Public and private sector accounting - The non-identical twins

Australian Accounting Review

Volumn 9, Issue 18, 1999, Pages 22-31

  Barton, Allan ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844460185     PISSN: 10356908     EISSN: 18352561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.1999.tb00105.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Australian National Audit Office, 199798, annual report.
2. Barton, A.D., 1999a, “Land Under Roads - A Financial Bonanza or Fool’s Gold?", Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 9, No. 1, March, pp. 9-15.
3. Barton, A.D., 1999b, “A Trusteeship Theory of Accounting for Natural Capital Assets”, Abacus, 35 (2), June, pp. 207-22.
4. Burritt, R., M. McCrae., and C. Benjamin., 1996, “What is a Public Sector Asset?", Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 6, No. 1, March, pp. 23-8.
5. Carnegie, G., and P. Wolnizer., 1995, “The Financial Value of Cultural, Heritage and Scientific Collections: An Accounting Fiction”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 5, No. 1, June, pp. 31-47.
6. Carnegie, G., and P. Wolnizer., 1997, “The Financial Reporting of Publicly-Owned Collections: Whither Financial (Market) Values and Contingent Valuation Estimates?", Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, May, pp. 44-50.
7. Carnegie, G., and P. Wolnizer., 1999, “Unravelling the Rhetoric About the Financial Reporting of Public Collections as Assets”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 9, No. 1, March, pp. 16-21.
8. Glazer, A., and M. Jaenicke., 1991, “The Conceptual Framework, Museum Collections and User-Oriented Financial Statements”, Accounting Horizons, 5(4), December, pp. 28-43.
9. Granoff, M., 1998, Government and Not-For-Profit Accounting. Concepts and Practices, Wiley.
10. Guthrie, J., 1998, “Application of Accrual Accounting in the Australian Public Sector - Rhetoric or Reality?", Financial Accountability and Management, 14(1), February, pp. 1-19.
11. Malkin, J., and A. Wildavsky., 1991, “Why The Traditional Distinction Between Public and Private Goods Should Be Abandoned”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 355-78.
12. Management Advisory Board (MAB), 1993, Accountability in the Commonwealth Public Sector, June.
13. Mautz, R., 1988, “Monuments, Mistakes and Opportunities”, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 123-28.
14. McGregor, W., 1999, “The Pivotal Role of Accounting Concepts in the Development of Public Sector Accounting Standards”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 9, No. 1, March, pp. 3-8.
15. Musgrave, R., and P. Musgrave., 1988, Public Finance in Theory and Practice, 5th edition, McGraw-Hill.
16. McCrae, M., and M. Aiken., 1994, “AAS 29 and Public Sector Reporting: Unresolved Issues”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 65-72.
17. Pallot, J., 1990, “The Nature of Public Sector Assets: A Reply to Mautz”, Accounting Horizons, June, pp. 79-85.
18. Pallot, J., 1992, “Elements of a Theoretical Framework for Public Sector Accounting”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journa, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 38-59.
19. Self, P., 1993, Government by the Market? The Politics of Public Choice, Macmillan.
20. Stiglitz, J., 1988, Economics of the Public Sector, 2nd edition, Norton.