Benchmark Simulation Model No 2: Finalisation of plant layout and default control strategy

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 62, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1967-1974

  Nopens, I ^a   Benedetti, L ^a   Jeppsson, U ^b   Pons, M N ^c   Alex, J ^d   Copp, J B ^e   Gernaey, K V ^f   Rosen, C ^g   Steyer, J P ^h   Vanrolleghem, P A ⁱ  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^d Ifak eV Magdeburg   (Germany)

^e Primodal Inc   (Canada)

^f TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^g Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies   (Sweden)

^h LABORATOIRE DE BIOTECHNOLOGIE DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

ⁱ UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Benchmarking; BSM2; Control; Evaluation criteria; Plant wide modelling; Simulation; Wastewater treatment

Indexed keywords

A PLANTS; BSM2; CONTROL STRATEGIES; EVALUATION CRITERIA; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; PLANT-WIDE MODELLING; PRE-TREATMENT; PROCESS LEVELS; RESEARCH COMMUNITIES; SIMULATION; SIMULATION MODEL; SLUDGE TREATMENT; TASK GROUPS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM; WORK-RELATED;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; BENCHMARKING; PLANT LAYOUT; RATING; RECLAMATION; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER TREATMENT PLANTS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; BENCHMARKING; CONTROL SYSTEM; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RESEARCH WORK; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

BENCHMARK SIMULATION MODEL NO 2; CONTROL; EVALUATION RESEARCH; REVIEW; SIMULATION; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

BENCHMARKING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FACILITY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID;

EID: 79951637536     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2010.044     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. ATV A131 2000 ATV-DVWK Arbeitsblatt A 131: Bemessungen von einstufigen Belebungsanlagen ab 5000 EW. ATV, Hennef, Germany, [in German].
2. Camargo, J. A. & Alonso, Á. 2006 Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: a global assessment. Environm. Int. 32(6), 831-849.
3. Copp, J. B. (ed.) 2002 The COST Simulation Benchmark - Description and Simulator Manual. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, ISBN 92-894-1658-0.
4. Downs, J. J. & Skogestad, S. 2009 An industrial and academic perspective on plantwide control. In: Proc. Int. Symposium on Advanced Control of Chemical Processes (ADCHEM 2009), July 12-15, 2009, Istanbul, Turkey.
5. Gernaey K. V., Jeppsson U., Vanrolleghem P. A, Copp J. B. & Steyer J.-P. (eds) (in preparation). Benchmarking of Control Strategies for Wastewater Treatment Plants (IWA Scientific and Technical Report). IWA Publishing, London.
6. Harris, R. W., Cullinane, M. J. & Sun, P. (eds) 1982 Process Design & Cost Estimating Algorithms for the Computer Assisted Procedure for Design and Evaluation of Wastewater Treatment Systems (CAPDET) USEPA. Office of Water Program Operations.
7. Jeppsson, U. & Pons, M.-N. 2004 The COST 624 benchmark simulation model-current state and future perspective. Editorial. Control Eng. Pract. 12(3), 299-304.
8. Jeppsson, U., Rosen, C., Alex, J., Copp, J. B., Gernaey, K. V., Pons, M.-N. & Vanrolleghem, P. A. 2006 Towards a benchmark simulation model for plant-wide control strategy performance evaluation of WWTPs. Water Sci. Technol. 53(1), 287-295.
9. Jeppsson, U., Pons, M.-N., Nopens, I., Alex, J., Copp, J., Gernaey, K. V., Rosen, C., Steyer, J.-P. & Vanrolleghem, P. A. 2007 Benchmark simulation model no 2-general protocol and exploratory case studies. Water Sci. Technol. 56(8), 67-78.
10. Rosen, C., Jeppsson, U. & Vanrolleghem, P. A. 2004 Towards a common benchmark for long-term process control and monitoring performance evaluation. Water Sci. Technol. 50(11), 41-49.
11. Spanjers, H., Vanrolleghem, P. A., Nguyen, K., Vanhooren, H. & Patry, G. G. 1998 Towards a simulation-benchmark for evaluating respirometry-based control strategies. Water Sci. Technol. 37(12), 219-226.
12. Vanrolleghem, P. A., Jeppsson, U., Carstensen, J., Carlsson, B. & Olsson, G. 1996 Integration of WWT plant design and operation-a systematic approach using cost functions. Water Sci. Technol. 34(3-4), 159-171.