Incontinence-associated skin amage in nursing home residents: A secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter study

Ostomy Wound Management

Volumn 52, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 46-55

  Bliss, Donna Zimmaro ^a   Zehrer, Cindy ^b   Savik, Kay ^b   Thayer, Debra ^b   Smith, Graham ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Dermatitis; Incontinence; Moisture barrier; Nursing home; Pressure ulcer; Skin damage; Skin treatment

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BED REST; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COGNITIVE DEFECT; DIAPER; DIAPER DERMATITIS; EDUCATION; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NURSING; NURSING HOME; NURSING STAFF; PREVALENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SKIN CARE; STANDARD; TIME; UNITED STATES; URINE INCONTINENCE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BED REST; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; COGNITION DISORDERS; DIAPER RASH; DIAPERS, ADULT; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; NURSING HOMES; NURSING STAFF; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PREVALENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SKIN CARE; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 34047180178     PISSN: 08895899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bliss DZ, Savik K, Harms S, Fan Q, Wyman JF. Prevalence and correlates of perineal dermatitis in nursing home residents. Nurs Res. 2006;55 (4):243-251.
2. Bale S, Tebble N, Jones V, Price P. The benefits of implementing a new skin care protocol in nursing homes. J Tissue Viability. 2004; 14(2):46-50.
3. Zehrer CL, Lutz JB, Hedblom EC, Ding L. A comparison of cost and efficacy of three incontinence skin barrier products. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2004;50(12):51-58.
4. Lewis-Byers K, Thayer D. An evaluation of two incontinence skin care protocols in a long-term care setting. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002;48 (12):44-51.
5. Doughty D, Ramundo J, Bonham P, et al. Issues and challenges in staging of pressure ulcers. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2006;33 (2):125-130.
6. Bouten CV, Oomens CW, Baaijens FP, Bader DL The etiology of pressure ulcers: skin deep or muscle bound? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84 (4):616-619.
7. Braden B, Bergstrom N. A conceptual schema for the study of the etiology of pressure sores. Rehabil Nurs. 1987;12:8-12.
8. Savik K, Fan Q, Bliss DZ, Harms S. Preparing the MDS dataset for analysis in the study of risk factors of perineal dermatitis. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52 (4):399-409.
9. Bliss DZ, Zehrer C, Smith G, Hedblom E. An economic evaluation of skin damage prevention regimens among nursing home residents with incontinence. J WOCN. In press.
10. The Seymour Butts 900 Wound Care Model (health care model). Oregon City, Oregon. VATA, Inc. Anatomical Health Care Models. Available online at: http://www.vatainc.com/prostores/servlet/StoreFront. Accessed October 13, 2006.
11. Le Lievre S. The management and prevention of incontinence dermatitis. Br J Community Nurs. 2001;6 (4):180-185.
12. Fiers S, Thayer D. Management of intractable incontinence. In: Doughty DB, ed. Urinary & Fecal Incontinence: Nursing Management, 2nd ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby, Inc.; 2000:183-206.
13. Gray M. Preventing and managing perineal dermatitis: a shared goal for wound and continence care. J WOCN. 2004;31(suppl 1):S2-S9.
14. Food and Drug Administration. Good Clinical Practice. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1996. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/ 959fnl.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2004.
15. Department of Health and Human Services. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. Available at: http://aspe.hhs.gov/admnsimp/ pl104191.htm. Accessed March 15, 2004.
16. Morris JN, Fries BE, Mehr DR, et al. MDS Cognitive Performance Scale. J Gerontol. 1994;49(4):M174-M182.
17. Institute of Medicine. Nurse Staffing in Hospitals and Nursing Homes: Is it Adequate? Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1996.
18. Horn SD, Buerhaus P, Bergstrom N, Smout RJ. RN staffing time and outcomes of long-stay nursing home residents: pressure ulcers and other adverse outcomes are less likely as RNs spend more time on direct patient care. Am J Nurs. 2005;105(11):58-70.
19. Johnson-Pawlson J, Infeld DL Nurse staffing and quality of care in nursing facilities. J Gerontol Nurs. 1996;22(8):36-45.
20. Gray M, Ratliff C, Donovan A. Perineal skin care for the incontinent patient. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2002;15(4):170-175; quiz,177-178.
21. Haugen V. Perineal skin care for patients with frequent diarrhea or fecal incontinence. Gastroenterol Nurs. 1997;20 (3):87-90.
22. Hess CT. Fundamental strategies for skin care. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1997;43(8):32-36,38, 40-41.
23. Fiers SA. Breaking the cycle: the etiology of incontinence dermatitis and evaluating and using skin care products. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1996;42(3):32-34,36,38-40.
24. Kemp MG. Protecting the skin from moisture and associated irritants. J Gerontol Nurs. 1994;20(9):8-14.
25. Pieper B, Mott M. Nurses' knowledge of pressure ulcer prevention, staging, and description. Adv Wound Care. 1995;8(3):34,38,40.
26. Defloor T, Schoonhoven L. Inter-rater reliability of the EPUAP pressure ulcer classification system using photographs. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13(8):952-959.
27. Lyder CH, Clemes-Lowrance C, Davis A, Sullivan L, Zucker A. Structured skin care regimen to prevent perineal dermatitis in the elderly. J ET Nurs. 1992;19(1):12-16.