Effectiveness of noncontrast computed tomography in evaluation of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 684-687

  Park, Jinsung ^a   Hong, Bumsik ^a   Park, Taehan ^a   Hyung, Keun Park ^a  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL SCINTISCANNING; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NEPHROLITHIASIS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PYELOGRAPHY; RENOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY CALCULI; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34548164532     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2006.0352     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Streem SB, Yost A, Mascha E. Clinical implications of clinically insignificant stone fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 1996;155:1186-1190.
2. Khaitan A, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, et al. Post-ESWL, clinically insignificant residual stones: Reality or myth? Urology 2002;59: 20-24.
3. Zanetti G, Montanari E, Mandressi A, et al. Long-term results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in renal stone treatment. J Endourol 1991;5:61-64.
4. Pires C, Machet F, Dahmani L, et al. Sensitivity of abdominal radiography without preparation compared with computed tomography in the assessment of residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Prog Urol 2003;13:581-584.
5. Newman DM, Scott JW, Lingeman JE. Two-year follow-up of patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Endourol 1988;2:163-171.
6. Graff J, Deidrichs W, Schulze H. Long-term followup in 1,003 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients. J Urol 1988;140:479-483.
7. Beck EM, Riehle RA Jr. The fate of residual fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy of infection stones. J Urol 1991;145:6-9.
8. Lim JK, Hyun JS, Chung KH. Cost and effectiveness of different treatment options for renal calculi larger than 2cm. Korean J Urol 2002;43:454-458.
9. Feng MI, Tamaddon K, Mikhail A, et al. Prospective randomized study of various techniques of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 2001;58:345-350.
10. Lojanapiwat B. Previous open nephrolithotomy: Does it affect percutaneous nephrolithotomy techniques and outcome? J Endourol 2006;20:17-20.
11. Lehtoranta K, Mankinen P, Taari K, et al. Residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Sensitivities of different imaging methods in renal stone detection. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1995;84: 43-49.
12. Pearle MS, Watamull LM, Mullican MA. Sensitivity of noncontrast helical computerized tomography and plain film radiography compared to flexible nephroscopy for detecting residual fragments after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 1999;162:23-26.