The effects of timing of intrauterine insemination in relation to ovulation and the number of inseminations on cycle pregnancy rate in common infertility etiologies

Human Reproduction

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 576-583

  Ghanem, Mohamad E ^a   Bakre, Nagwa I ^b   Emam, Mohamad A ^a   Al Boghdady, Laila A ^a   Helal, Adel S ^a   Elmetwally, Abdel Gawad ^a   Hassan, Mohamad ^b   Albahlol, Ibrahim A ^b   Elzayat, Mostafa M ^a  

^a Mansoura Integrated Fertility Center   (Egypt)

^b MANSOURA UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

infertility; intrauterine insemination; ovarian stimulation

Indexed keywords

CLOMIFENE CITRATE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYCLE PREGNANCY RATE; FEMALE; HORMONAL THERAPY; HUMAN; INFERTILITY; INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OVARY FOLLICLE; OVULATION; PREGNANCY RATE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TRANSVAGINAL ECHOGRAPHY;

EID: 79951560603     PISSN: 02681161     EISSN: 14602350     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq362     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abdelkader AM, Yeh J. The potential use of intrauterine insemination as a basic option for infertility: a review for technology-limited medical settings. Obstet Gynecol Int 2009;2009:584837.
2. Ahinko-Hakamaa1 K, Huhtala H, TinKanen H. Success in intrauterine insemination: the role of etiology. Acta Obstet Gynecol 2007; 86:855-860. (Pubitemid 47035826)
3. Alborzi S, Motazedian S, Parsanezhad ME, Jannati S. Comparison of the effectiveness of single intrauterine insemination (IUI) versus double IUI per cycle in infertile patients. Fertil Steril 2003;80:595-599. (Pubitemid 37102872)
4. Bagis T, Haydardedeoglu B, Kilicdag EB, Cok T, Simsek E, Parlakgumus AH. Single versus double intrauterine insemination in multi-follicular ovarian hyperstimulation cycles: a randomized trial. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1684-1690.
5. Cantineau AEP, Heineman MJ, Cohlen BJ. Single versus double intrauterine insemination (IUI) in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003. Art. No.: CD003854, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003854
6. Cantineau AEP, Janssen MJ, Cohlen BJ. Synchronised approach for intrauterine insemination in subfertile couples. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010. Art. No.: CD006942. DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD006942.pub2
7. Cohlen BJ. Intrauterine insemination: facts and fairy-tales. Int Congr Ser 2005;1279:50-57. (Pubitemid 43715326)
8. Cooper TG, Noonan E, Eckardstein SV, Auger J, Gordon Baker HW, Behre HM, Haugen TB, Kruger T, Wang C, Mbizvo MT et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update 2009;00:1-15.
9. Daya S. Pitfalls in the design and analysis of efficacy trials in Subfertility. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1005-1009. (Pubitemid 36592042)
10. Duran HE, Morhedi M, Kruger T, Oehinger S. Intrauterine insemination: a systemic review on determinants of success. Hum Reprod Update 2002; 8:373.
11. Edwards RG, Brody SA. Principles and Practice of Assisted Human Reproduction, 1st edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1995.
12. Gauci MM, Kruger TF, Coetzee1 K, Smith K, van der Merwe JP, Lombard CJ. Stepwise regression analysis to study male and female factors impacting on pregnancy rate in an intrauterine insemination programme. Andrologia 2001;33:135-141. (Pubitemid 33757140)
13. Gezginç K, Görkemli H, Çelik Ç, Karatayli R, Çiçek MN, Çolakoglu MC. Comparison of single versus double intrauterine insemination. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2008;47:57-61. (Pubitemid 351613008)
14. Ghanem ME, Sadek EM, Helal AS, Al-Boghdady LA, Emam ME, Bakre NI. Effect of stimulation protocol on the risk of luteinized unruptured follicle (LUF) in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS): does LUF affect luteal phase profile? Fertil Steril 2009;92:S99.
15. Guven S, Gunalp GS, Tekin Y. Factors influencing pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination cycles. J Reprod Med 2008;53:257-265. (Pubitemid 351644540)
16. Guzick DS. For now, one well-timed intrauterine insemination is the way to go. Fertil Steril 2004;82:30-31. (Pubitemid 38968771)
17. Hauser R, Yogev L, Botchan A, Lessing JB, Paz G, Yavetz H. Intrauterine insemination in male factor subfertility: signifcance of sperm motility and morphology assessed by strict criteria. Andrologia 2001; 33:13-17. (Pubitemid 32165197)
18. Kucuk T. Intrauterine insemination: is the timing correct? J Assist Reprod Genet 2008;8:427-430.
19. Luciano AA, Peluso J, Koch EI, Maier D, Kuslis S, Davison E. Temporal relationship and reliability of the clinical, hormonal, and ultrasonographic indices of ovulation in infertile women. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:412-416. (Pubitemid 20062281)
20. Ombelet W, Deblaere K, Bosmans E, Cox A, Jacobs P, Janssen M, Nijs M. Semen quality and intrauterine insemination. Reprod Biomed Online 2003; 7:485-492. (Pubitemid 37441708)
21. Osuna C, Matorras R, Pijoan JI, Rodŕguez-Escudero FJ. One versus two inseminations per cycle in intrauterine insemination with sperm from patients' husbands: a systematic review of the literature. Fertil Steril 2004;82:17-24. (Pubitemid 38968768)
22. Pearlstone AC, Surrey ES. The temporal relation between the urine LH surge and sonographic evidence of ovulation: determinants and clinical significance. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:184-188. (Pubitemid 24043286)
23. Prietal G, van der Ven, Krebs D. Artificial insemination: noninvasive management of subfertile couples. In Rabe T, Diedrich K, Strowitzki (eds). Manual on Assisted Reproduction, 2nd edn. Berlin: Springer, 2000, P601.
24. Qublan H, Amarin Z, Nawasreh M, Diab F, Malkawi S, Al-Ahmad N, Balawneh M. Luteinized unruptured follicle syndrome: incidence and recurrence rate in infertile women with unexplained infertility undergoing intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod 2006;21:2110-2113. (Pubitemid 44288090)
25. Ragni G, Somigliana E, Vegetti W. Timing of intrauterine insemination: where are we are? Fertil Steril 2004;82:25-26. (Pubitemid 38968769)
26. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod Update 2009;15:265-277.
27. The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group revised (2003-2004). Consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome PCOS. Hum Reprod 2004;19:41-47.
28. Tournaye H. Evidence-based management of male subfertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2006;18:253-259. (Pubitemid 43864723)
29. van Rumste MME, Custers IM, van der Veen F, van Wely M, Evers JLH, Mol BWJ. The influence of the number of follicles on pregnancy rates in intrauterine insemination with ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2008;14:563-570.
30. Van Voorhis BJ, Barnett M, Sparks AET, Syrop CH, Rosenthal G, Dawson J. Effect of the total motile sperm count on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2001;75:661.
31. Wainer R, Albert M, Dorion A, Bailly M, Berger M, Lombroso R, Gombault M, Selva J. Influence of the number of motile spermatozoa inseminated and of their morphology on the success of intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2060-2065. (Pubitemid 39236473)
32. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction, 4th edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.