A functional-PCA approach for analyzing and reducing complex chemical mechanisms

Computers and Chemical Engineering

Volumn 30, Issue 6-7, 2006, Pages 1093-1101

  Gokulakrishnan, P ^a   Lawrence, A D ^b   McLellan, P J ^a   Grandmaison, E W ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Functional principal component analysis; Kinetics; Model reduction; Modelling; Pollution; Principal component analysis; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; GAS TURBINES; POLLUTION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REACTION KINETICS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; THERMAL EFFECTS;

FUNCTIONAL PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; KINETICS; MODEL REDUCTIONS; MODELING;

FLOW VISUALIZATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; FLOW VISUALIZATION; GAS TURBINES; POLLUTION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REACTION KINETICS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; THERMAL EFFECTS;

EID: 33646178963     PISSN: 00981354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2006.02.007     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Androulakis I.P. Kinetic mechanism reduction based on an integer programming approach. AIChE Journal 46 (2000) 361-371
2. Bender R., Blasenbrey T., and Maas U. Coupling of detailed and ILDM-reduced chemistry with turbulent mixing. Twenty-eighth symposium (international) on combustion. The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh (2000) 101-106
3. Brown N., Li G., and Koszykowski M.L. Mechanism reduction via principal component analysis. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics 29 (1997) 393-414
4. Chapman D.L., and Underhill L.K. The interaction of chlorine and hydrogen. Journal of the Chemical Society-Transactions 103 (1913) 496-508
5. Edwards K., Edgar T.F., and Manousiouthakis V.I. Reaction mechanism simplification using mixed-integer nonlinear programming. Computers and Chemical Engineering 24 (2000) 67-79
6. Frenklach M. Computer modeling of infinite reaction sequences: A chemical lumping. Chemical Engineering Science 40 (1985) 1843-1849
7. x, Multi-Jet, Natural-Gas Burners. PhD Thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont., Canada.
8. Golub, G. H., & van Loan, C. F. (1989). Matrix computations. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
9. Green W.H., Barton P.I., Bhattacharjee B., Matheu D.M., Schwer D.A., Song J., Sumathi R., Carstensen H.H., Dean A.M., and Grenda J.M. Computer construction of detailed chemical kinetic models for gas-phase reactors. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 40 (2001) 5362-5370
10. Hilbert R., Tap F., El-Rabii D., and Thevenin D. Impact of detailed chemistry and transport models on turbulent combustion simulations. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 30 (2004) 61-117
11. Hotelling H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principle components. Journal of Educational Psycology 24 (1933) 417-441
12. Lam S.H., and Goussis D.A. Understanding complex chemical kinetics with computational singular perturbation. Twenty-second symposium (international) on combustion. The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh (1988) 931-941
13. Lam S.H., and Goussis D.A. The CSP method for simplifying kinetics. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics 26 (1994) 461-486
14. Li G., and Rabitz H. A general analysis of exact lumping in chemical kinetics. Chemical Engineering Science 44 (1989) 1413-1430
15. Li G., and Rabitz H. A general analysis of approximate lumping in chemical kinetics. Chemical Engineering Science 45 (1990) 977-1002
16. Li G., and Rabitz H. A general analysis of exact nonlinear lumping in chemical kinetics. Chemical Engineering Science 49 (1994) 343-361
17. Lumley, J. L. (1967). The structure of inhomogeneous turbulence. In A. M. Yaglom, & V. I. Tatarski (Eds.), Atmospheric turbulence and wave propagation (pp. 166-178). Moscow: Nauka.
18. Maas U., and Pope S.B. Implementation of simplified chemical kinetics based on intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds. Twenty-fourth symposium (international) on combustion. The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh (1992) 103-112
19. Maas U., and Pope S.B. Simplifying chemical kinetics: Intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds in composition space. Combustion and Flame 88 (1992) 239-264
20. Michaelis L., and Menten M.L. Die Kinetic der Invertinwirkung. Biochemistry Zeitschrift 49 (1913) 333-369
21. Petzold L., and Zhu W. Model reduction for chemical kinetics: An optimization approach. AIChE Journal 45 (1999) 869-886
22. x. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society 9 (1998) 539-550
23. Ramsay J.O., and Silverman B.W. Functional data analysis (1997), Springer-Verlag, New York
24. Ranzi E., Dente M., Goldaniga A., Bozzano G., and Faravelli T. Lumping procedures in detailed kinetic modeling of gasification, pyrolysis, partial oxidation and combustion of hydrocarbon mixtures. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 27 (2001) 99-139
25. Tomlin A.S., Pilling M.J., Merkin J.H., Brindley J., Burgess N., and Gough A. Reduced mechanisms for propane pyrolysis. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 34 (1995) 3749-3760
26. Turányi T. Reduction of large reaction mechanisms. New Journal of chemistry 14 (1990) 795-803
27. Turányi T., Bérces T., and Vajda S. Reaction rate analysis of complex kinetic systems. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics 21 (1989) 83-99
28. Vajda S., and Turányi T. Principal component analysis for reducing the Edelson-Field-Noyes model of the Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction. Journal of Physical Chemistry 90 (1986) 1664-1670
29. Vajda S., Valko P., and Turányi T. Principal component analysis of kinetics models. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics 17 (1985) 55-81
30. 4/air combustion system. International Journal Of Energy Research 23 (1999) 1267-1276
31. Yetter R.A., Dryer F.L., and Rabitz H. Some interpretative aspects of elementary sensitivity gradients in combustion kinetics modelling. Combustion and Flame 59 (1985) 107-133