Development and use of a novel method for in line characterisation of fouling layers electrokinetic properties and for fouling monitoring

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 370, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 45-57

  Teychene, Benoit ^a,b,c   Loulergue, Patrick ^a,b,c   Guigui, Christelle ^a,b,c   Cabassud, Corinne ^a,b,c  

^a INSA   (France)

^b UMR792 INGÉNIERIE DES SYSTÈMES BIOLOGIQUES ET DES PROCÉDÉS   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Cake layer characterisation; Electrokinetic phenomena; Fouling monitoring; Microfiltration; Particle filtration; Streaming potential

Indexed keywords

CHARACTERISATION; ELECTROKINETIC PHENOMENA; FOULING MONITORING; PARTICLE FILTRATION; STREAMING POTENTIAL;

DIELECTRIC MATERIALS; ELECTRODYNAMICS; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; ELECTROSTATICS; MASS TRANSFER; MEMBRANE FOULING; MEMBRANES; MONITORING; SUSPENSIONS (FLUIDS); VALUE ENGINEERING; ZETA POTENTIAL;

MICROFILTRATION;

ARTICLE; BIOFOULING; FOULING CONTROL; MEMBRANE; MICROEMULSION ELECTROKINETIC CHROMATOGRAPHY; MICROFILTRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATIC ELECTRICITY;

EID: 79951556255     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.12.014     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Causserand C., Kara Y., Aimar P. Protein fractionation using selective adsorption on clay surface before filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 186:165-181.
2. Teixeira M.R., Rosa M.J. pH adjustment for seasonal control of UF fouling by natural waters. Desalination 2003, 151:165-175.
3. Le-Clech P., Chen V., Fane T.A.G. Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:17-53.
4. Kim K.J., Fane A.G., Nystrom M., Pihlajamaki A., Bowen W.R., Mukhtar H. Evaluation of electroosmosis and streaming potential for measurement of electric charges of polymeric membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 116:149-159.
5. Szymczyk A., Pierre A., Reggiani J.C., Pagetti J. Characterisation of the electrokinetic properties of plane inorganic membranes using streaming potential measurements. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 134:59-66.
6. Fievet P., Sbai M., Szymczyk A., Vidonne A. Determining the zeta-potential of plane membranes from tangential streaming potential measurements: effect of the membrane body conductance. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 226:227-236.
7. Egueh A.-N.D., Lakard B., Fievet P., Lakard S., Buron C. Charge properties of membranes modified by multilayer polyelectrolyte adsorption. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 344:221-227.
8. Causserand C., Nystrom M., Aimar P. Study of streaming potentials of clean and fouled ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1994, 88:211-222.
9. Nystrom M., Pihlajamaki A., Ehsani N. Characterization of ultrafiltration membranes by simultaneous streaming potential and flux measurements. J. Membr. Sci. 1994, 87:245-256.
10. Benavente J., Jonsson G. Effect of adsorbed protein on the hydraulic permeability, membrane and streaming potential values measured across a microporous membrane. Colloids Surf. A 1998, 138:255-264.
11. de Lara R., Benavente J. Use of hydrodynamic and electrical measurements to determine protein fouling mechanisms for microfiltration membranes with different structures and materials. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 66(3):517-524.
12. Le Bolay N., Ricard A. Streaming potential in membrane processes: microfiltration of egg proteins. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1995, 170:154-160.
13. Sung J.H., Chun M.-S., Choi H.J. On the behavior of electrokinetic streaming potential during protein filtration with fully and partially retentive nanopores. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 264:195-202.
14. Soffer Y., Gilron J., Adin A. Streaming potential and SEM-EDX study of UF membranes fouled by colloidal iron. Desalination 2002, 146:115-121.
15. Chun M.S., Cho H.I., Song I.K. Electrokinetic behavior of membrane zeta potential during the filtration of colloidal suspensions. Desalination 2002, 148:363-368.
16. Chun M.S., Park W.C. Time evolution of electrokinetic flow-induced streaming potential and flux in dead-end and cross-flow filtration of colloids through nanopores. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 243:417-424.
17. Huisman I.H., Pradanos P., Hernandez A. Electrokinetic characterisation of ultrafiltration membranes by streaming potential, electroviscous effect, and salt retention. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 178:55-64.
18. Thekkedath A., Naceur W.M., Kecili K., Sbai M., Elana A., Auret L., Suty H., et al. Macroscopic and microscopic characterizations of a cellulosic ultrafiltration (UF) membrane fouled by a humic acid cake deposit: first step for intensification of reverse osmosis (RO) pre-treatments. C. R. Chim. 2007, 10(9):803-812.
19. Jermann D., Pronk W., Meylan S., Boller M. Interplay of different NOM fouling mechanisms during ultrafiltration for drinking water production. Water Res. 2007, 41(8):1713-1722.
20. H. Suty, H. Habarou, M. Pontie, Electrokinetic Method for Determining the Electrostatic Charge State of a Porous Membrane during Filtering and the use thereof, Patent no 20090066316 (2009).
21. Pontie M., Durand-Bourlier L., Lemordant D., Laine J.M. Control fouling and cleaning procedures of UF membranes by a streaming potential method. Sep. Purif. Techol. 1998, 14:1-11.
22. Nystrom M., Zhu H. Characterization of cleaning results using combined flux and streaming potential methods. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 131:195-205.
23. Lawrence N.D., Perera J.M., Iyer M., Hickey M.W., Stevens G.W. The use of streaming potential measurements to study the fouling and cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 48:106-112.
24. Kim K.-J., Sun P., Chen V., Wiley D.E., Fane A.G. The cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes fouled by protein. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 80:241-249.
25. Zeng J., Ye H., Liu H., Xie H. Characterization of a hollow-fiber ultrafiltration membrane and control of cleaning procedures by a streaming potential method. Desalination 2006, 195:226-234.
26. Szymczyk A., Fievet P., Mullet M., Reggiani J.C., Pagetti J. Study of electrokinetic properties of plate ceramic membranes by electroosmosis and streaming potential. Desalination 1998, 119(1-3):309-313.
27. Chellam S., Wiesner M.R. Evaluation of crossflow filtration models based on shear-induced diffusion and particle adhesion: complications induced by feed suspension polydispersivity. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 138(1):83-97.
28. Foley G. A review of factors affecting filter cake properties in dead-end microfiltration of microbial suspensions. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 274(1-2):38-46.
29. Opong W.S., Zydney A.L. Hydraulic permeability of protein layers deposited during ultrafiltration. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1991, 142:41-60.
30. Kelly S.T., Opong W.S., Zydney A.L. The influence of protein aggregates on the fouling of microfiltration membranes during stirred cell filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 80:175-187.
31. Szymczyk A., Labbez C., Fievet P., Aoubiza B., Simon C. Streaming potential through multilayer membranes. AIChE J. 2001, 47:2349-2358.
32. Yaroshchuk A.E., Boiko Y.P., Makovetskiy A.L. Filtration potential across membranes containing selective layers. Langmuir 2002, 18(13):5154.
33. Fievet P., Sbai M., Szymczyk A. Analysis of the pressure-induced potential arising across selective multilayer membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 264:1-12.
34. Bockris J.O'M., Reddy A.K.N. Modern Electrochemistry. Ionics 1970, vol. 1. Plenum Press, p. 824.
35. Tanny G., Hoffer E., Kedem O. Streaming potential during hyperfiltration. Exp. Suppl. 1971, 18:619.
36. Szymczyk A., Aoubiza B., Fievet P., Pagetti J. Electrokinetic phenomena in homogeneous cylindrical pores. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1999, 216:285-296.
37. Chellam S., Xu W. Blocking laws analysis of dead-end constant flux microfiltration of compressible cakes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 301:248-257.
38. Smoluchowski M. Krak. Anz 1903, p. 182.
39. Jons S., Ries P., McDonald C.J. Porous latex composite membranes: fabrication and properties. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 155:79-99.
40. Wang Z., Zhao Y., Ye N., Wang J., Zhao Z., Wang S. Evaluation of four measurement operation modes of streaming potential for microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes. Chinese J. Chem. Eng. 2006, 14:456-463.