A set-theoretic analysis of the components of family involvement in publicly listed and major unlisted firms

Journal of Family Business Strategy

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 15-25

  Garcia Castro, Roberto ^a   Casasola, M José ^b  

^a IESE BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Family firms; Family involvement; Governance; Set theoretic analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951554663     PISSN: 18778585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2011.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anderson R.C., Reeb D.M. Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance 2003, 58:1301-1327.
2. Astrachan J.H., Shanker M.C. Family businesses' contribution to the U.S. economy: A closer look. Family Business Review 2003, 16(3):211-219.
3. Berrone P., Cruz C., Gomez-Mejia L.R., Larraza-Kintana M. Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less?. Administrative Science Quarterly 2010, 55(1):82-113.
4. Chua J.H., Chrisman J.J., Sharma P. Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 1999, 23(4):19-39.
5. Davis J., Tagiuri R. The influence of life-stage on father-son work relationship in family companies. Family Business Review 1989, 2(1):47-74.
6. Fernández Z., Nieto M.J. Internationalization strategy of small and medium-sized family business: Some influential factors. Family Business Review 2005, 18(1):77-89.
7. Fiss P.C. A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review 2007, 32:1180-1198.
8. Fiss, P. C. Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research, Academy of Management Journal, in press.
9. Gersick K.E., Davis J.A., Hampton M.M., Lansberg I. Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business 1997, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
10. Grekhamer T., Misangyi V.F., Elms H., Lacey R. Using qualitative comparative analysis in strategic management research: An examination of combinations of industry, corporate and business unit effects. Organizational Research Methods 2008, 11(4):695-726.
11. Hamadi M. Ownership concentration, family control and performance of firms. European Management Review 2010, 7(2):116-131.
12. Ifera Quality research guidelines. Family Business Review 2003, 16(2):109-111.
13. Jaskiewicz P., Gonzalez V.M., Menendez S., Schiereck D. Long run IPO performance analysis of German and Spanish family-owned businesses. Family Business Review 2005, 18:179-202.
14. Klein S.B., Astrachan J.H., Smyrnios K.X. The F-PEC scale of family influence: Construction, validation, and further implication for theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2005, 29:321-339.
15. Kogut B., Ragin C.C. Exploring complexity when diversity is limited: Institutional complementarity in theories of rule of law and national systems revisited. European Management Review 2006, 3:44-59.
16. Kogut B., MacDuffie J.P., Ragin C.C. Prototypes and strategy: Assigning causal credit using fuzzy sets. European Management Review 2004, 1:114-131.
17. Lansberg I. The succession conspiracy. Family Business Review 1988, 1(2):119-143.
18. Lansberg I.S., Perrow E.I., Rogolsky S. Family business as an emerging field. Family Business Review 1988, 1(1):1-8.
19. Lee J. Family firm performance: Further evidence. Family Business Review 2006, 19:103-115.
20. Litz R.A. The family business: Toward definitional clarity. Family Business Review 1995, 8(2):71-81.
21. Miller D., Le Breton-Miller I. Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses 2005, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
22. Miller D., Le Breton-Miller I., Lester R.H., Cannella A.A. Are family firms really superior performers?. Journal of Corporate Finance 2007, 13(5):829-858.
23. Neubauer F., Lank A.G. The family business: Its governance for sustainability 1998, Macmillan, London.
24. Nieto, M.J., Fernández, Z., Casasola, M.J., & Usero, B. (2009). Impacto de la implicación familiar y de otros accionistas de referencia en la creación de valor. Revista de Estudios Empresariales, Segunda época, (2).
25. Pajunen K. Institutions and inflows of foreign direct investment: A fuzzy set analysis. Journal of International Business Studies 2008, 39(4):652-669.
26. Ragin C.C. Fuzzy sets social science 2000, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
27. Ragin C.C. Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond 2008, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
28. Ragin C.C., Fiss P.C. Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: An empirical demonstration. Redesigning social inquiry: Set relations in social research 2008, 190-212. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. C.C. Ragin (Ed.).
29. Rutherford M.W., Kuratko D.F., Holt D.T. Examining the link between " familiness" and performance: Can the F-PEC untangle the family business theory jungle?. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2008, 32(6):1089-1109.
30. Schneider, M., Schulze-Bentrop, C., & Paunescu, M. Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: A fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance. Journal of International Business Studies, in press.
31. Shanker M.C., Astrachan J.H. Myths and realities: Family businesses' contribution to the US economy - A framework for assessing family business statistics. Family Business Review 1996, 9:107-123.
32. Sharma P. An overview of the field of family business studies: current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review 2004, 17(1):1-36.
33. Sharma, P. (2009). Stakeholder mapping technique: Toward the development of a family firm typology. Working paper. Laurier School of Business & Economics.
34. Sharma P., Nordqvist M. A typology for capturing the heterogeneity of family firms. Academy of Management Proceedings 2007.
35. Smith B.F., Amoako-Adu B. Management succession and financial performance of family controlled firms. Journal of Corporate Finance 1999, 5:341-368.
36. Tagiuri R., Davis J. Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review 1996, 9(2):199-207.
37. Villalonga B., Amit R. How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value?. Journal of Financial Economics 2006, 80:385-417.
38. Weber M. Objective possibility and adequate causation in historical explanation. The methodology of the social sciences 1949, 164-188. Free Press, New York. E.A. Shils, H.A. Finch (Eds.).
39. Westhead P., Cowling M. Family firm research: The need for a methodological rethink. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 1998, 23(1):31-56.
40. Zellweger T.M., Eddleston K.A., Kellermanns F.W. Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity. Journal of Family Business Strategy 2010, 1(1):54-63.