Paper versus web-based administration of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire 7

International Urogynecology Journal

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1331-1335

  Handa, Victoria L ^a   Barber, Matthew D ^b   Young, Stephen B ^c   Aronson, Michael P ^c   Morse, Abraham ^c   Cundiff, Geoffrey W ^d  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BAYVIEW MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Electronic questionnaire; Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory; Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PELVIC FLOOR DISTRESS INVENTORY 20; PELVIC FLOOR IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE 7; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; STUDENT T TEST;

EID: 51949111627     PISSN: 09373462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-008-0651-6     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. de Tayrac R, Picone O, Chauveaud-Lambling A, Fernandez H (2006) A 2-year anatomical and functional assessment of transvaginal rectocele repair using a polypropylene mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(2):100-105
2. Barber MD, Kuchibhatla MN, Pieper CF, Bump RC (2001) Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185(6):1388-1395
3. Lukacz ES, Lawrence JM, Contreras R, Nager CW, Luber KM (2006) Parity, mode of delivery, and pelvic floor disorders. Obstet Gynecol 107(6):1253-1260
4. Fitzgerald MP, Janz NK, Wren PA et al (2007) Prolapse severity, symptoms and impact on quality of life among women planning sacrocolpopexy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 98(1):24-28
5. Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC (2005) Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(1):103-113
6. Bushnell DM, Martin ML, Parasuraman B (2003) Electronic versus paper questionnaires: A further comparison in persons with asthma. J Asthma 40(7):751-7620
7. Bushnell DM, Reilly MC, Galani C et al (2006) Validation of electronic data capture of the irritable bowel syndrome - Quality of Life Measure, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for Irritable Bowel Syndrome and the EuroQol. Value Health 9(2):98-105
8. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Vondechend M, Bellamy N, Theiler R (2005) Validation and patient acceptance of a computer touch screen version of the WOMAC 3.1 osteoarthritis index. Ann Rheum Dis 64(1):80-84
9. Cook AJ, Roberts DA, Henderson MD, Van Winkle LC, Chastain DC, Hamill-Ruth RJ (2004) Electronic pain questionnaires: A randomized, crossover comparison with paper questionnaires for chronic pain assessment. Pain 110(1-2):310-317
10. Velikova G, Wright EP, Smith AB et al (1999) Automated collection of quality-of-life data: A comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. J Clin Oncol 17(3):998-1007
11. Kleinman L, Leidy NK, Crawley J, Bonomi A, Schoenfeld P (2001) A comparative trial of paper-and-pencil versus computer administration of the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire. Med Care 39(2):181-189
12. Turner CF, Ku L, Rogers SM, Lindberg LD, Pleck JH, Sonenstein FL (1998) Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science 280(5365):867-873
13. Kissinger P, Rice J, Farley T et al (1999) Application of computer-assisted interviews to sexual behavior research. Am J Epidemiol 149(10):950-954
14. Tourangeau R, Smith T (1996) Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context. Public Opin Q 60(2):275-304
15. Streiner DL, Norman GR (1995) Methods of administration. In: Streiner DL, Norman GR (eds) Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. 2nd edn. Oxford Medical, New York, NY, pp 189-205
16. Baron G, Tubach F, Ravaud P, Logeart I, Dougados M (2007) Validation of a short form of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function subscale in hip and knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 57(4):633-638