Comparisons of outcomes after single or multilevel dynamic stabilization: Effects on adjacent segment

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 60-67

  Kim, Chi Heon ^a,b   Chung, Chun Kee ^a,b   Jahng, Tae Ahn ^a,b  

^a Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

adjacent segment; dynamic stabilization; lumbar; spine

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; LORDOSIS; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; RISK FACTOR; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE STABILIZATION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; X RAY;

AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL DISEASES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79951588075     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181d4eb44     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Schmoelz W, Huber JF, Nydegger T, et al. Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16:418-423.
2. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, et al. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine. 2004;29:1938-1944. (Pubitemid 39181056)
3. Sapkas GS, Themistocleous GS, Mavrogenis AF, et al. Stabilization of the lumbar spine using the dynamic neutralization system. Orthopedics. 2007;30:859-865. (Pubitemid 350032736)
4. Schulte TL, Hurschler C, Haversath M, et al. The effect ofdynamic, semi-rigid implants on the range of motion of lumbar motion segments after decompression. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:1057-1065.
5. Mulholland RC, Sengupta DK. Rationale, principles and experi-mental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilization. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(suppl 2):S198-S205. (Pubitemid 35244955)
6. Markwalder TM, Wenger M. Dynamic stabilization of lumbar motion segments by use of Graf s ligaments: results with an average follow-up of 7.4 years in 39 highly selected, consecutive patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2003;145:209-214; discussion 214. (Pubitemid 36359702)
7. Schwarzenbach O, Berlemann U, Stoll TM, et al. Posterior dynamic stabilization systems: dynesys. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005;36: 363-372. (Pubitemid 40805097)
8. Sengupta DK. Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low back pain. Neurol India. 2005;53:466-474.
9. Schnake KJ, Schaeren S, Jeanneret B. Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degen-erativespondylolisthesis. Spine. 2006;31:442-449. (Pubitemid 43361743)
10. Bellini CM, Galbusera F, Raimondi MT, et al. Biomechanics of the lumbar spine after dynamic stabilization. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20:423-429. (Pubitemid 47357499)
11. Nockels RP. Dynamic stabilization in the surgical management of painful lumbar spinal disorders. Spine. 2005;30:S68-S72. (Pubitemid 41208820)
12. Khoueir P, Kim KA, Wang MY. Classification of posterior dynamic stabilization devices. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;22:E3.
13. Korovessis P, Papazisis Z, Lambiris E. The role of rigid vs. dynamic instrumentation for stabilization of the degenerative lumbosacral spine. Stud Health TechnolInform. 2002;91:457-461.
14. Kumar A, Beastall J, Hughes J, et al. Disc changes in the bridged and adjacent segments after Dynesys dynamic stabilization system after two years. Spine. 2008;33:2909-2914.
15. Wurgler-Hauri CC, Kalbarczyk A, Wiesli M, et al. Dynamic neutralization of the lumbar spine after microsurgical decompres-sion in acquired lumbar spinal stenosis and segmental instability. Spine. 2008;33:E66-E72. (Pubitemid 351322944)
16. Bothmann M, Kast E, Boldt GJ, et al. Dynesys fixation for lumbar spine degeneration. Neurosurg Rev. 2008;31:189-196. (Pubitemid 351421915)
17. Kanayama M, Hashimoto T, Shigenobu K, et al. A minimum 10-year follow-up of posterior dynamic stabilization using Graf artificial ligament. Spine. 2007;32:1992-1996. (discussion 1997). (Pubitemid 47301002)
18. Lee SE, Park SB, Jahng TA, et al. Clinical experience of the dynamic stabilization system for the degenerative spine disease. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2008;43:221-226.
19. Cheng BC, Gordon J, Cheng J, et al. Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumfer-ential fusion. Spine. 2007;32:2551-2557. (Pubitemid 350059481)
20. Rohlmann A, Burra NK, Zander T, et al. Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:1223-1231. (Pubitemid 350104607)
21. Niosi CA, Wilson DC, Zhu Q, et al. The effect ofdynamic posterior stabilization on facetjoint contact forces: an in vitro investigation. Spine. 2008;33:19-26.
22. Schaeren S, Broger I, Jeanneret B. Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization. Spine. 2008;33: E636-E642.
23. Rohlmann A, Calisse J, Bergmann G, et al. Internal spinal fixator stiffness has only a minor influence on stresses in the adjacent discs. Spine. 1999;24:1192-1195. (discussion 1195).
24. Cunningham BW, Kotani Y, McNulty PS, et al. The effect ofspinal destabilization and instrumentation on lumbar intradiscal pressure: an in vitro biomechanical analysis. Spine. 1997;22:2655-2663. (Pubitemid 28070657)
25. Kim DY, Lee SH, Lee HY, et al. Validation of the Korean version of the oswestry disability index. Spine. 2005;30:E123-E127.
26. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, et al. Magnetic resonance classification oflumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine. 2001; 26:1873-1878. (Pubitemid 32844681)
27. Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, et al. Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. a comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:1459-1467. (Pubitemid 47389489)
28. Matsumura A, Taneichi H, Suda K, et al. Comparative study of radiographic disc height changes using two different interbody devices for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: open box vs. fenestrated tube interbody cage. Spine. 2006;31:E871-E876. (Pubitemid 44673367)
29. Chow DH, Luk KD, Evans JH, et al. Effects of short anterior lumbar interbody fusion on biomechanics of neighboring unfused segments. Spine. 1996;21:549-555. (Pubitemid 26077792)
30. Rohlmann A, Neller S, Bergmann G, et al. Effect of an internal fixator and a bone graft on intersegmental spinal motion and intradiscal pressure in the adjacent regions. Eur Spine J. 2001;10: 301-308. (Pubitemid 32762774)
31. Yang JY, Lee JK, Song HS. The impact of adjacent segment degeneration on the clinical outcome after lumbar spinal fusion. Spine. 2008;33:503-507. (Pubitemid 351644453)
32. Schulte TL, Leistra F, Bullmann V, et al. Disc height reduction in adjacent segments and clinical outcome 10 years after lumbar 360 degrees fusion. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:2152-2158. (Pubitemid 350276100)
33. Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O. The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(suppl 2):S170-S178. (Pubitemid 35244951)
34. Dekutoski MB, Schendel MJ, Ogilvie JW, et al. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro adjacent segment motion after lumbar fusion. Spine. 1994;19:1745-1751. (Pubitemid 24314184)
35. Phillips FM, Reuben J, Wetzel FT. Intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to a lumbar fusion. an experimental rabbit model. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:289-294. (Pubitemid 34257700)
36. Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Adjacent segment disease followinglumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instru-mentation: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine. 2007;32:2253-2257. (Pubitemid 47415109)
37. Markwalder TM, Wenger M. Adjacent-segment morbidity. Jneurosurg. 2002;96:139-140.