Interpersonal communication motives in everyday interactions

Communication Quarterly

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 93-109

  Step, Mary M ^a   Finucane, Margaret O ^b  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951543598     PISSN: 01463373     EISSN: 17464102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01463370209385648     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anderson, C. M., Motives in the small group context. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Communication Association. Seattle, WA. November.
2. Barbato, C. A., Elders’ uses of interpersonal communication. Paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Association. Denver, CO. October.
3. Barbato, C. A., Perse, E. M., and Graham, E. E., Communicating in the family: An examination of interpersonal communication motives and family communication patterns. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Communication Association. Seattle, WA. November.
4. Berscheid, D., 1985. “ Interpersonal attraction ”. In Handbook of social psychology, Edited by: Lindzey, G., and Aronson, E., 431-484. NY: Random House.
5. Biggars, T., and Masterson, J.T., 1983. “ Emotion‐eliciting qualities of interpersonal situations as the basis for typology ”. University of Miami. Unpublished manuscript
6. Byrne, D., 1961. Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 62(3): 713-715.
7. Byrne, D., 1992. The transition from controlled laboratory experimentation to less controlled settings: Surprise! Additional variables are operative. Communication Monographs, 59: 190-198.
8. Cody, M. J., and McLaughlin, M. L., 1980. Perception of compliance‐gaining situations: A dimensional analysis. Communication Monographs, 47: 132-148.
9. Cody, M. J., Woelfel, M. L., and Jordan, W. J., 1983. Dimensions of compliance‐gaining situations. Human Communication Research, 9: 99-113.
10. Conway, J. C., and Rubin, A. M., 1991. Psychological predictors of television‐viewing motivation. Communication Research, 18: 443-463.
11. Dillard, J. P., 1998. “ The role of affect in communication, biology, and social relationships ”. In Handbook of communication and emotion, Edited by: Anderson, P. A., and Guerrero, L. K., xvii-xxxii. San Diego: Academic Press.
12. Duck, S., 1998. Human relationships., (3rd Ed), London: Sage.
13. Duck, S., and Barnes, M. K., 1992. Disagreeing about agreement: Reconciling differences about similarity. Communication Monographs, 59: 199-208.
14. Finn, S., and Gorr, M. B., 1988. Social isolation and social support as correlates of television‐viewing motivations. Communication Research, 15: 135-158.
15. Giles, H., and Wiemann, J. M., 1987. “ Language, social comparison, and power ”. In Handbook of communication science, Edited by: Berger, C. R., and Chaffee, S. H., 350-384. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16. Goldsmith, D. J., and Baxter, L. A., 1996. Constituting relationships in talk: A taxonomy of speech events in social and personal relationships. Human Communication Research, 23: 87-114.
17. Graham, E. E., 1994. “ Interpersonal communication motives scale ”. In Communication research measures: A sourcebook, Edited by: Rubin, R. B., Palmgreen, P., and Sypher, H., 211-216. NY: Guilford.
18. Graham, E. E., 1997. Turning points and commitment in post‐divorce relationships. Communication Monographs, 64: 350-368.
19. Greenberg, B.S., 1974. “ Gratifications of television viewing and their correlates for British children ”. In The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research, Edited by: Blumer, J.G., and Katz, E., 71-92. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20. Gudykunst, W. B., and Shapiro, R. B., 1996. Communication in everyday interpersonal and inter‐group encounters. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20: 19-45.
21. Hays, R. B., 1984. The development and maintenance of friendship. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 1: 75-98.
22. Hays, R. B., 1989. The day‐to‐day functioning of close versus casual friendships. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 6: 21-37.
23. Honeycutt, J. M., and Wiemann, J. M., 1999. Analysis of functions of talk and reports of imagined interactions (IIs) during engagement and marriage. Human Communication Research, 25: 399-419.
24. Lambert, Z. V., and Durand, R. M., 1975. Some precautions using canonical analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 12: 468-475.
25. Lemish, D., 1985. Soap opera viewing in college: A naturalistic inquiry. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 29: 275-293.
26. Levine, M.S., 1977. Canonical analysis and factor comparison., Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27. Martin, M. M., Myers, S. A., and Mottet, T. P., 1999. Student motives for communicating with their instructors. Communication Education, 48: 155-164.
28. Miller, L. C., Cody, M. J., and McLaughlin, M. L., 1994. “ Situations and goals as fundamental constructs in interpersonal communication research ”. In Handbook of interpersonal communication, (2nd Ed.), Edited by: Knapp, M. L, and Miller, G. R., 162-198. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., and Tannenbaum, P. H., 1957. The measurement of meaning., Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
30. Perse, E. M., 1990. Involvement with local television news: Cognitive and emotional dimensions. Human Communication Research, 16: 556-581.
31. Perse, E. M., Understanding the appeal of interactive computer‐based games. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association. Acapulco. May.
32. Perse, E. M., and Courtright, J. A., 1993. Normative images of communication media: Mass and interpersonal channels in the new media environment. Human Communication Research, 19: 485-503.
33. Rubin, A. M., 1984. Ritualized and instrumental television viewing. Journal of Communication, 34(3): 67-77.
34. Rubin, A. M., 1993. The effect of locus of control on communication motivation, anxiety, and satisfaction. Communication Quarterly, 41: 161-171.
35. Rubin, A. M., Significance of Communication Motivation Research. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Communication Association. Seattle, WA. November.
36. Rubin, A. M., and Perse, E. M., 1987. Audience activity and television news gratifications. Human Communication Research, 8: 228-244.
37. Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M., and Powell, R. A., 1985. Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12: 155-180.
38. Rubin, A. M., and Step, M. M., 2000. Impact of motivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction on talk radio listening. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44: 635-654.
39. Rubin, R. B., and Martin, M. M., 1998. “ Interpersonal communication motives ”. In Communication and personality: Trait perspectives, Edited by: McCroskey, J. C., Daly, J. A., Martin, M. M., and Beatty, M. J., 287-307. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
40. Rubin, R. B., Perse, E. M., and Barbato, C. A., 1988. Conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal communication motives. Human Communication Research, 14: 602-628.
41. Tucker, R. K., and Chase, L. J., 1980. Canonical correlation in human communication research. Human Communication Research, 3: 86-96.
42. Vittengl, J. R., and Holt, C. S., 1998. A time‐series diary study of mood and social interaction. Motivation & Emotion, 22: 255-275.
43. Westmyer, S. A., DiCioccio, R. L., and Rubin, R. B., 1998. Appropriateness and effectiveness of communication channels in competent interpersonal communication. Journal of Communication, 48(3): 27-28.