Clinical and economic evidence supporting a transparent Barrier Film dressing in incontinence-associated dermatitis and peri-wound skin protection

Journal of Wound Care

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 76-84

  Guest, J F ^a,b   Greener, M J ^a   Vowden, K ^c   Vowden, P ^c  

^a CATALYST Health Economics Consultants   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cavilon No Sting Barrier Film; Dermatitis; Incontinence; Petroleum; Wounds; Zinc oxide

Indexed keywords

BANDAGE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DERMATITIS; HUMAN; OCCLUSIVE DRESSING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; URINE INCONTINENCE;

BANDAGES; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DERMATITIS; HUMANS; OCCLUSIVE DRESSINGS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 79951606550     PISSN: 09690700     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2011.20.2.76     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Vowden, K. R., Vowden, P. The prevalence, management, equipment provision and outcome for patients with pressure ulceration identified in a wound care survey within one English health care district. J Tissue Viability 2009;18:1, 20-26.
2. Ferrell, B. A., Josephson, K., Norvid, P. et al. Pressure ulcers among patients admitted to home care. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000;48:9, 1042-1047.
3. Landi, F., Onder, G., Russo, A. et al. Pressure ulcer and mortality in frail elderly people living in community. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2007;44(Suppl 1), 217-223. (Pubitemid 46273724)
4. Thein, H. H., Gomes, T., Krahn, M. D. et al. Health status utilities and the impact of pressure ulcers in long-term care residents in Ontario. Qual Life Res 2010;19:81-89.
5. Lahmann, N. A., Halfens, R. J., Dassen, T Pressure ulcers in German nursing homes and acute care hospitals: prevalence, frequency, and ulcer characteristics. Ostomy Wound Manage 2006;52:20-33.
6. Vowden, K., Vowden, P., Posnett, J. The resource costs of wound care in Bradford and Airedale primary care trust in the UK. J Wound Care 2009;18:93-4, 96-98, 100.
7. National Statistics Office National Projections. Available on line at http://www.statistics.gov. uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=1352. Last accessed 1 June 2010.
8. Bennett, G., Dealey, C., Posnett, J. The cost of pressure ulcers in the UK. Age Ageing 2004;33:230-235. (Pubitemid 38635038)
9. Trueman, P., Whitehead, S. J. The economics of pressure relieving surfaces: an illustrative case study of the impact of high-specification surfaces on hospital finances. Int Wound J 2010;7:48-54.
10. Zehrer, C. L., Lutz, J. B., Hedblom, E. C. et al. A comparison of cost and efficacy of three incontinence skin barrier products. Ostomy Wound Manage 2004;50:51-58.
11. Neander, K. D., Hesse, F. The protective effects of a new preparation on wound edges. J Wound Care 2003;12:369-371.
12. Williams, C. 3M Cavilon no sting barrier film in the protection of vulnerable skin. Br J Nursing 1998;7:613-615.
13. Schuren, J., Becker, A., Sibbald, R. G. A liquid film-forming acrylate for peri-wound protection: a systematic review and meta-analysis (3M Cavilon no-sting barrier film). Int Wound J 2005;2:230-238.
14. Green, J. Guidelines on Complications of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. British Society of Gastroenterology November 2006. Available on line at: http://tinyurl.com/6fz2slm Last accessed 27 May 2010.
15. Graham, R., Browne, L., Capp, A. et al. Randomized, paired comparison of No-Sting Barrier Film versus sorbolene cream (10% glycerine) skin care during postmastectomy irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;58:241-246. (Pubitemid 38010358)
16. Tanioka, M., Miyachi, Y. Waterpro of camouflage for vitiligo of the face using Cavilon 3M as a spray. Eur J Dermatol 2008;18:93-94. (Pubitemid 351158191)
17. O'Shaughnessy, K. D., De La Garza, M., Roy, N. X. et al. Homeostasis of the epidermal barrier layer: a theory of how occlusion reduces hypertrophic scarring. Wound Repair Regen 2009;17:700-708.
18. Issberner, K., Schuren J. A Comparative Study of the Skin Protectant Performance of Five Barrier Films. 2005 Available on line at http://tinyurl.com/67qk6js. Last accessed 27 May 2010.
19. Zimmaro Bliss, D., Zehrer, C., Savik, K. et al. Incontinence-associated skin damage in nursing home residents: a secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter study. Ostomy Wound Manage 2006;52:46-55.
20. Junkin, J., Selekof, J.L. Prevalence of incontinence and associated skin injury in the acute care inpatient. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2007;34:260-269.
21. Moore, Z., Cowman, S. Reviewing the evidence for selecting cleansing fluids for pressure ulcers. Nurs Times 2009;105:22-24.
22. Baatenburg de Jong, H., Admiraal, H. Comparing cost per use of 3M Cavilon No Sting Barrier Film with zinc oxide oil in incontinent patients. J Wound Care 2004;13:398-400.
23. Bale, S., Tebble, N., Jones, V. et al. The benefits of implementing a new skin care protocol in nursing homes. Journal of Tissue Viability 2004;14:44-50.
24. Bliss, D. Z., Zehrer, C., Savik, K. et al. An economic evaluation of four skin damage prevention regimens in nursing home residents with incontinence: economics of skin damage prevention. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2007;34:143-52.
25. Registered Nursing Home Association. 20 Key Facts about Nursing Homes. Available on line at http://www.rnha.co.uk/web-images/pdfs/20-key-facts.pdf. Last accessed 28 May 2010.
26. Kirker, K. R., Secor, P. R., James, G. A. et al. Loss of viability and induction of apoptosis in human keratinocytes exposed to Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in vitro. Wound Repair Regen 2009;17:690-699.
27. Cameron, J., Hoffman, D., Wilson, J. et al. Comparison of two peri-wound skin protectants in venous leg ulcers: a randomised controlled trial. J Wound Care 2005;14:233-236.
28. James, G. A., Swogger, E., Wolcott, R. et al. Biofilms in chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen 2008;16:37-44.
29. Werthén, M., Henriksson, L., Jensen, P. Ø. et al. An in vitro model of bacterial infections in wounds and other soft tissues. APMIS 2010;118:156-164.
30. Coutts, R., Queen, D., Sibbald, R. G. Peri-wound skin protection: A comparison of a new skin barrier vs traditional therapies in wound management. Clinical Practice 2003, http://www.cawc.net/images/uploads/wcc/coutts-periwound. html. Last accessed 27 May 2010.
31. Moffatt, C. J., Franks, P. J., Doherty, D. C. et al. Prevalence of leg ulceration in a London population. QJM 2004;97:431-437. (Pubitemid 38967417)
32. Office For National Statistics. Available online at http://www. statistics.gov. uk/statbase/Product.asp?vlnk=15106 Last Accessed 1 February 2011.
33. Brown, G. Long-term outcomes of full-thickness pressure ulcers: healing and mortality. Ostomy Wound Manage 2003;49:10, 42-50.
34. Black, P. Peristomal skin care: an overview of available products. Br J Nurs 2007;16:1048-1056.
35. Vujnovich. A. The management of stoma-related skin complications. Wounds UK 2006;2:3, 36-47. (Pubitemid 44535014)
36. Gray, M. Optimal management of incontinence-associated dermatitis in the elderly. Am J Clin Dermatol 2010;11:201-210.