Intraoperative adaptive brachytherapy of iodine-125 prostate implants guided by C-arm cone-beam computed tomography-based dosimetry

Brachytherapy

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 231-237

  Westendorp, Hendrik ^a   Hoekstra, Carel J ^a   van't Riet, Arie ^a   Minken, André W ^a   Immerzeel, Jos J ^a  

^a Radiotherapeutic Institute Stedendriehoek en Omstreken   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adaptive brachytherapy; Cone beam CT; Intraoperative dosimetry; Prostate; Registration; Transrectal ultrasound

Indexed keywords

IODINE 125;

ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; BRACHYTHERAPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSIMETRY; HUMAN; MALE; ONCOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE; PROSTATE CANCER; RADIATION DOSE; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

BRACHYTHERAPY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; IODINE RADIOISOTOPES; MALE; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RADIOTHERAPY DOSAGE; RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 35648940686     PISSN: 15384721     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2007.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Mueller A., Wallner K., Merrick G., et al. Modification of prostate implants based on postimplant treatment margin assessment. Med Phys 29 (2002) 2782-2787
2. Ash D., Al-Qaisieh B., Bottomley D., et al. The correlation between D90 and outcome for I-125 seed implant monotherapy for localised prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 79 (2006) 185-189
3. Stock R.G., Stone N.N., Tabert A., et al. A dose-response study for I-125 prostate implants. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 41 (1998) 101-108
4. Nag S., Bice W., DeWyngaert K., et al. The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for permanent prostate brachytherapy postimplant dosimetric analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46 (2000) 221-230
5. 125I reimplantation in patients with poor initial dosimetry after prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60 (2004) 40-50
6. Zelefsky M.J., and Zaider M. Low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: Preplanning vs. intraoperative planning-intraoperative planning is best. Brachytherapy 5 (2006) 143-144 [Discussion 146]
7. Han B.H., Wallner K., Merrick G., et al. Prostate brachytherapy seed identification on post-implant TRUS images. Med Phys 30 (2003) 898-900
8. Steggerda M., Schneider C., van Herk M., et al. The applicability of simultaneous TRUS-CT imaging for the evaluation of prostate seed implants. Med Phys 32 (2005) 2262-2270
9. Gong L., Cho P.S., Han B.H., et al. Ultrasonography and fluoroscopic fusion for prostate brachytherapy dosimetry. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54 (2002) 1322-1330
10. Todor D.A., Zaider M., Cohen G.N., et al. Intraoperative dynamic dosimetry for prostate implants. Phys Med Biol 48 (2003) 1153-1171
11. Su Y., Davis B.J., Herman M.G., et al. Prostate brachytherapy seed localization by analysis of multiple projections: Identifying and addressing the seed overlap problem. Med Phys 31 (2004) 1277-1287
12. Fuller D.B., Jin H., Koziol J.A., et al. CT-ultrasound fusion prostate brachytherapy: A dynamic dosimetry feedback and improvement method. A report of 54 consecutive cases. Brachytherapy 4 (2005) 207-216
13. Kaplan I.D., Meskell P., Oldenburg N.E., et al. Real-time computed tomography dosimetry during ultrasound-guided brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Brachytherapy 5 (2006) 147-151
14. Reed D.R., Wallner K.E., Narayanan S., et al. Intraoperative fluoroscopic dose assessment in prostate brachytherapy patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63 (2005) 301-307
15. Holm H.H., Juul N., Pedersen J.F., et al. Transperineal 125iodine seed implantation in prostatic cancer guided by transrectal ultrasonography. J Urol 130 (1983) 283-286
16. Nag S., Beyer D., Friedland J., et al. American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommendations for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44 (1999) 789-799
17. Taussky D., Austen L., Toi A., et al. Sequential evaluation of prostate edema after permanent seed prostate brachytherapy using CT-MRI fusion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62 (2005) 974-980
18. Prestidge B.R., Bice W.S., Kiefer E.J., et al. Timing of computed tomography-based postimplant assessment following permanent transperineal prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 40 (1998) 1111-1115
19. Waterman F.M., Yue N., Corn B.W., et al. Edema associated with I-125 or Pd-103 prostate brachytherapy and its impact on post-implant dosimetry: An analysis based on serial CT acquisition. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 41 (1998) 1069-1077
20. 125I seeds in postimplant TRUS images for prostate brachytherapy dosimetry. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62 (2005) 912-919
21. Chauveinc L., Flam T., Solignac S., et al. Prostate cancer brachytherapy: Is real-time ultrasound-based dosimetry predictive of subsequent CT-based dose distribution calculation? A study of 450 patients by the Institut Curie/Hospital Cochin (Paris) Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59 (2004) 691-695
22. Al-Qaisieh B., Ash D., Bottomley D.M., et al. Impact of prostate volume evaluation by different observers on CT-based post-implant dosimetry. Radiother Oncol 62 (2002) 267-273
23. Smith W.L., Lewis C., Bauman G., et al. Prostate volume contouring: A 3D analysis of segmentation using 3DTRUS, CT, MR. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67 (2007) 1238-1247
24. Salembier C., Lavagnini P., Nickers P., et al. Tumour and target volumes in permanent prostate brachytherapy: A supplement to the ESTRO/EAU/EORTC recommendations on prostate brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 83 (2007) 3-10
25. Westendorp R., van't Riet A., Bouwman R., et al. Assessment of prostate volume determining parameters in I-125 therapy. Radiother Oncol 71 (2004) S4