Dynamic intraoperative dosimetry for prostate brachytherapy using a nonisocentric C-arm

Brachytherapy

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 98-106

  Song, Danny Y ^a   Jain, Ameet K ^b   Zhang, Zhe ^c   Deguet, Anton ^d   Le, Yi ^a   Armour, Elwood ^a   Burdette, E Clif ^e   Fichtinger, Gabor ^f  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^e Acoustic MedSystems   (United States)

^f QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

C arm; Dynamic dosimetry; Intraoperative; Prostate brachytherapy; Real time dosimetry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRACHYTHERAPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DOSIMETRY; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRAOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE; REGISTRATION; STUDENT T TEST; TELECOMMUNICATION; ULTRASOUND;

AGED; BRACHYTHERAPY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RADIOMETRY; RADIOTHERAPY DOSAGE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 79951576957     PISSN: 15384721     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2010.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Potters L., Huang D., Calugaru E., et al. Importance of implant dosimetry for patients undergoing prostate brachytherapy. Urology 2003, 62:1073-1077.
2. Yamada Y., Potters L., Zaider M., et al. Impact of intraoperative edema during transperineal permanent prostate brachytherapy on computer-optimized and preimplant planning techniques. Am J Clin Oncol 2003, 26:e130-e135.
3. Tanaka O., Hayashi S., Matsuo M., et al. Effect of edema on postimplant dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy using CT/MRI fusion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007, 69:614-618.
4. Nag S., Ciezki J.P., Cormack R., et al. Intraoperative planning and evaluation of permanent prostate brachytherapy: Report of the American Brachytherapy Society. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001, 51:1422-1430.
5. Fuller D.B., Jin H. Computed tomography-ultrasound fusion brachytherapy: Description and evolution of the technique. Brachytherapy 2007, 6:272-279.
6. Westendorp H., Hoekstra C.J., van't Riet A., et al. Intraoperative adaptive brachytherapy of iodine-125 prostate implants guided by C-arm cone-beam computed tomography-based dosimetry. Brachytherapy 2007, 6:231-237.
7. Orio P.F., Tutar I.B., Narayanan S., et al. Intraoperative ultrasound-fluoroscopy fusion can enhance prostate brachytherapy quality. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007, 69:302-307.
8. Kaplan I.D., Meskell P., Oldenburg N.E., et al. Real-time computed tomography dosimetry during ultrasound-guided brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Brachytherapy 2006, 5:147-151.
9. Jain A.K., Mustafa T., Zhou Y., et al. FTRAC-A robust fluoroscope tracking fiducial. Med Phys 2005, 32:3185-3198.
10. Jain A., Fichtinger G. C-arm tracking and reconstruction without an external tracker. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2006, 9:494-502.
11. Jain A., Deguet A., Iordachita I., et al. Intra-operative 3D guidance in prostate brachytherapy using a non-isocentric C-arm. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2007, 10:9-17.
12. Jain A.K., Zhou Y., Mustufa T., et al. Matching and reconstruction of brachytherapy seeds using the Hungarian algorithm (MARSHAL). Med Phys 2005, 32:3475-3492.
13. Crook J.M., Potters L., Stock R.G., et al. Critical organ dosimetry in permanent seed prostate brachytherapy: Defining the organs at risk. Brachytherapy 2005, 4:186-194.
14. Lee W.R., Bae K., Lawton C.A., et al. A descriptive analysis of postimplant dosimetric parameters from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group P0019. Brachytherapy 2006, 5:239-243.
15. Zeger S.L., Liang K.Y., Albert P.S. Models for longitudinal data: A generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 1988, 44:1049-1060.
16. Liang K.Y., Zeger S.L. Regression analysis for correlated data. Annu Rev Public Health 1993, 14:43-68.
17. Obuchowski N.A. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale. Stat Med 2006, 25:481-493.
18. Obuchowski N.A. Estimating and comparing diagnostic tests' accuracy when the gold standard is not binary. Acad Radiol 2005, 12:1198-1204.
19. Stone N.N., Roy J., Hong S., et al. Prostate gland motion and deformation caused by needle placement during brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2002, 1:154-160.
20. Waterman F.M., Yue N., Corn B.W., et al. Edema associated with I-125 or Pd-103 prostate brachytherapy and its impact on post-implant dosimetry: An analysis based on serial CT acquisition. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998, 41:1069-1077.
21. Chen Z., Yue N., Wang X., et al. Dosimetric effects of edema in permanent prostate seed implants: A rigorous solution. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000, 47:1405-1419.
22. Dawson J.E., Wu T., Roy T., et al. Dose effects of seeds placement deviations from pre-planned positions in ultrasound guided prostate implants. Radiother Oncol 1994, 32:268-270.
23. Chauveinc L., Flam T., Solignac S., et al. Prostate cancer brachytherapy: Is real-time ultrasound-based dosimetry predictive of subsequent CT-based dose distribution calculation? A study of 450 patients by the Institut Curie/Hospital Cochin (Paris) Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004, 59:691-695.
24. Nag S., Shi P., Liu B., et al. Comparison of real-time intraoperative ultrasound-based dosimetry with postoperative computed tomography-based dosimetry for prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008, 70:311-317.
25. Bues M., Holupka E.J., Meskell P., et al. Effect of random seed placement error in permanent transperineal prostate seed implant. Radiother Oncol 2006, 79:70-74.
26. Potters L., Calugaru E., Jassal A., et al. Is there a role for postimplant dosimetry after real-time dynamic permanent prostate brachytherapy?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006, 65:1014-1019.
27. Zelefsky M.J., Yamada Y., Cohen G.N., et al. Intraoperative real-time planned conformal prostate brachytherapy: Post-implantation dosimetric outcome and clinical implications. Radiother Oncol 2007, 84:185-189.
28. Lee E.K., Zaider M. Intraoperative dynamic dose optimization in permanent prostate implants. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003, 56:854-861.
29. Leclerc G., Lavallee M.C., Roy R., et al. Prostatic edema in 125I permanent prostate implants: dynamical dosimetry taking volume changes into account. Med Phys 2006, 33:574-583.
30. Chen Z.J., Deng J., Roberts K., et al. On the need to compensate for edema-induced dose reductions in preplanned (131)Cs prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008, 70:303-310.
31. Liu X., Jain A.K., Fichtinger G. Prostate implant reconstruction with discrete tomography. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2007, 10:734-742.