING; HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPUTING; HYDRODYNAMICS CODES; HYDRODYNAMICS EQUATION; MEMORY CONSUMPTION; MULTI-PHYSICS; NUMERICAL RELATIVITY; RELATIVISTIC HYDRODYNAMICS; RESEARCH GROUPS; SOFTWARE FRAMEWORKS; SPACETIME;

EULER EQUATIONS; HYDRODYNAMICS; INTEROPERABILITY; MAXWELL EQUATIONS; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

FLUID DYNAMICS;

EID: 70249124202     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1456190.1456196     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Cactus Computational Toolkit home page, http://www.cactuscode.org/.
2. GR3D: A multi-purpose 3D code for compuational general relativistic astrophysics, http://wugrav.wustl.edu/research/codes/GR3D.
3. Mesh refinement with Carpet, http://www.carpetcode.org/.
4. CactusEinstein Toolkit home page, http://www.cactuscode.org/Community/ NumericalRelativity/.
5. XiRel: Next Generation Infrastructure for Numerical Relativity, http://www.cct.lsu.edu/xirel/.
6. Stress-Energy Tensor, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress-energy-tensor.
7. Cactus benchmarking results, http://www.cactuscode.org/Benchmarks/.
8. CFD Toolkit for Cactus, http://www.cactuscode.org/Community/CFDToolkit/.
9. Whisky, EU Network GR Hydrodynamics Code, http://www.whiskycode.org/.
10. Kranc: Automated Code Generation, http://numrel.aei.mpg.de/Research/ Kranc/.
11. Alpaca: Tools for Application-Level Profiling and Correctness Analysis, http://www.cactuscode.org/Development/alpaca/.
12. Cactus users' guide. http://www.cactuscode.org/.
13. M. Alcubierre, B. Brügmann, P. Diener, M. Koppitz, D. Pollney, E. Seidel, and R. Takahashi. Gauge conditions for long-term numerical black hole evolutions without excision. Phys. Rev. D, 67:084023, 2003.
14. M. Alcubierre, B. Brügmann, T. Dramlitsch, J. A. Font, P. Papadopoulos, E. Seidel, N. Stergioulas, and R. Takahashi. Towards a stable numerical evolution of strongly gravitating systems in general relativity: The conformai treatments. Phys. Rev. D, 62:044034, 2000.
15. R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner. The dynamics of general relativity. In L. Witten, editor, Gravitation: An introduction to current research, pages 227-265. John Wiley, New York, 1962.
16. L. Baiotti, I. Hawke, P. Montero, and L. Rezzolla. A new three-dimensional general-relativistic hydrodynamics code. In R. Capuzzo-Dolcetta, editor, Computational Astrophysics in Italy: Methods and Tools, volume 1, page 210, Trieste, 2003. Mem. Soc. Astron. It. Suppl.
17. L. Baiotti, I. Hawke, P. J. Montero, F. Löffler, L. Rezzolla, N. Stergioulas, J. A. Font, and E. Seidel. Three-dimensional relativistic simulations of rotating neutron star collapse to a Kerr black hole. Phys. Rev. D, 71:024035, 2005.
18. J. A. Faber, T. W. Baumgarte, Z. B. Etienne, S. L. Shapiro, and K. Taniguchi. Relativistic hydrodynamics in the presence of puncture black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 76(10):104021-+, Nov. 2007.
19. B. Giacomazzo and L. Rezzolla. WhiskyMHD: a new numerical code for general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics. Class. Quantum Grav., 24:S235-S258, 2007.
20. T. Goodale, G. Allen, G. Lanfermann, J. Massó, T. Radke, E. Seidel, and J. Shalf. The Cactus framework and toolkit: Design and applications. In Vector and Parallel Processing - VECPAR'2002, 5th International Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin, 2003. Springer.
21. S. Husa, I. Hinder, and C. Lechner. Kranc: a Mathematica application to generate numerical codes for tensorial evolution equations. Comput. Phys. Comm., 174:983-1004, 2006.
22. W. Kastaun. Developing a code for general relativistic hydrodynamics with application to neutron star oscillations. PhD thesis, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, 2007. URN: urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-opus-28031.
23. L. E. Kidder, M. A. Scheel, and S. A. Teukolsky. Extending the lifetime of 3D black hole computations with a new hyperbolic system of evolution equations. Phys. Rev. D, 64:064017, 2001.
24. C. Lechner, D. Alic, and S. Husa. From tensor equations to numerical code - computer algebra tools for numerical relativity. In SYNASC 2004-6th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing, Timisoara, Romania, 2004., http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.SC/0411063.
25. P. Mészáros. Gamma-ray bursts. Rep. Prog. Phys., 69:2259-2321, 2006.
26. L. Oliker, A. Canning, J. Carter, C. Iancu, M. Lijewski, S. Kamil, J. Shalf, H. Shan, E. Strohmaier, S. Ethier, and T. Goodale. Scientific application performance on candidate petascale platforms. In International Parallel & Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS), 2007.
27. C. D. Ott, H. Dimmelmeier, A. Marek, H.-T. Janka, I. Hawke, B. Zink, and E. Schnetter. 3d collapse of rotating stellar iron cores in general relativity including deleptonization and a nuclear equation of state. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98:261101, 2007.
28. C. D. Ott, E. Schnetter, G. Allen, E. Seidel, J. Tao, and B. Zink. A case study for petascale applications in astrophysics: Simulating Gamma-Ray Bursts. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Mardi Gras conference: From lightweight mash-ups to lambda grids: Understanding the spectrum of distributed computing requirements, applications, tools, infrastructures, interoperability, and the incremental adoption of key capabilities, number 18 in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 2008. ACM. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1341811.1341831.
29. C. D. Ott, E. Schnetter, G. Allen, E. Seidel, J. Tao, and B. Zink. A case study for petascale applications in astrophysics: Simulating Gamma-Ray Bursts. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Mardi Gras conference: From lightweight mash-ups to lambda grids: Understanding the spectrum of distributed computing requirements, applications, tools, infrastructures, interoperability, and the incremental adoption of key capabilities, number 18 in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 2008. ACM. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1341811.1341831.
30. W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery S. A. Teukolsky and W. T. Vetterling. Numerical Recipes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1986.
31. E. Schnetter. Gauge fixing for the simulation of black hole spacetimes. PhD thesis, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, 2003. URN: urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-opus-8191.
32. E. Schnetter, P. Diener, E. N. Dorband, and M. Tiglio. A multi-block infrastructure for three-dimensional time-dependent numerical relativity. Class. Quantum Grav., 23:S553-S578, 2006.
33. E. Schnetter, P. Diener, N. Dorband, and M. Tiglio. A multi-block infrastructure for three-dimensional time-dependent numerical relativity. Class. Quantum Grav., 23:S553-S578, 2006.
34. E. Schnetter, S. H. Hawley and I. Hawke. Evolutions in 3D numerical relativity using fixed mesh refinement. Class. Quantum Grav., 21(6):1465-1488, 21 March 2004.
35. E. Schnetter, C. D. Ott, G. Allen, P. Diener, T. Goodale, T. Radke, E. Seidel, and J. Shalf. Cactus Framework: Black holes to gamma ray bursts. In D. A. Bader, editor, Petascale Computing: Algorithms and Applications, chapter 24. Chapman & Hall/CRC Computational Science Series, 2007.
36. J. Shalf, E. Schnetter, G. Allen, and E. Seidel. Cactus as benchmarking platform. Technical Report CCT-TR-2006-3, Louisiana State University, 2007.
37. U. Sperhake. Binary black-hole evolutions of excision and puncture data. Phys. Rev. D, 76:104015, 2007.
38. U. Sperhake, B. Kelly, P. Laguna, K. L. Smith, and E. Schnetter. Black hole head-on collisions and gravitational waves with fixed mesh-refinement and dynamic singularity excision. Phys. Rev. D, 71:124042, 2005.
39. B. Szilágyi, R. Gomez, N. T. Bishop, and J. Winicour. Cauchy boundaries in linearized gravitational theory. Phys. Rev. D, 62:104006, 2000.
40. B. Szilágyi, D. Pollney, L. Rezzolla, J. Thornburg, and J. Winicour. An explicit harmonic code for black-hole evolution using excision. Class. Quantum Grav., 24:S275-S293, 2007.
41. B. Szilágyi and J. Winicour. Well-posed initial-boundary evolution in general relativity. Phys. Rev. D, 68:041501, 2003.
42. B. Vaishnav, I. Hinder, E Herrmann, and D. Shoemaker. Matched filtering of numerical relativity templates of spinning binary black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 76(8):084020-+, Oct. 2007.
43. S. Williams, J. Carter, L. Oliker, J. Shalf, and K. Yelick. Lattice Boltzmann simulation optimiszation on leading multicore platforms. In International Parallel & Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS), 2008.
44. S. E. Woosley and J. S. Bloom. The supernova gamma-ray burst connection. Annual Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 44:507-556, 2006.
45. B. Zink. A general relativistic evolution code on CUDA architectures. Technical Report CCT-TR-2008-1, Louisiana State University, 2007.
46. B. Zink, E. Schnetter, and M. Tiglio. Multi-patch methods in general relativistic astrophysics-I. hydrodynamical flows on fixed backgrounds. Phys. Rev. D, 77:103015, 2008.
47. Y. Zlochower, J. G. Baker, M. Campanelli, and C. O. Lousto. Accurate black hole evolutions by fourth-order numerical relativity. Phys. Rev. D, 72:024021, 2005.