Validation of web-based administration of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12)

International Urogynecology Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 357-361

  Parnell, Brent A ^a   Dunivan, Gena C ^a   Connolly, Annamarie ^a   Jannelli, Mary L ^a   Wells, Ellen C ^a   Geller, Elizabeth J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Pelvic organ prolapse; PISQ 12; Quality of life; Sexual function; Web based questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE URINARY INCONTINENCE SEXUAL FUNCTION QUESTIONNAIRE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; URINE INCONTINENCE; VALIDATION STUDY;

EID: 79951594731     PISSN: 09373462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-010-1297-8     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. I Nygaard MD Barber KL Burgio K Kenton S Meikle J Schaffer, et al. 2008 Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women JAMA 300 11 1311 1316 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtFGisLjN 10.1001/jama.300.11.1311 18799443
2. GR Rogers A Villarreal D Kammerer-Doak C Qualls 2001 Sexual function in women with and without urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12 6 361 365 1:STN:280: DC%2BD38%2FmvFGitQ%3D%3D 10.1007/s001920170012 11795636 (Pubitemid 34048492)
3. RG Rogers D Kammerer-Doak A Villarreal K Coates C Qualls 2001 A new instrument to measure sexual function in women with urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse Am J Obstet Gynecol 184 4 552 558 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3M7mtl2nug%3D%3D 10.1067/mob.2001.111100 11262452 (Pubitemid 32234965)
4. RG Rogers KW Coates D Kammerer-Doak S Khalsa C Qualls 2003 A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14 3 164 168 10.1007/s00192-003-1063-2 12955337 discussion 168 (Pubitemid 41490366)
5. JC Newman DC Des Jarlais CF Turner J Gribble P Cooley D Paone 2002 The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes Am J Public Health 92 2 294 297 10.2105/AJPH.92.2.294 11818309 (Pubitemid 34101445)
6. CF Turner L Ku SM Rogers LD Lindberg JH Pleck FL Sonenstein 1998 Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology Science 280 5365 867 873 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXjtFGqtbc%3D 10.1126/science.280.5365.867 9572724 (Pubitemid 28215590)
7. HE Drummond S Ghosh A Ferguson D Brackenridge B Tiplady 1995 Electronic quality of life questionnaires: a comparison of pen-based electronic questionnaires with conventional paper in a gastrointestinal study Qual Life Res 4 1 21 26 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3islWhuw%3D%3D 10.1007/BF00434379 7711686
8. JM Ryan JR Corry R Attewell MJ Smithson 2002 A comparison of an electronic version of the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire to the standard paper version Qual Life Res 11 1 19 26 10.1023/A:1014415709997 12003052 (Pubitemid 34293383)
9. EJ Geller ER Barbee JM Wu MJ Loomis AG Visco 2007 Validation of telephone administration of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires Am J Obstet Gynecol 197 6 631 634 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.019 (Pubitemid 350166255)
10. S Kwon AG Visco MP Fitzgerald W Ye WE Whitehead 2005 Validity and reliability of the Modified Manchester Health Questionnaire in assessing patients with fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 48 2 323 331 10.1007/s10350-004-0899-y 15616750 discussion 331-324 (Pubitemid 40576564)
11. PC Hewett BS Mensch MC Ribeiro HE Jones SA Lippman MR Montgomery, et al. 2008 Using sexually transmitted infection biomarkers to validate reporting of sexual behavior within a randomized, experimental evaluation of interviewing methods Am J Epidemiol 168 2 202 211 10.1093/aje/kwn113 18525081 (Pubitemid 351951597)
12. JG Richter A Becker T Koch M Nixdorf R Willers R Monser, et al. 2008 Self-assessments of patients via Tablet PC in routine patient care: comparison with standardised paper questionnaires Ann Rheum Dis 67 12 1739 1741 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cjjsVaqtw%3D%3D 10.1136/ard.2008.090209 18647853
13. BD Bliven SE Kaufman JA Spertus 2001 Electronic collection of health-related quality of life data: validity, time benefits, and patient preference Qual Life Res 10 1 15 22 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvmtlOhtQ%3D%3D 10.1023/A:1016740312904 11508472 (Pubitemid 32682124)
14. VL Handa MD Barber SB Young MP Aronson A Morse GW Cundiff 2008 Paper versus web-based administration of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire 7 Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19 10 1331 1335 10.1007/s00192-008-0651-6 18488134
15. R Theiler HA Bischoff-Ferrari M Good N Bellamy 2004 Responsiveness of the electronic touch screen WOMAC 3.1 OA index in a short term clinical trial with rofecoxib Osteoarthritis Cartilage 12 11 912 916 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2crjtFKgsw%3D%3D 10.1016/j.joca.2004.08.006 15501407 (Pubitemid 39462606)
16. EL Whitcomb G Rortveit JS Brown JM Creasman DH Thom SK Van Den Eeden, et al. 2009 Racial differences in pelvic organ prolapse Obstet Gynecol 114 6 1271 1277 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bf9cc8 19935029