The COST benchmark simulation model-current state and future perspective

Control Engineering Practice

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 299-304

  Jeppsson, Ulf ^a   Pons, Marie Noëlle ^b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

Author keywords

Benchmarking; Control strategy; Modelling; Performance assessment; Simulation; Wastewater treatment

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVALUATION; INDUSTRIAL PLANTS; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

PLATFORM-INDEPENDENT SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT; RESPIROMETRY;

CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

CONTROL METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PROCESS CONTROL; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

EID: 1142281080     PISSN: 09670661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2003.07.001     Document Type: Editorial

References (19)

1. Alex, J., Beteau, J.-F., Copp, J., Hellinga, C., Jeppsson, U., Marsili-Libelli, S., Pons, M.-N., Spanjers, H., & Vanhooren, H. (1999). Benchmark for evaluating control strategies in wastewater treatment plants. Proceedings of the ECC'99 Conference, Karlsruhe, Germany, August 31-September 3, 1999.
2. Alex, J., Rieger, L., Winkler, S., & Siegrist, H. (2003). Progress in sensor technology-progress in process control? Part II: Results from a simulation benchmark study. Water Science and Technology, 47(2), 113-120.
3. Batstone, D. J., Keller, J., Angelidaki, I., Kalyuzhnyi, S. V., Pavlostathis, S. G., Rozzi, A., Sanders, W. T. M., Siegrist, H., & Vavilin, V. A. (2002). Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1. IWA Scientific and Technical Reports No. 13. London, UK: IWA Publishing, ISBN 1-900222-78-7.
4. Copp, J. B. (2000a). Defining a simulation benchmark for control strategies. Water, 21, 44-49.
5. Copp, J. B. (2000b). The COST benchmark: A multi-criteria decision-making problem. COST Action 624: Working Group #3 Meeting, Pitlochry, Scotland, March, 2000.
6. Copp, J. B. (Ed.), (2002). The COST simulation benchmark-description and simulator manual. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, ISBN 92-894-1658-0.
7. Copp, J. B., Jeppsson, U., & Rosen, C. (2003). Towards an ASMI-ADMI state variable interface for plant-wide wastewater treatment modelling. Proceedings of the WEFTEC 2003, Los Angeles, USA, October 11-15, 2003, to appear.
8. Copp, J. B., Spanjers, H., & Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2002). Respirometry in Control of the Activated Sludge Process: Benchmarking Control Strategies. IWA Scientific and Technical Reports No. 11, ISBN 1-900222-51-5. London, UK: IWA Publishing.
9. COST Action 624 website (http://www.ensic.inpl-nancy.fr/COSTWWTP). The European co-operation in the field of scientific and technical research, Action 624: Optimal Management of Wastewater Systems.
10. Henze, M., Grady Jr., C. P. L., Gujer, W., Marais, G. V. R., & Matsuo, T. (1987). Activated Sludge Model No. 1. IAWPRC Scientific and Technical Reports No. 1. London, UK: IWA Publishing.
11. Henze, M., Gujer, W., Mino, T., Matsuo, T., Wentzel, M. C., Marais, G. V. R., & van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. (1999). Activated sludge model no. 2d, ASM2d. Water Science and Technology, 39(1), 165-182.
12. JASS website (http://www.syscon.uu.se/~psa). JASS!-a Java-based activated sludge process simulator.
13. Pons, M.-N., Jeppsson, U., Copp, J.B., Spanjers, H. (2002). Benchmarking of control strategies in wastewater treatment: the four-year story of the cost benchmark. In: Dochain, D., Perrier, M. (Eds.), Computer applications in biotechnology. The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, ISBN 0-08-043681-1.
14. Pons, M.-N., Spanjers, H., & Jeppsson, U. (1999). Towards a benchmark for evaluating control strategies in wastewater treatment plants by simulation. Computers and Chemical Engineering Supplement, 23, S403-S406.
15. Rieger, L., Alex, J., Winkler, S., Boehler, M., Thomann, M., & Siegrist, H. (2003). Progress in sensor technology-progress in process control? Part I: Sensor property investigation and classification. Water Science and Technology, 47(2), 103-112.
16. Samuelsson, P., Ekman, M., & Carlsson, B. (2001). A JAVA based simulator of activated sludge processes. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 56(4-5), 333-346.
17. Spanjers, H., Vanrolleghem, P., Nguyen, K., Vanhooren, H., & Patry, G. G. (1998). Towards a simulation-benchmark for evaluating respirometry-based control strategies. Water Science and Technology, 37(12), 219-226.
18. Takács, I., Patry, G. G., & Nolasco, D. (1991). A dynamic model of the clarification thickening process. Water Research, 25(10), 1263-1271.
19. Vanrolleghem, P., & Gillot, S. (2002). Robustness and economic measures as control benchmark perform criteria. Water Science and Technology, 45(4-5), 117-126.