Time series analysis of postural responses to combined visual pitch and support surface tilt

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 491, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 138-142

  Slaboda, Jill C ^a   Lauer, Richard ^a,b   Keshner, Emily A ^a,b  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Temple University   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Functional Principal Component Analysis; Posture; Time series analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PATHOLOGY; PITCH; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; POSTURAL BALANCE; POSTURE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROPRIOCEPTION; ROTATION; VISUAL FIELDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79951577033     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.01.024     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Creath R., Kiemel T., Horak F.B., Jeka J.J. The role of vestibular and somatosensory systems in intersegmental control of upright stance. J. Vestib. Res. 2008, 18:39-49.
2. Dozza M., Chiari L., Horak F. A portable audio-biofeedback system to improve postural control. IEEE EMBS 2004, 7:4799-4802.
3. Dozza M., Horak F., Chiari L. Auditory biofeedback substitutes for loss of sensory information in maitaining stance. Exp. Brain Res. 2007, 178:37-48.
4. Duhamel A., Devos P., Bourriez J., Preda C., Defebvre L., Beuscart R. Functional data analysis for gait curves study in Parkinson's disease. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2006, 124:569-574.
5. Dvorkin A.Y., Kenyon R.V., Keshner E.A. Effects of roll visual motion on online control of arm movement: reaching within a dynamic virtual environment. Exp. Brain Res. 2009, 193:95-107.
6. Gokulakrishnan P., Lawrence A.D., McLellan P.J., Grandmaison E.W. A functional-PCA approach for analyzing and reducing complex chemical mechanisms. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2006, 30:1093-1101.
7. Gurse S., Kenyon R., Keshner E.A. Examination of time-varying kinematic responses to support surface disturbances. 7th IFAC Symposium on Modeling and Control in Biomedical Systems 2009.
8. Hughey L., Fung J. Postural responses triggered by multidirectional leg lifts and surface tilts. Exp. Brain Res. 2005, 162:152-166.
9. Keshner E.A., Allum J.H., Pfaltz C.R. Postural coactivation and adaptation in the sway stabilizing responses of normals and patients with bilateral vestibular deficit. Exp. Brain Res. 1987, 69:77-92.
10. Keshner E.A., Dhaher Y. Characterizing head motion in three planes during combined visual and base of support disturbances in healthy and visually sensitive subjects. Gait Posture 2008, 28:127-134.
11. Keshner E.A., Kenyon R.V. The influence of an immersive virtual environment on the segmental organization of postural stabilizing responses. J. Vestib. Res. 2000, 10:207-219.
12. Keshner E.A., Kenyon R.V., Langston J. Postural responses exhibit multisensory dependencies with discordant visual and support surface motion. J. Vestib. Res. 2004, 14:307-319.
13. Kiemel T., Elahi A.J., Jeka J.J. Identification of the plant for upright stance in humans: multiple movement patterns from a single neural strategy. J. Neurophysiol. 2008, 100:3394-3406.
14. Lauer R.T., Johnston T.E., Smith B.T., Lee S.C. Lower extremity muscle activity during cycling in adolescents with and without cerebral palsy. Clin. Biomech. 2008, 23:442-449.
15. Lauer R.T., Smith B.T., Shewokis P.A., McCarthy J.J., Tucker C.A. Time-frequency changes in electromyographic signals after hamstring lengthening surgery in children with cerebral palsy. J. Biomech. 2007, 40:2738-2743.
16. Lauer R.T., Stackhouse C., Shewokis P.A., Smith B.T., Orlin M., McCarthy J.J. Assessment of wavelet analysis of gait in children with typical development and cerebral palsy. J. Biomech. 2005, 38:1351-1357.
17. Lauer R.T., Stackhouse C.A., Shewokis P.A., Smith B.T., Tucker C.A., McCarthy J. A time-frequency based electromyographic analysis technique for use in cerebral palsy. Gait Posture 2007, 26:420-427.
18. Loughlin P., Redfern M. Analysis and modeling of human postural control. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 2003, 22:18.
19. Loughlin P.J., Redfern M.S., Furman J.M. Nonstationarities of postural sway. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 2003, 22:69-75.
20. Mauer C., Mergner T., Peterka R.J. Mulitsensory control of human upright stance. Exp. Brain Res. 2006, 171:231-250.
21. McCollum G., Roberts P. Dynamics of everyday life: rigorous modular modeling in neurobiology based on Bloch's dynamic theorem. J. Integr. Neurosci. 2004, 3:397-413.
22. Nashner L. Fixed patterns of rapid postural responses among leg muscles during stance. Exp. Brain Res. 1977, 30:13-24.
23. Nashner L. Vestibular postural control model. Kybernetik 1972, 10:106-110.
24. Nashner L., Berthoz A. Visual contribution to rapid motor responses during postural control. Brain Res. 1978, 150:403-407.
25. Nashner L., Black F., Wall C. Adaptation to altered support and visual conditions during stance: patients with vestibular deficits. J. Neurosci. 1982, 2:536-544.
26. Peterka R. Simple model of sensory interaction in human postural control. Multisensory Control of Posture 1995, 282-288. Plenum Press, New York City. T. Mergner, F. Hlavacka (Eds.).
27. Previc F.H. The effects of dynamic visual stimulation on perception and motor control. J. Vestib. Res. 1992, 2:285-295.
28. Ramsay J., Silverman B. Applied Functional Data Analysis 2002, Springer-Verlag, New York.
29. Ramsay J., Silverman B. Functional Data Analysis 2005, Springer, New York.
30. Roberts P., McCollum G. Dynamics of sit-to-stand movements. Biol. Cybern. 1996, 74:147-157.
31. Schumann T., Redfern M., Furman J., El-Jaroudi A., Charparro L. Time-frequency analysis of postural sway. J. Biomech. 1995, 28:603-607.
32. Shemmell J., Johansson J., Portra V., Gottlieb G.L., Thomas J.S., Corcos D.M. Control of interjoint coordination during the swing phase of normal gait at different speeds. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2007, 4:10.
33. Shin Y.-J., Gobert D., Sung S.-H., Powers E., Park J. Application f cross time-frequency analysis to postural sway behavior: the effects of aging and visual systems. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2005, 52:859-868.
34. Slaboda J.C., Barton J.E., Maitin I.B., Keshner E.A. Visual field dependence influences balance in patients with stroke. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2009, 2009:1147-1150.
35. Streepey J.W., Kenyon R.V., Keshner E.A. Field of view and base of support width influence postural responses to visual stimuli during quiet stance. Gait Posture 2007, 25:49-55.
36. Streepey J.W., Kenyon R.V., Keshner E.A. Visual motion combined with base of support width reveals variable field dependency in healthy young adults. Exp. Brain Res. 2007, 176:182-187.
37. Vuillerme N., Bertrand R., Pinsault N. Postural effects of the scaled display of visual foot center of pressure feedback under different somatosensory conditions at the foot and the ankle. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2008, 89:2034-2036.
38. Wang Y., Kenyon R.V., Keshner E.A. Identifying the control of physically and perceptually evoked sway responses with coincident visual scene velocities and tilt of the base of support. Exp. Brain Res. 2010, 201:663-672.
39. Winter D. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement 1990, Wiley-Interscience, New York.