Erratum: Induction and pruning of classification rules for prediction of microseismic hazards in coal mines (Experts Systems with Applications (2011) 38:6 (6748-6758) DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.059);Induction and pruning of classification rules for prediction of microseismic hazards in coal mines

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 6748-6758

  Sikora, Marek ^a,b  

^a SILESIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b Institute of Innovative Technologies EMAG   (Poland)

Author keywords

Classification; Microseismic hazard prediction; Rules induction; Rules quality measures

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATA MINING; DECISION TREES; FUZZY NEURAL NETWORKS; FUZZY SYSTEMS; HAZARDS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; QUALITY CONTROL; SEISMOLOGY; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

CLASSIFICATION ABILITY; CLASSIFICATION RULES; CLASSIFIER'S QUALITY; DECISION TREE INDUCTION; HAZARD PREDICTION; QUALITY MEASURES; RULES INDUCTION; SPECIAL ALGORITHMS;

COAL MINES;

EID: 79951576546     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.04.017     Document Type: Erratum

References (40)

1. A. An, and N. Cercone Rule quality measures for rule induction systems - Description and evaluation Computational Intelligence 17 2001 409 424 (Pubitemid 32934013)
2. R. Bairagi, and C.M. Suchindran An estimation of the cutoff point maximizing sum of sensitivity and specificity Sankhya, Series B, Indian Journal of Statistics 51 1989 263 269
3. B. Bodri A neural-network model for earthquake occurrence Journal of Geodynamics 32 3 2001 289 310 (Pubitemid 33017312)
4. I. Bruha Quality of decision rules: Definitions and classification schemes for multiple rules G. Nakhaeizadeh, C.C. Taylor, Machine learning and statistics, the interface 1997 John Wiley and Sons
5. Central Mining Institute. (2007). Rules of application of the comprehensive and detailed rockburst hazard assessment methods in hard-coal mines. Instruction No. 20, Katowice Poland (in Polish).
6. N. Chawla, K. Bowyer, L. Hall, and W. Kegelmeyer SMOTE synthetics minority over-sampling technique Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 16 2002 341 378
7. A. Cianciara, and B. Cianciara The meaning of seismoacoustic emission for estimation of time of the mining tremors occurrence Archives of Mining Sciences 51 4 2006 563 575
8. P. Clark, and T. Niblett The CN2 induction algorithm Machine Learning 3 1989 261 283
9. J. Cohen A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales Educational and Psych. Meas. 22 1960 37 46
10. W. Duch, R. Adamczak, and K. Grabczewski A new methodology of extraction, optimization and application of cris and fuzzy logical rules IEEE Transaction on Neural Networks 11 2 2000 1 31
11. W. Duch, and K. Grudzinski Meta-learning via search combined with parameter optimization Intelligent information systems Advances in soft computing 2002 Physica Verlag (Springer) 13 22
12. T. Fawcett PRIE a system for generation rulelist to maximize ROC performance Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 17 2008 207 224
13. J. Furnkranz Separate-and-conquer rule learning Artificial Intelligence Review 13 1999 3 54
14. J. Furnkranz, and P.A. Flach ROC 'n' rule learning - Towards a better understanding of covering algorithms Machine Learning 58 2005 39 77 (Pubitemid 40356739)
15. J. Furnkranz, and G. Widmer Incremental reduced error pruning Proceedings of the 11th international conference on machine learning 1994 Morgan Kaufman New Brunswick 70 77
16. Gale, W. J.; Heasley, K. A.; Iannacchione, A. T.; Swanson, P. L.; Hatherly, P.; King, A. (2001). Rock damage characterization from microseismic monitoring. In Proceedings of 38th US symposium of rock mechanics, Washington, DC (pp. 1313-1320).
17. S. Gibowicz, and S. Lasocki Seismicity induced by mining: 10 years later Advances in geophysics Vol. 44 2001 Academic Press New York 1 164
18. Grzymala-Busse, J.; Wang, C. P. (1996). Classification methods in rule induction. Intelligent information systems. In Proceedings of the workshop held in Deblin, Poland, June 2-5 (pp. 120-126).
19. Grzymala-Busse, J.; Goodwin, W.; Zheng, X. (2000). An approach to imbalanced data sets based on changing rule strength. In AAAI workshop at the 17th conference on AI (AAAI-2000), Austin (pp. 69-74).
20. J. Grzymala-Busse, J. Stefanowski, and S. Wilk A comparison of two approaches to data mining from imbalanced data Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 16 2005 565 573 (Pubitemid 41605674)
21. J. Kabiesz Effect of the form of data on the quality of mine tremors hazard forecasting using neural networks Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 24 5 2005 1131 1147
22. Konopko, W. (1994). Experimental basis for qualifying mining excavations in hard coal mines according to the rockbust hazard. Central Mining Institute, Katowice Poland. Research Report 795.
23. J. Kornowski Linear prediction of aggregated seismic and seismoacoustic energy emitted from a mining longwall Acta Montana Series A 22 129 2003 str.4-14
24. S. Lasocki Probabilistic analysis of seismic hazard posed by mining induced events Proceedings of sixth international symposium on rockburst and seismicity in mines 2005 Australian Centre for Geomechanics Western Australia 151 156
25. A. Leśniak, and Z. Isakow Space-time clustering of seismic events and hazard assessment in the Zabrze-Bielszowice coal mine, Poland International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 46 2009 918 928
26. Michalski, R. S.; Mozetic, I.; Hong, J.; Lavrac, N. (1986). The AQ15 inductive learning system: An overview and experiments. ISG Report No. 20. Department of Computer Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
27. F. Provost, T. Fawcett, and R. Kohavi The case against accuracy estimation for comparing induction algorithms Proceedings of ICML-98 1998 Morgan Kaufman San Francisco, CA 445 453
28. J.R. Quinlan C4.5: Programs for machine learning 1993 Morgan Kaufman San Mateo
29. V. Rudajev, and R. Číž Estimation of mining tremor occurrence by using neural networks Pure and Applied Geophysics 154 1 1999 57 72 (Pubitemid 29280378)
30. I.U. Sikder, and T. Munakada Application of rough set and decision tree for characterization of premonitory factors of low seismic activity Expert Systems with Applications 36 2009 102 110
31. Sikora, M. (2002). Generalization and evaluation of decision rules for quality improvement of decision classes descriptions. Doctoral Thesis. Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice Poland.
32. M. Sikora Rule quality measures in creation and reduction of data rules models Lecture notes in artificial intelligence Vol. 4259 2006 Springer-Verlag pp. 716-725
33. Sikora, M. (2010). Decision rules-based data models using TRS and NetTRS - methods and algorithms. In Transactions on rough sets XI. Lecture notes in computer sciences (Vol. 5946, pp. 130-160).
34. M. Sikora, and P. Mazik Towards the better assessment of a seismic hazard - The Hestia and Hestia map systems Mechanization and Automation of Mining 3 457 2009 5 12
35. M. Sikora, and B. Sikora Application of machine learning for prediction a methane concentration in a coal-mine Archives of Mining Sciences 51 4 2006 475 492
36. Stefanowski, J. (1998). Rough set based rule induction techniques for classification problems. In Proceedings of the sixth European congress of intelligent techniques and soft computing, Achen September 7-10 (Vol. 1, pp. 107-119).
37. Y. Sun, M.S. Kamel, A. Wong, and Y. Wang Cost-sensitive boosting for classification of imbalanced data Pattern Recognition 40 2007 3358 3378 (Pubitemid 47223287)
38. G. van Aswegen Routine seismic hazard assessment in some South African mines Proceedings of sixth international symposium on rockburst and seismicity in mines 2005 Australian Centre for Geomechanics Western Australia 437 444
39. C.V. van Rijsbergen Information retrieval 2nd ed. 1979 Butterworth Boston, London
40. Y.Y. Yao Information-theoretic measures for knowledge discovery and data mining Karmeshu Entropy measures, maximum entropy and emerging applications 2003 Springer Berlin 115 136